Biogeochemistry

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 235–316

The biogeochemistry of sulfur at Hubbard Brook

  • G.E. Likens
  • C.T. Driscoll
  • D.C. Buso
  • M.J. Mitchell
  • G.M. Lovett
  • S.W. Bailey
  • T.G. Siccama
  • W.A. Reiners
  • C. Alewell
Article

Abstract

A synthesis of the biogeochemistry of S was done during 34 yr(1964–1965 to 1997–1998) in reference and human-manipulated forestecosystems of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF), NH. There have beensignificant declines in concentration (−0.44µmol/liter-yr) and input (−5.44mol/ha-yr)of SO42− in atmospheric bulk wet deposition, and inconcentration(−0.64 µmol/liter-yr) an d output (−3.74mol/ha-yr) of SO42− in stream water ofthe HBEF since 1964. These changes arestrongly correlated with concurrent decreases in emissions of SO2from the source area for the HBEF. The concentration and input ofSO42− in bulk deposition ranged from a low of 13.1µmol/liter (1983–1984) and 211 mol/ha-yr(1997–1998) to a high of 34.7 µmol/liter(1965–1966) and 479 mol/ha-yr (1967–1968), with along-term mean of 23.9 µmol/liter and 336mol/ha-yr during 1964–1965 to 1997–1998. Despiterecentdeclines in concentrations, SO42− is the dominantanion in both bulk deposition and streamwater at HBEF. Dry deposition is difficult to measure, especially inmountainousterrain, but was estimated at 21% of bulk deposition. Thus, average totalatmospheric deposition was 491 and 323 mol/ha-yr during1964–1969 and 1993–1998, respectively. Based on the long-termδ34S pattern associated with anthropogenic emissions,SO42− deposition at HBEF is influenced by numerousSO2sources, but biogenic sources appear to be small. Annual throughfall plusstemflow in 1993–1994 was estimated at 346 molSO42−/ha. Aboveground litterfall, for thewatershed-ecosystemaveraged about 180 mol S/ha-yr, with highest inputs (190 molS/ha-yr) in the lower elevation, more deciduous forest zone. Weatheringrelease was calculated at a maximum of 50 mol S/ha-yr. Theconcentration and output of SO42− in stream waterranged from a low of 42.3µmol/liter (1996–1997) and 309 mol/ha-yr(1964–1965), to a high of 66.1 µmol/liter(1970–1971) and 849 mol/ha-yr (1973–1974), with along-term mean of 55.5 µmol/liter and 496mol/ha-yr during the 34 yrs of study. Gross outputs ofSO42− in stream water consistently exceeded inputsin bulkdeposition and were positively and significantly related to annualprecipitationand streamflow. The relation between gross SO42−output and annual streamflow changed with time asatmospheric inputs declined. In contrast to the pattern for bulk depositionconcentration, there was no seasonal pattern for streamSO42− concentration. Nevertheless, stream outputs ofSO42− were highly seasonal, peaking during springsnowmelt, andproducing a monthly cross-over pattern where net hydrologic flux (NHF) ispositive during summer and negative during the remainder of the year. Nosignificant elevational pattern in streamwaterSO42− concentration was observed. Mean annual,volume-weightedsoil water SO42− concentrations were relativelyuniform by soil horizon andacross landscape position. Based upon isotopic evidence, much of theSO42− entering HBEF in atmospheric depositioncycles throughvegetation and microbial biomass before being released to the soil solution andstream water. Gaseous emissions of S from watershed-ecosystems at HBEF areunquantified, but estimated to be very small. Organic S (carbon bonded andestersulfates) represents some 89% of the total S in soil at HBEF. Some 6% exists asphosphate extractable SO42− (PSO4).About 73% of the total S in the soilprofile at HBEF occurs in the Bs2 horizon, and some 9% occurs in the forestfloor. The residence time for S in the soil was calculated to be ∼9 yr, butonly a small portion of the total organic soil pool turns over relativelyquickly. The S content of above- and belowground biomass is about 2885mol/ha, of which some 3–5% is in standing dead trees. Yellowbirch, American beech and sugar maple accounted for 89% of the S in trees, with31% in branches, 27% in roots and 25% in the lightwood of boles. The pool of Sin living biomass increased from 1965 to 1982 due to biomass accretion, andremained relatively constant thereafter. Of current inputs to the availablenutrient compartment of the forest ecosystem, 50% is from atmospheric bulkdeposition, 24% from net soil release, 11% from dry deposition, 11% from rootexudates and 4% is from canopy leaching. Comparing ecosystem processes for Sfrom 1964–1969 to 1993–1998, atmospheric bulk deposition decreasedby 34%, stream output decreased by 10%, net annual biomass storage decreased by92%, and net soil release increased by 184% compared to the 1964–1969values. These changes are correlated with decreased emissions of SO2from the source area for the HBEF. Average, annual bulk deposition inputsexceeded streamwater outputs by 160.0 ± 75.3 SD molS/ha-yr,but average annual net ecosystem fluxes (NEF) were much smaller, mostlynegativeand highly variable during the 34 yr period (−54.3 ± 72.9 SDmol S/ha-yr; NEF range, +86.8 to −229.5). While severalmechanisms may explain this small discrepancy, the most likely are netdesorption of S and net mineralization of organic S largely associated with theforest floor. Our best estimates indicate that additional S from dry depositionand weathering release is probably small and that desorption accounts for about37% of the NEF imbalance and net mineralization probably accounts for theremainder (∼60%). Additional inputs from dry deposition would result fromunmeasured inputs of gaseous and particulate deposition directly to the forestfloor. The source of any unmeasured S input has important implications for therecovery of soils and streams in response to decreases in inputs of acidicdeposition. Sulfate is a dominant contributor to acid deposition at HBEF,seriously degrading aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Because of the strongrelation between SO2 emissions and concentrations ofSO42− in both atmospheric deposition and streamwater at HBEF,further reductions in SO2 emissions will be required to allowsignificant ecosystem recovery from the effects of acidic deposition. Thedestruction or removal of vegetation on experimental watershed-ecosystems atHBEF resulted in increased rates of organic matter decomposition andnitrification, a lowering of soil and streamwater pH, enhancedSO42− adsorption on mineral soil and smallerconcentrations andlosses of SO42− in stream water. With vegetationregrowth, this adsorbedSO42− is released from the soil, increasingconcentrations andfluxes of SO42− in drainage water. Streamwaterconcentration ofSO42− and gross annual output ofSO42−/ha are essentially the same throughout theHubbard BrookValley in watersheds varying in size by about 4 orders of magnitude, from 3 to3000 ha.

