Political Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 3–29

The Politics of Participation: Mobilization and Turnout over Time

  • Kenneth M. Goldstein
  • Travis N. Ridout


Recent studies have argued that mobilization is not only an important determinant of individual participation, but that it can explain the mystery of declining voter turnout in the United States over the past 40 years. We identify and evaluate three possible ways in which mobilization might have affected levels of turnout over time: (a) aggregate rates of mobilization may have declined, (b) the effectiveness of mobilization contacts may have declined, and (c) the targeting of mobilization may have changed. The first two theories have been well articulated in the literature; the third has not. We find no evidence of a decline in mobilizing activity, nor do we find that mobilizing techniques have become less effective. Although we find that campaigns are more likely to target habitual voters in recent years, this pattern of behavior can only explain a small amount of the overall decline in turnout.

voter turnout mobilization political participation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, Paul, and Aldrich, John (1982). The decline in electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review 76: 502–521.Google Scholar
  2. Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W. (2002). Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
  3. Blydenburgh, John (1971). A controlled experiment to measure the effects of personal contact campaigning. Midwest Journal of Political Science 15: 365–381.Google Scholar
  4. Cutright, Phillips (1963). Measuring the impact of local party activity on the general election vote. Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 372–386.Google Scholar
  5. Gelman, Andrew, King, Gary, and Liu, Chuanhai (1998). Not asked and not answered: multiple imputation for multiple surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93: 846–857.Google Scholar
  6. Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald P. (2000). The effect of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: a field experiment. American Political Science Review 94: 653–662.Google Scholar
  7. Gosnell, Harold (1927). Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Green, John C. (1999). Financing the 1996 Election. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  9. Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, King, Gary, Scheve, Kenneth, and Singh, Naunihal (1999). Amelia: A Program for Missing Data (Windows version). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, http://GKing.Harvard.edu/Google Scholar
  10. Katz, Daniel, and Eldersveld, Samuel (1961). The impact of local party activity upon the electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly. 25: 1–24.Google Scholar
  11. Kernell, Samuel, and Jacobson, Gary (2000). Logic of American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  12. King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review 95: 49–70.Google Scholar
  13. Kramer, Gerald (1970). The effects of precinct level canvassing on voting behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 560–572.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, Paul S. (2001). Paying more for less? the changing impact of party contact on voter turnout. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  15. Merriam, Charles, and Gosnell, Harold (1924). Non-Voting: Causes and Methods of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nagel, Jack (1987). Participation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Sapiro, Virginia, Rosenstone, Steven J., and the National Election Studies (1999). 1948-1998 Cumulative Data File [dataset]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
  20. Schier, Steven E. (2000). By Invitation Only: The Rise of Exclusive Politics in the United States. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  21. Teixiera, Ruy A. (1987). Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States, 1960-1984. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  22. Teixiera, Ruy A. (1992). The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  23. Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Wielhouwer, Peter W., and Lockerbie, Brad (1994). Party contacting and political participation, 1952-90. American Journal of Political Science 38: 211–229.Google Scholar
  25. Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980). Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth M. Goldstein
    • 1
  • Travis N. Ridout
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadison

Personalised recommendations