International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 709–725 | Cite as

Pollution Externalities in a Model of Endogenous Fertility and Growth

  • Poul Schou

Abstract

An endogenous growth model with human capital formation, pollution caused by production of consumption goods, and endogenous fertility decisions made by altruistic agents with infinite horizons is presented. Consequences for optimal policy of modelling fertility as an explicit decision variable are examined. Because ordinary lump-sum transfers to individuals are no longer neutral, either revenue from a pollution tax must be redistributed to dynasties (working as an implicit tax on child births), or lump-sum transfers must be supplemented with an explicit fertility tax. Alternatively, the government can avoid distortions of the fertility decisions by maintaining an appropriate public debt. When abatement is highly productive, it can be optimal to subsidize fertility in order to increase total production.

endogenous growth pollution optimal environmental policy endogenous fertility abatement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. New York.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S., K. M. Murphy and R. Tamura. (1990). “Human Capital, Fertility and Economic Growth. ” Journal of Political Economy 98.Google Scholar
  3. Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders. (1995). “Environmental Quality and Pollution-Augmenting Technological Change in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model. ” Journal of Public Economics 57, 369–391.Google Scholar
  4. Dasgupta, P. (1995). “The Population Problem: Theory and Evidence. ” Journal of Economic Literature 33.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrlich, I. and F. Lui. (1997). “The Problem of Population and Growth: A Review of the Literature from Malthus to Contemporary Models of Endogenous Population and Endogenous Growth. ” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21, 205–242.Google Scholar
  6. Gradus, R. and S. Smulders. (1993). “The Trade-off Between Environmental Care and Long-Term Growth— Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models. ” Journal of Economics 58(1), 25–51.Google Scholar
  7. Harford, J. D. (1997). “Stock Pollution, Child-Bearing Externalities, and the Social Discount Rate. ” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 94–105.Google Scholar
  8. Harford, J. D. (1998). “The Ultimate Externality. ” American Economic Review 88, 260–265.Google Scholar
  9. Lapan, H. E. and W. Enders. (1990). “Endogenous Fertility, Ricardian Equivalence, and Debt Management Policy. ” Journal of Public Economics 41, 227–248.Google Scholar
  10. Lucas, R. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development. ” Journal of Monetary Economics 22.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson, J. A. and T. N. Srinivasan. (1997). “Long-Term Consequences of Population Growth: Technological Change, Natural Resources, and the Environment. ” In Rosenzweig and Stark (eds.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Chapter 21, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Schou, P. (1999). “Endogenous Growth, Nonrenewable Resources and Environmental Problems. ” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  13. Smulders, S. and R. Gradus. (1996). “Pollution Abatement and Long-Term Growth. ” European Journal of Political Economy 12, 505–532.Google Scholar
  14. Stokey, N. (1998). “Are There Limits to Growth?” International Economic Review 39, 1–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Poul Schou
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish Economic CouncilKobenhavn KDenmark

Personalised recommendations