Acidic deposition Atmospheric deposition (wet and dry) Forest disturbance Forest ecosystem Landscape patterns Net ecosystem flux Net hydrologic flux SO2 emissions Soil chemistry Streamwater chemistry Sulfur biogeochemistry Vegetation chemistry Weathering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber J.D. and Driscoll C.T. 1997. Effects of land use, climate variation, and N deposition on N cycling and C storage in northern hardwood forests. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 11: 639-648.Google Scholar
  2. Aber J.D., Botkin D.B. and Melillo J.M. 1978. Predicting the effects of different harvesting regimes on forest floor dynamics in northern hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 8: 306-315.Google Scholar
  3. Aber J.D., Ollinger S.V. and Driscoll C.T. 1997. Modeling nitrogen saturation in forest ecosystems in response to land use and atmospheric deposition. Ecol. Modelling 101: 61-78.Google Scholar
  4. The Acidifying Emissions Task Group 1997. Towards a National Acid Rain Strategy. Inquiry Centre at Environment Canada, Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Alewell C. 2002. Predicting reversibility of acidification: The European Sulfur Story. Water Air and Soil Pollution (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Alewell C. and Gehre M. 1999. Patterns of stable S isotopes in a forested catchment as indicators for biological S turnover. Biogeochemistry 47: 319-333.Google Scholar
  7. Alewell C., Mitchell M., Likens G.E. and Krouse R. 1999. Sources of stream sulfate at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: long-term analysis using stable isotopes. Biogeochemistry 44: 281-299.Google Scholar
  8. Alewell C., Mitchell M., Likens G.E. and Krouse R. 2000. Assessing the origin of sulfate deposition at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 759-767.Google Scholar
  9. Anonymous 1995.Acid Deposition Standard Feasibility Study Report to Congress. EPA 430-R-95-001a. United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  10. Bailey S.W. and Hornbeck J.W. 1992. Lithologic composition and rock weathering potential of forested, glacial-till soils. Res Pap.. NE-662. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Bailey S.W., Buso D.C. and Likens G.E. 2002a. Implications of sodium mass balance for interpreting the calcium cycle of a northern hardwood ecosystem. Ecology (submitted).Google Scholar
  12. Bailey S.W., Mayer B. and Mitchell M.J. 2002b. The influence of mineral weathering on drainage water sulfate in the northeastern United States. Biogeochemistry (submitted).Google Scholar
  13. Billings M.P. and Wilson J.R. 1964. Chemical Analyses of Rocks and Rock-minerals from New Hampshire. New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development, Concord, NH, Vol. Part XIX.Google Scholar
  14. Bormann F.H. and Likens G.E. 1967. Nutrient cycling. Science 155: 424-429.Google Scholar
  15. Bormann F.H. and Likens G.E. 1969. The watershed-ecosystem concept and studies of nutrient cycles. In: VanDyne G.M. (ed.), The Ecosystem Concept in Natural Resource Management, Chapter IV. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp.49-79.Google Scholar
  16. Bormann F.H. and Likens G.E. 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York Inc., 253 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Bormann F.H., Likens G.E. and Eaton J.S. 1969. Biotic regulation of particulate and solution losses from a forest ecosystem. BioScience 19: 600-610.Google Scholar
  18. Bormann F.H., Likens G.E., Fisher D.W. and Pierce R.S. 1968. Nutrient loss accelerated by clear-cutting of a forest ecosystem. Science 159: 882-884.Google Scholar
  19. Bormann F.H., Likens G.E., Siccama T.G., Pierce R.S. and Eaton J.S. 1974. The export of nutrients and recovery of stable conditions following deforestation at Hubbard Brook. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 255-277.Google Scholar
  20. Bowen H.J.M. 1979. Environmental Chemistry of the Elements. Academic Press, London, UK, 333 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Brakke D.F., Henriksen A. and Norton S.A. 1989. Estimated background concentrations of sulfate in dilute lakes. Water Resources Bulletin 25: 247-252.Google Scholar
  22. Burkhardt J. and Drechsel P. 1997. The synergism between SO2 oxidation and manganese leaching on spruce needles-a chamber experiment. Environmental Pollution 95: 1-11.Google Scholar
  23. Burton T.M. and Likens G.E. 1975. Energy flow and nutrient cycling in salamander populations in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Ecology 56: 1068-1080.Google Scholar
  24. Buso D.C., Likens G.E. and Eaton J.S. 2000. Chemistry of precipitation, stream water and lake water from the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: A record of sampling protocols and analytical procedures. General Tech., Report NE-275. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 52 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Butler T.J., Likens G.E. and Stunder B.J.B. 2001. Regional-scale impacts of Phase I of the Clean Air Act Amendments in the USA: The relation between emissions and concentrations, both wet and dry. Atmospheric Environment 35: 1015-1028.Google Scholar
