Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 313–337 | Cite as

Gambling Participation in the U.S.—Results from a National Survey

  • John W. Welte
  • Grace M. Barnes
  • William F. Wieczorek
  • Marie-Cecile Tidwell
  • John Parker

Abstract

Demographic patterns of gambling participation in the U.S. were examined. A national telephone survey was conducted with 2,630 representative U.S. residents aged 18 or older. The sample as weighted for analysis was 48% male, 12% black, and 11% Hispanic. Respondents were questioned on 15 types of gambling: how often they played and how much they won or lost. Eighty-two percent gambled in the past year. Lottery was the most commonly played game, while casino gambling accounted for the largest extent of gambling involvement. Men and women were equally likely to gamble in the past year, but men gambled more frequently and had larger wins and losses, particularly on sports betting and games of skill. Blacks were less likely to have gambled in the past year, but blacks who gambled did so more heavily than other racial groups. Blacks and Hispanics were more likely than average to be pathological gamblers. The rate of past year gambling declined with age, but extent of gambling involvement among gamblers did not vary with age. Rates of participation in most forms of gambling increased with socioeconomic status, but higher socioeconomic status gamblers had lower rates of pathological gambling, and lower extent of gambling involvement, particularly for lottery. New Englanders gambled more heavily than other Americans. Comparison with past studies showed an increase in overall gambling participation in the U.S., and large increases in rates of participation in lottery and casino gambling.

gambling United States gender race age 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Beauchamp, D.E. (1980). Beyond alcoholism: Alcohol and public health policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Committee on the Social and Economic Impact of Pathological Gambling, National Research Council. (1999). Pathological Gambling. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Goodman, R. (1995). The luck business: The devastating consequences and broken promises of America's gambling explosion. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Kallick, M., Suits, D., Dielman, T., & Hybels, J. (1979). A survey of American gambling attitudes and behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  5. National Opinion Research Center. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study. Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Pavalko, R.M. (2000). Risky business. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  7. Rose, I.N. (2001). http://www.gamblingandthelaw.com/ Google Scholar
  8. Stricker, L.J. (1988). Measuring social status with occupational information: A simple method. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(5), 423–437.Google Scholar
  9. Volberg, R.A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237–241.Google Scholar
  10. Volberg, R.A. (1996). Gambling and problem gambling in New York: A 10-year replication survey, 1986 to 1996. Report to the New York Council on Problem Gambling. Roaring Spring, PA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  11. Welte, J., Barnes, G., Wieczorek, W., Tidwell, M.-C., & Parker, J. (2001). Alcohol and gambling among U.S. adults: Prevalence, demographic patterns and comorbidity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(5): 706–712.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Welte
    • 1
  • Grace M. Barnes
    • 1
  • William F. Wieczorek
    • 2
  • Marie-Cecile Tidwell
    • 1
  • John Parker
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute on AddictionsBuffalo
  2. 2.Buffalo

Personalised recommendations