  26. Caron F., Tessier A., Kramer J.R., Schwarcz H.P. and Rees C.E. 1986. Sulfur and oxygen isotopes of sulfur in precipitation and lakewater, Quebec, Canada. Appl. Geochem 1: 601-606.Google Scholar
  27. Charlson R.J., Anderson T.L. and McDuff R.E. 1992. The sulfur cycle. In: Butcher S.S., Charlson R.J., Orians G.H. and Wolfe G.V. (eds), Global Biogeochemical Cycles. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 285-300.Google Scholar
  28. Church M.R., Thornton K.W., Shaffer P.W. and et al. 1989. Direct/Delayed Response Project: Future Effects of Long-Term Sulfur Deposition on Surface Water Chemistry in the Northeast and Southern Blue Ridge Province. EPA/600/3-89/061. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  29. Clair T.A., Dillon P.J., Ion J., Jeffries D.S., Pepineau M. and Vet R.J. 1995. Regional precipitation and surface water chemistry trends in southeastern Canada (1983-1991). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 52: 197-212.Google Scholar
  30. Clarke J.F., Edgerton E.S. and Martin B.E. 1997. Dry deposition calculations for the Clean Air Status and Trends Network. Atmos. Environ. 31: 3667.Google Scholar
  31. Clarkson D.T. and Hanson J.B. 1980. The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31: 239-298.Google Scholar
  32. Cogbill C.V. and Likens G.E. 1974. Acid precipitation in the northeastern United States. Water Resour. Res. 10: 1133-1137.Google Scholar
  33. Dahlgren R.A. and Driscoll C.T. 1994. The effects of whole-tree clear-cutting on soil processes at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA. Plant Soil 158: 239-262.Google Scholar
  34. David M.B., Mitchell M.J. and Scott T.J. 1987. Importance of organic sulfur constituents to sulfur cycling in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils 5: 258-264.Google Scholar
  35. David M.B., Mitchell M.J., Aldcorn D. and Harrison R.B. 1989. Analysis of sulfur in soil, plant and sediment materials: sample handling and use of an automated analyzer. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21: 119-123.Google Scholar
  36. David M.B., Fuller R.D., Fernandez I.J., Mitchell M.J., Rustad L.E., Vance G.F. et al. 1990. Spodosol variability and assessment of response to acidification. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 541-548.Google Scholar
  37. DeHayes D.H., Schaberg P.G., Hawley G.J. and Strimbeck G.R. 1999. Acid rain impacts on calcium nutrition and forest health. BioScience 49: 789-800.Google Scholar
  38. Driscoll C.T. and Likens G.E. 1982. Hydrogen ion budget of an aggrading forested ecosystem. Tellus 34: 283-292.Google Scholar
  39. Driscoll C.T., Johnson N.M., Likens G.E. and Feller M.C. 1988. Effects of acidic deposition on the chemistry of headwater streams: a comparison between Hubbard Brook, New Hampshire, and Jamieson Creek, British Columbia. Water Resour. Res. 24: 195-200.Google Scholar
  40. Driscoll C.T., Likens G.E. and Church M.R. 1998a. Recovery of surface waters in the northeastern U.S. from decreases in atmospheric deposition of sulfur. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 105: 319-329.Google Scholar
  41. Driscoll C.T., Postek K.M., Mateti D., Sequeira K., Aber J.D., Kretser W.J. et al. 1998b. The response of lake water in the Adirondack Region of New York to changes in acidic deposition. Environ. Sci. and Policy 1: 185-198.Google Scholar
  42. Driscoll C.T., Lawrence G.B., Bulger A.J., Butler T.J., Cronan C.S., Eagar C. et al. 2001. Acidic deposition in the northeastern U.S.: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. BioScience 51: 180-198.Google Scholar
  43. Eaton J.S., Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1973. Throughfall and stemflow chemistry in a northern hardwood forest. Journal of Ecology 61: 495-508.Google Scholar
  44. Environment Canada 1995. NatChem Annual Reports CAPMoN 1983-1994. (National Atmospheric Chemistry Data Base). Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  45. Environment Canada 1997. 1997 Canadian Acid Rain Assessment. Atmospheric Science Assessment Report. Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Fay J.A., Colomb D. and Kumar S. 1985. Source apportionment of wet sulfate deposition in eastern North America. Atmos. Environ. 19: 1773-1782.Google Scholar
  47. Federer C.A., Flynn L.D., Martin C.W., Hornbeck J.W. and Pierce R.S. 1990. Thirty years of hydrometeorologic data at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. General Technical Report, NE-141 USDA Forest Service, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Fuller R.D., David M.B. and Driscoll C.T. 1985. Sulfate adsorption relationships in forested spodosols of the Northeast USA. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49: 1034-1040.Google Scholar
  49. Fuller R.D., Driscoll C.T., Schindler S.C. and Mitchell M.J. 1986a. A simulation model of sulfur transformations in forested Spodosols. Biogeochemistry 2: 313-328.Google Scholar
  50. Fuller R.D., Mitchell M.J., Krouse H.R., Syskowski B.J. and Driscoll C.T. 1986b. Stable sulfur isotope ratios as a tool for interpreting ecosystem sulfur dynamics.Water, Air and Soil Pollution 28: 163-171.Google Scholar
  51. Fuller R.D., Driscoll C.T., Lawrence G. and Nodvin S.C. 1987. Processes regulating sulphate flux after whole-tree harvesting. Nature (London) 325: 707-710.Google Scholar
  52. Galloway J.N. and Likens G.E. 1981. Acid precipitation: the importance of nitric acid. Atmos. Environ. 15: 1081-1085.Google Scholar
  53. Galloway J.N., Norton S.N. and Church M.R. 1983. Freshwater acidification from atmospheric deposition: a conceptual model. Environmental Science and Technology 17: 541A-545A.Google Scholar
  54. Garland J.A. and Branson J.R. 1977. The deposition of SO2 to a pine forest assessed by a radiotracer method. Tellus B 29: 445-454.Google Scholar
  55. Gbondo-Tugbawa S.S., Driscoll C.T., Aber J.D. and Likens G.E. 2001. Evaluation of an integrated biogeochemical model (PnET-BGC) at a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Water Resour. Res. 37: 1057-1070.Google Scholar
  56. Gosz J.R., Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1972. Nutrient content of litter fall on the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Ecology 53: 769-784.Google Scholar
  57. Gosz J.R., Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1976. Organic matter and nutrient dynamics of the forest floor in the Hubbard Brook forest. Oecologia (Berl.) 22: 305-320.Google Scholar
  58. Greenwood N.N. and Earnshaw A. 1984. Chemistry of the Elements. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1542Google Scholar
  59. Harrison R.B., Johnson D.W. and Todd D.E. 1989. Sulfate adsorption and desorption in a variety of forest soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 18: 419-426.Google Scholar
  60. Hendrickson O.Q., Chatarpaul L. and Burgess D. 1989. Nutrient cycling following whole-tree and conventional harvest in northern mixed forest. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 725-735.Google Scholar
  61. Holland D.M., Principe P.P. and Sickles II J.E. 1999. Trends in atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen species in the eastern United States for 1989-1995. Atmospheric Environment 33: 37-49.Google Scholar
  62. Holland H.D. 1978. The Chemistry of the Atmosphere and the Oceans. Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
  63. Holmes R.T. and Sherry T.W. 2001. Thirty-year bird population trends in an unfragmented temperate deciduous forest: the importance of habitat change. The Auk 118: 589-609.Google Scholar
  64. Homann P.S., Mitchell M.J., Van Miegroet H. and Cole D.W. 1990. Organic sulfur in throughfall, stem-flow and soil solutions from temperate forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 1535-1539.Google Scholar
  65. Hornbeck J.W., Martin C.W., Pierce R.S., Bormann F.H., Likens G.E. and Eaton J.S. 1986. The northern hardwood forest ecosystem: Ten years of recovery from clearcutting. NE-RP-596. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall PA.Google Scholar
  66. Johnson C.E., Johnson A.H. and Huntington T.G. 1990. Sample size requirements for the determination of changes in soil nutrient pools. Soil Science 150: 637-644.Google Scholar
  67. Johnson C.E., Driscoll C.T., Siccama T.G. and Likens G.E. 2000. Element fluxes and landscape position in a northern hardwood forest watershed-ecosystem. Ecosystems 3: 159-184.Google Scholar
  68. Johnson C.M. and Nishita H. 1952. Microestimation of sulfur in plant materials, soils and irrigation waters. Anal. Chem. 24: 736-742.Google Scholar
  69. Johnson D.W. 1980. Site susceptibility to leaching by H2SO4 in acid rainfall. In: Hutchinson T.C. and Harras M. (eds), Effects of Acid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystems. Plenum, NY, pp. 525-535.Google Scholar
  70. Johnson D.W. and Todd D.E. 1987. Nutrient export by leaching and whole-tree harvesting in a loblolly pine and mixed oak forest. Plant Soil 102: 99-109.Google Scholar
  71. Johnson D.W. and Lindberg S.E. 1992. Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Nutrient Cycling. Ecological Studies. Vol. 91. Springer-Verlag, NY, 707 pp.Google Scholar
  72. Johnson D.W. and Mitchell M.J. 1998. Responses of forest ecosystems to changing sulfur inputs. In: Maynard D. (ed.), Sulfur in the Environment. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, pp. 219-262.Google Scholar
  73. Johnson D.W., Hornbeck J.W., Kelly J.M., Swankill S.T. and Todd D.E. 1980. Regional patterns of soil sulfate accumulation: relevance to ecosystem sulfur budgets. In: Shriner D.S. et al. (ed.), Atmospheric Sulfur Deposition: Environmental Impacts and Health Effects. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 507-520.Google Scholar
  74. Johnson D.W., Swank W.T. and Vose J.M. 1993. Simulated effects of atmospheric sulfur deposition on nutrient cycling in a mixed deciduous forest. Biogeochemistry 23: 169-196.Google Scholar
  75. Johnson N.M., Likens G.E., Bormann F.H. and Pierce R.S. 1968. Rate of chemical weathering of silicate minerals in New Hampshire. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 32: 531-545.Google Scholar
  76. Johnson N.M., Driscoll C.T., Eaton J.S., Likens G.E. and McDowell W.H. 1981. Acid rain,_ dissolved aluminum and chemical weathering at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Geochim. Cosmoch. Acta 45: 1421-1437.Google Scholar
  77. Kennish M.J. (ed.) 1989. Practical Handbook of Marine Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  78. Landers D.H., David M.B. and Mitchell M.J. 1983. Analysis of organic and inorganic sulfur constituents in sediments, soil and water. International J. Environ. and Analy. Chem. 14: 245-256.Google Scholar
  79. Lawrence G.B., Fuller R.D. and Driscoll C.T. 1987. Release of aluminum following whole-tree harvesting at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. J. Environ. Qual. 16: 383-390.Google Scholar
  80. Lawrence G.B., David M.B., Lovett G.M., Murdoch P.S., Burns D.A., Stoddard J.L. et al. 1999. Soil calcium status and the response of stream chemistry to changing acidic deposition rates. Ecological Applications 9: 1059-1072.Google Scholar
  81. Likens G.E. 1985. An experimental approach for the study of ecosystems. J. Ecology 73: 381-396.Google Scholar
  82. Likens G.E. 1992. The Ecosystem Approach: Its Use and Abuse. 'Excellence in Ecology,' Book 3. The Ecology Institute, Oldendorf-Luhe, Germany, 167 pp.Google Scholar
  83. Likens G.E. 1999. The science of nature, the nature of science: Long-term ecological studies at Hubbard Brook. Proceedings, American Philosophical Society 143: 558-572.Google Scholar
  84. Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1970. Chemical analyses of plant tissues from the Hubbard Brook ecosystem in New Hampshire. Yale University School of Forestry, Bulletin 79, 25 pp.Google Scholar
  85. Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1974a. Acid rain: a serious regional environmental problem. Science 184: 1176-1179.Google Scholar
  86. Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1974b. Effects of forest clearing on the northern hardwood forest ecosystem and its biogeochemistry. In: Proc. First Internat. Congress Ecology. Centre Agric. Publ. Doc., Wageningen, The Hague, pp. 330-335.Google Scholar
  87. Likens G.E. and Bormann F.H. 1995. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem. 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, 159 pp.Google Scholar
  88. Likens G.E. and Davis M.B. 1975. Post-glacial history of Mirror Lake and its watershed in New Hampshire, USA: an initial report. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 19: 982-993.Google Scholar
  89. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H. and Johnson N.M. 1969. Nitrification: importance to nutrient losses from a cutover forested ecosystem. Science 163: 1205-1206.Google Scholar
  90. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Johnson N.M., Fisher D.W. and Pierce R.S. 1970. Effects of forest cutting and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in the Hubbard Brook watershed-ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 40: 23-47.Google Scholar
  91. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H. and Johnson N.M. 1972. Acid rain. Environment 14: 33-40.Google Scholar
  92. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Pierce R.S., Eaton J.S. and Johnson N.M. 1977. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem. 1st edn. Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, 146 pp.Google Scholar
  93. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Pierce R.S. and Reiners W.A. 1978. Recovery of a deforested ecosystem. Science 199: 492-496.Google Scholar
  94. Likens G.E., Wright R.F., Galloway J.N. and Butler T.J. 1979. Acid rain. Sci. Amer. 241: 43-45.Google Scholar
  95. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Pierce R.S. and Eaton J.S. 1985. The Hubbard Brook Valley. In: Likens G.E. (ed.), An Ecosystem Approach to Aquatic Ecology: Mirror Lake and its Environment. Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, pp. 9-39.Google Scholar
  96. Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Hedin L.O., Driscoll C.T. and Eaton J.S. 1990a. Dry deposition of sulfur: a 23-year record for the Hubbard Brook Forest ecosystem. Tellus B 42B: 319-329.Google Scholar
  97. Likens G.E., Hedin L.O. and Butler T.J. 1990b. Some long-term precipitation chemistry patterns at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: extremes and averages. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 24: 128-135.Google Scholar
  98. Likens G.E., Driscoll C.T., Buso D.C., Siccama T.G., Johnson C.E., Ryan D.F. et al. 1994. The biogeochemistry of potassium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 25: 61-125.Google Scholar
  99. Likens G.E., Driscoll C.T. and Buso D.C. 1996. Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 272: 244-246.Google Scholar
  100. Likens G.E., Driscoll C.T., Buso D.C., Siccama T.G., Johnson C.E., Lovett G.M. et al. 1998. The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 41: 89-173.Google Scholar
  101. Likens G.E., Butler T.J. and Buso D.C. 2001. Long-and short-term changes in sulfate deposition: Effects of The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Biogeochemistry 52: 1-11.Google Scholar
  102. Lindberg S.E. and Garten C.T. 1988. Sources of sulfur in forest canopy throughfall. Nature 336: 148-151.Google Scholar
  103. Lindberg S.E. and Lovett G.M. 1992. Deposition and canopy interactions of airborne sulfur: Results from the Integrated Forest Study. Atmospheric Environment 26A: 1477-1492.Google Scholar
  104. Lovett G.M. 1994. Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and pollutants to North America: An ecological perspective. Ecol. Applications 4: 629-650.Google Scholar
  105. Lovett G.M. and Hubbell J.G. 1991. Effects of ozone and acid mist on foliar leaching from eastern white pine and sugar maple. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 794-802.Google Scholar
  106. Lovett G.M., Likens G.E. and Nolan S.S. 1992. Dry deposition of sulfur to the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: A preliminary comparison of methods. In: Schwarz S.E. and Slinn W.G.N. (eds), Pre-cipitation Scavenging and Atmosphere-Surface Exchange, Volume 3. Hemisphere Publ. Co., Washington, DC, pp. 1391-1402.Google Scholar
  107. Lovett G.M., Nolan S.S., Driscoll C.T. and Fahey T.J. 1996. Factors regulating throughfall flux in New Hampshire forested landscape. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 2134-2144.Google Scholar
  108. Lovett G.M., Bowser J.J. and Edgerton E.S. 1997. Atmospheric deposition to watersheds in complex terrain. Hydrological Processes 11: 645-654.Google Scholar
  109. Lovett G.M., Thompson A.W., Anderson J.B. and Bowser J.J. 1999. Elevational patterns of sulfur deposition at a site in the Catskill Mountains, New York. Atmospheric Environment 33: 617-624.Google Scholar
  110. Mann L.K., Johnson D.W., West D.C., Cole D.W., Hornbeck J.W., Martin C.W. et al. 1988. Effects of whole-tree and stem-only clear-cutting on postharvest hydrologic losses, nutrient capital and regrowth. Forest Sci. 34: 412-428.Google Scholar
  111. Markewitz D., Richter D.D., Allen H.L. and Urrego J.B. 1998. Three decades of observed soil acidifi-cation in the Calhoun Experimental Forest: Has acid rain made a difference? Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 62: 1428-1439.Google Scholar
  112. Martin C.W. and Hornbeck J.W. 1989. Regeneration 10 years after strip and block clearcuts in northern hardwoods. In: Briggs R.D., Krohn W.B., Trial J.G., Ostrofsky W.D. and Field D.B. (eds), Forest and Wildlife Management in New England-What Can We Afford? Proc. Joint Meeting of Maine Division of New England Society of American Foresters, Maine Chapter of the Wildlife Society, and the Atlantic International Chapter of the American Fisheries Society. College of Forest Resources CFRU Information Rep. 21, Univ. Maine, Orono, p. 235.Google Scholar
  113. Martin C.W., Likens G.E. and Buso D.C. 2000a. Comparison of long-term precipitation chemistry measurements at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 120: 359-379.Google Scholar
  114. Martin C.W., Hornbeck J.W., Likens G.E. and Buso D.C. 2000b. Impacts of intensive harvesting on hydrology and nutrient dynamics of northern hardwood forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 57: 19-29.Google Scholar
  115. Matzner E. and Meiwas K.J. 1994. Long-term development of element fluxes with bulk precipitation and throughfall in two German forests. Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 162-166.Google Scholar
  116. Mayer B., Feger K.H., Giesemann A. and Jäger H.-J. 1995. Interpretation of sulfur cycling in two catchments in the Black Forest (Germany) using stable sulfur and oxygen isotope data. Biogeochemistry 30: 31-58.Google Scholar
  117. McGill W.B. and Christie E.K. 1983. Biogeochemical aspects of nutrient cycle interactions in soils and organisms. In: Bolin B. and Cook R.B. (eds), The Major Biogeochemical Cycles and their Interactions. SCOPE 21. John Wiley & Sons, Dorchester, UK, pp. 271-301.Google Scholar
  118. Mengel K. and Kirkby E.A. 1979. Principles of Plant Nutrition. International Potash Institute, Worblaufern-Bern, Switzerland, 593 pp.Google Scholar
  119. Meyers T.P. and Baldocchi D.D. 1993. Trace gas exchange above the floor of a deciduous forest 2. SO2 and O3 deposition. Journal of Geophysical Research 98: 12631-12638.Google Scholar
  120. Mitchell M.J., Driscoll C.T., Fuller R.D., David M.B. and Likens G.E. 1989. Effect of whole-tree harvesting on the sulfur dynamics of a forest soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53: 933-940.Google Scholar
  121. Mitchell M.J., David M.B. and Harrison R.B. 1992. Chapter 9. Sulfur dynamics of forest ecosystems. In: Howarth R.W., Stewart J.W.B. and Ivanov M.V. (eds), Sulfur Cycling on the Continents. SCOPE Vol. 48. John Wiley and Sons, NY, pp. 215-254.Google Scholar
  122. Mitchell M.J., Krouse C.R., Mayer B., Stam A.C. and Zhang Y. 1998. Use of stable isotopes in evaluating sulfur biogeochemistry of forest ecosystems. In: Kendall C. and McDonnell J.J. (eds), Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 489-518.Google Scholar
  123. Mitchell M.J., Mayer B., Bailey S.W., Hornbeck J.W., Alewell C., Driscoll C.T. et al. 2001. Use of stable isotope ratios for evaluating sulfur sources and losses at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 130: 75-86.Google Scholar
  124. Moench R.H., Boone G.M., Bothner W.A., Boudette E.L., Hatch N.L., Hussey A.M. et al. 1995. Geologic map of the Sherbrooke-Lewiston Area, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont, United States and Quebec, Canada. Map I-1898-D. 1:250,000. US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  125. Mohn V.A. and Vong R.J. 1993. A climatology of cloud chemistry for the eastern United States derived from the mountain cloud chemistry project. Environ. Rev. 1: 38-92.Google Scholar
  126. Mohren G.M.J., Jorritsma I., Vermetten A. and Kropf M. 1992. Quantifying the direct effects of SO2 and O3 on forest growth. Forest Ecology and Management 51: 137-150.Google Scholar
  127. Munn R.E., Likens G.E., Weisman B., Hornbeck J.W., Martin C.W. and Bormann F.H. 1984. A meteorological analysis of the precipitation chemistry event samples at the Hubbard Brook (NH). Atmos. Environ. 18: 2275-2779.Google Scholar
  128. Nodvin S.C., Driscoll C.T. and Likens G.E. 1986a. The effect of pH on sulfate adsorption by a forest soil. Soil Science 142: 69-75.Google Scholar
  129. Nodvin S.C., Driscoll C.T. and Likens G.E. 1986b. Simple partitioning of anions and dissolved organic carbon in a forest soil. Soil Science 142: 27-35.Google Scholar
  130. Nodvin S.C., Driscoll C.T. and Likens G.E. 1988. Soil process and sulfate loss at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Biogeochemistry 5: 185-199.Google Scholar
  131. Novac M., Bottrell S.H., Groscheova H., Buzek F. and Cerny J. 1995. Sulphur isotope characteristics of two North Bohemian forest catchments. Water, Air and Soil Pollut. 85: 1641-1646.Google Scholar
  132. Nriagu J.O. and Krouse H.R. 1992. Sulfur isotope evidence for emission of biogenic sulphur. In: Howarth R.W., Stewart J.W.B. and Ivanov M.V. (eds), Sulphur Cycling on the Continents. SCOPE 48. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 63-66.Google Scholar
  133. Nriagu J.O., Holdway D.A. and Coker R.D. 1987. Biogenic sulfur and the acidity of rainfall in remote areas of Canada. Science 237: 1189-1192.Google Scholar
  134. Onega T.L. and Eickmeier W.G. 1991. Woody detritus inputs and decomposition kinetics in a southern temperate deciduous forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 118: 52-57.Google Scholar
  135. Prietzel J. 1998. Untersuchungen zur Boden-Schwefel-Ausstattung zweier Schwarzwaldstandorte-Räumliche Variabilität, zeitliche Dynamik und Auswirkungen experimentaller Sulfatgaben. Habilitationschrift, LMU München, 399 pp.Google Scholar
  136. Reiners W.A. 1992. Twenty years of ecosystem reorganization following experimental deforestation and regrowth suppression. Ecol. Monog. 62: 503-523.Google Scholar
  137. Richter D.D. and Markewitz D. 1995. How deep is soil? BioScience 45: 600-609.Google Scholar
  138. Rustad L.E., Fernandez I.J., Mitchell M.J., Nadelhoffer K.J., David M.B. and Fuller R.B. 1996. Experimental soil acidification and recovery at the Bear Brook watershed in Maine. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 1933-1943.Google Scholar
  139. Ryan D.F. and Bormann F.H. 1982. Nutrient resorption in northern hardwood forests. BioScience 32: 29-32.Google Scholar
  140. Schindler D.W. 1980. Evolution of the Experimental Lakes Project. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 313-319.Google Scholar
  141. Schindler S.C. and Mitchell M.J. 1987. Dynamics of 35S in horizons and leachates from a hardwood forest spodosol. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19: 531-538.Google Scholar
  142. Schindler S.C., Mitchell M.J., Scott T.J., Fuller R.D. and Driscoll C.T. 1986. Incorporation of 35S-sulfate into organic and inorganic constituents of two forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 50: 457-461.Google Scholar
  143. Schwartz S.E. 1989. Acid deposition: unraveling a regional phenomenon. Science 243: 753-763.Google Scholar
  144. Shriner D.S., Heck W.W., McLauglin S.B., Johnson D.W., Irving P.M., Joslin J.D. et al. 1990. Response of Vegetation to Atmospheric Deposition and Air Pollution. NAPAP SOS/T, Report 18. Acidic Deposition: State of Science and Technology, Volume III. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, 722 Jackson Place NW, Washington, DC 20503.Google Scholar
  145. Skeffington R.A. and Sutherland P.M. 1995. The effects of SO2 and O3 fumigation on acid deposition and foliar leaching in the liphook forest fumigation experiment. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 247-261.Google Scholar
  146. Smith W.H. 1976. Character and significance of forest tree root exudates. Ecology 57: 324-331.Google Scholar
  147. Sollins P., Robertson G.P. and Uehara G. 1988. Nutrient mobility in variable-and permanent-charge soils. Biogeochemistry 6: 181-199.Google Scholar
  148. Stam A.C., Mitchell M.J., Krouse H.R. and Kahl J.S. 1992. Stable sulfur isotopes of sulfate in precipitation and stream solutions in a northern hardwood watershed. Water Resour. Res. 28: 231-236.Google Scholar
  149. Stevenson F.J. and Cole M.A. 1999. Cycles of Soil. Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 427 pp.Google Scholar
  150. Stoddard J.L., Jeffries D.S., Lükewille A., Clair T.A., Dillon P.J., Driscoll C.T. et al. 1999. Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe. Nature 401: 575-578.Google Scholar
  151. Strickland T.C., Fitzgerald J.W. and Swank W.T. 1984. Mobilization of recently formed forest soil organic sulfur. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 63-67.Google Scholar
  152. Sturges F.W., Holmes R.T. and Likens G.E. 1974. The role of birds in nutrient cycling in a northern hardwoods ecosystem. Ecology 55: 149-155.Google Scholar
  153. Swank W.T., Fitzgerald J.W. and Ash J.T. 1984. Microbial transformation of sulfate in forest soils. Science 223: 182-184.Google Scholar
  154. Tamm C.O. and Popovic B. 1995. Long-term field experiments simulating increased deposition of sulphur and nitrogen to forest plots. Ecol. Bull. 44: 301-321.Google Scholar
  155. Turner J., Johnson D.W. and Lambert M.J. 1980. Sulfur cycling in a Douglas-fir forest and its modifi-cation by nitrogen applications. Oecol. Plant. 15: 27-35.Google Scholar
  156. Ugolini F.C., Corti G., Agnelli A. and Piccardi F. 1996. Mineralogical, physical and chemical properties of rock fragments in soil. Soil Science 161: 521-542.Google Scholar
  157. US EPA 1998. Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) Deposition Summary Report (1987-1995). EPA/600/R-98/027. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  158. US EPA 2000. National Air Pollutant Emission Trends, 1900-1998. EPA-454/R-00-002. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  159. Van Stempvort D.R. and Wills J.J. 1991. Aboveground vegetation effects on the deposition and cycling of atmospheric sulfur: chemical and stable isotope evidence. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 60: 55-82.Google Scholar
  160. Weathers K.C. and Likens G.E. 1998. Acid rain. In: Rom W.N. (ed.), Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 3rd edition. Lippincott-Raven Publ., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1549-1561.Google Scholar
  161. Weathers K.C., Lovett G.M., Likens G.E. and Caraco N. 1998. Cloud water in southern Chile: Whence come the nutrients? In: Schemenauer R.S. and Bridgman J. (eds), First International Conference on Fog and Fog Collection. IDRC, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 313-315.Google Scholar
  162. Wedepohl K.H. 1995. The composition of the continental crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59: 1217-1232.Google Scholar
  163. Whittaker R.H., Bormann F.H., Likens G.E. and Siccama T.G. 1972. The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: forest biomass and production. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 233-254.Google Scholar
  164. Whittaker R.H., Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Eaton J.S. and Siccama T.G. 1979. The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: forest nutrient cycling and element behavior. Ecology 60: 203-220.Google Scholar
  165. Wiklander L. 1980. The sensitivity of soils to acid precipitation. In: Hutchinson T.C. and Havas M. (eds), Effects of Acid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystems. Plenum, NY, pp. 553-568.Google Scholar
  166. Winter T.C. 1981. Uncertainties in estimating the water balance of lakes. Water Resour. Bull. 17: 82-115.Google Scholar
  167. Wood T. and Bormann F.H. 1975. Increases in foliar leaching caused by acidification of an artificial mist. Ambio 4: 169-171.Google Scholar
  168. Zech W., Schneider B.U. and Röhle H. 1991. Element composition of leaves and wood of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) on SO2-Polluted Sites of the NE-Bavarian Mountain. In: Zöttl H.W. and Hüttl R.F. (eds), Management of Nutrition in Forests under Stress. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 97-106.Google Scholar
  169. Zhang Y. 1994. Biogeochemistry of forest soils at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire: an experimental approach. PhD Dissertation. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  170. Zhang Y., Mitchell M.J., Christ M., Krouse H.R. and Likens G.E. 1998. Stable sulfur isotopes at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Biogeochemistry 41: 259-275.Google Scholar
  171. Zhang Y., Mitchell M.J., Driscoll C.T. and Likens G.E. 1999. Changes in soil sulfur constituents eight years after whole-tree harvesting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 356-364.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • G.E. Likens
    • 1
  • C.T. Driscoll
    • 2
  • D.C. Buso
    • 1
  • M.J. Mitchell
    • 3
  • G.M. Lovett
    • 1
  • S.W. Bailey
    • 4
  • T.G. Siccama
    • 5
  • W.A. Reiners
    • 6
  • C. Alewell
    • 7
  1. 1.Institute of Ecosystem StudiesNYUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringSyracuse UniversityNYUSA
  3. 3.State University College of Environmental Science & ForestrySyracuseUSA
  4. 4.Northeastern Forest Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceCamptonUSA
  5. 5.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  6. 6.Department of BotanyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  7. 7.Universität Bayreuth, BITÖKBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations