Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 51–59 | Cite as

Effects of applying stem-shortening plant growth regulators to leaves on root elongation by seedlings of wheat, oat and barley: mediation by ethylene

  • Ari Rajala
  • Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio
  • Marko Onnela
  • Michael Jackson
Article

Abstract

Several plant growth regulators (PGRs) commonly used in practicalfarming to restrict shoot height and control lodging were examined for theirimpact on root growth in naturally short or tall cultivars of barley (cvs.Kymppi and Saana), oat (cvs. Veli and Pal), and wheat (cvs. Mahti and Tjalve).The possible involvement of ethylene in the responses was also examined. Shootswere sprayed at the two-leaf stage with the gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitorsCycocel (chlormequat chloride) (CCC) or Moddus (Trinexapac-ethyl) (TE), or withthe ethylene-releasing agent Cerone (ethephon) (ETH) at 0, 0.1, 1, 10 or 50times the recommended agricultural rate (RR). Root elongation and ethyleneproduction by roots or shoots were unaffected by CCC at all application ratesorby TE at ×0.1 or ×1.0 RR. At ×10 and ×50 RR, TE wasinhibitory to root extension but did not increase ethylene biosynthesis bytheseroots or the shoots. ETH at ×0.1 or ×1.0 RR did not affect rootextension or ethylene production in roots or shoots. At all higher rates ofapplication ETH stimulated ethylene production strongly in shoots and roots ofall three species, while root elongation was retarded severely in barley,moderately in oat and only slightly in wheat. These differences in elongationresponse are attributed to differences in sensitivity to ethylene released byethephon. Accordingly, root elongation in wheat was only slightly affected whenethylene gas was supplied at concentrations up to 100 ppm for 3d. In contrast, root elongation in barley was strongly inhibitedbyethylene, with oat demonstrating an intermediate responsiveness.

Barley Ethylene Oats Plant growth regulators Root growth Wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arissian M., Perissin-Fabert D., Blouet A., Morel J.L. and Guckert M. 1991. Effect of imazaquin on absorbtion, translocation, and pattern of distribution of chlormequat chloride in winter wheat. J. Plant Growth Regul. 10: 1–4.Google Scholar
  2. Barber D.A. and Lee R.B. 1974. The effect of micro-organisms on the absorption of manganese by plants. New Phytol. 73: 97– 106.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow P.W. 1992. The meristem and quiescent centre in cultured root apices of the GIB-1 mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Ann. Bot. 69: 533–543.Google Scholar
  4. Cannell R.Q. 1981. Cereal root systems: factors affecting their growth and function. In: Hawkins A.F. and Jeffcoat B. (eds), Opportunities for Manipulation of Cereal Productivity, Monograph 7. British Plant Growth Regulator Group, Wantage, pp. 118–129.Google Scholar
  5. Comfort S.D., Maizer G.I. and Bush R.H. 1988. Nitrogen fertilization of spring wheat genotypes: Influence on root growth and soil water depletion. Agron. J. 80: 114–120.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke D.T., Hoad G.V. and Child R.D. 1983. Some effects of plant growth regulators on root and shoot development and mineral nutrient-ion uptake in winter wheat. In: Jackson M. (ed.), Growth Regulators on Root and Shoot Development, Monograph 10. British Plant Growth Regulator Group, Wantage, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
  7. Croser C., Bengough A.G. and Pritchard J. 2000. The effect of mechanical impedance on root growth in pea (Pisum sativum). II. Cell expansion and wall rheology during recovery. Physiol. Plant. 109: 150–159.Google Scholar
  8. Crosset R.N. and Campbell D.J. 1975. The effects of ethylene in the root environment upon the development of barley. Plant Soil 42: 453–464.Google Scholar
  9. De R., Giri G., Saran G., Singh R.K. and Chaturvedi G.S. 1982. Modification of water balance of dryland wheat through the use of chlormequat chloride. J. Agric. Sci. 98: 593–597.Google Scholar
  10. Foster K.R., Reid D.M. and Pharis R.P. 1992. Ethylene biosynthesis and ethephon metabolism and transport in barley. Crop Sci. 32: 1345–1352.Google Scholar
  11. Gianfagna T. 1995. Natural and synthetic growth regulators and their use in horticultural and agronomic crops. In: Davies P. (ed.), Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 751–774.Google Scholar
  12. Hamblin A. and Tennant T. 1987. Root length density and water uptake in cereals and grain legumes: How well are they correlated? Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38: 513–527.Google Scholar
  13. Huang B., Johnson J.W., Box J.E. and NeSmith D.S. 1997. Root characteristics and hormone activity of wheat in response to hypoxia and ethylene. Crop Sci. 37: 812–818.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson M.B. 1991. Ethylene in root development. In: Suttle J. and Mattoo A.K. (eds), Ethylene Action in Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson M.B. 1993. Are plant hormones involved in root to shoot communication? Adv. Bot. Res. 19: 103–187.Google Scholar
  16. Kendall W.A. and Leath K.T. 1974. Slant-board culture methods for root observations of red clover. Crop Sci. 14: 317–320.Google Scholar
  17. Konings H. and Jackson M.B. 1979. A relationship between rates of ethylene production by roots and the promoting or inhibiting effects of exogenous ethylene and water on root elongation. Zeitschr. Pflanzenphysiol. 92: 385–397.Google Scholar
  18. Lambers H. 1987. Growth, respiration, exudation and symbiotic associations: the fate of carbon translocated to the roots. In: Gregory P.J. and Rose D.A. (eds), Root development and function. SEB Seminar Series 30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 125–145.Google Scholar
  19. Ma B.L. and Smith D.L. 1991. The effects of ethephon, chlormequat chloride and mixtures of ethephon and chlormequat chloride applied at the beginning of stem elongation on spikebearing shoots and other yield components of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 166: 127–135.Google Scholar
  20. Mac Key J. 1988. Shoot:root interrelations in oats. In: Mattsson B. and Lyhagen R. (eds), 3rd International Oat Conference. Svalöv, Sweden, pp. 340–344.Google Scholar
  21. Moss G.I., Hall K.C. and Jackson M.B. 1988. Ethylene and the responses of maize (Zea mays L.) roots to physical impedance. New Phytol. 109: 303–312.Google Scholar
  22. Rademacher W., Temple-Smith K.E., Griggs D.L. and Hedden P. 1992. The mode of action of acyclohexanediones — a new type of growth retardant. In: Karssen C., Van Loon L. and Vreugdenhill D. (eds), Progress in Plant Growth Regulation. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Plant Growth Substances. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 571–577.Google Scholar
  23. Rajala A. and Peltonen-Sainio P. 2000. Manipulating yield potential in cereals by plant growth regulators. In: Basra A.S. (ed.), Plant Growth Regulators in Agriculture and Horticulture: their role and commercial uses. Food Products Press, Binghamton, New York, pp. 27–70.Google Scholar
  24. Russell R.S. 1977. Plant root systems. Their function and interaction with the soil. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Maidenhead, Berkshire, 298 pp.Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute Inc. 1996. Advanced general linear models with an emphasis on mixed models, course notes, 614 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Siddique K.H.M., Belford R.K. and Tennant D. 1990. Root:shoot ratios of old and modern semi-dwarf wheats in a Mediterranean environment. Plant Soil 121: 89–98.Google Scholar
  27. Simmons S.R., Oeike E.A., Wiersma J.V., Lueschen W.E. and Warnes D.D. 1988. Spring wheat and barley responses to ethephon. Agron. J. 80: 829–834.Google Scholar
  28. Smith K.A. and Robertson P.D. 1971. Effect of ethylene on root extension of cereals. Nature 234: 148–149.Google Scholar
  29. Smith K.A. and Dowdell R.J. 1973. Field studies of the soil atmosphere. 1. Relationship between ethylene, oxygen, soil moisture content, and temperature. J. Soil Sci. 25: 217–230.Google Scholar
  30. Woodward E.J. and Marshall C. 1987. Effects of seed treatment with plant growth regulator on growth and tillering in spring barley (Hordeum distichum) cv. Triumph. Ann. Appl. Biol. 110: 629–638.Google Scholar
  31. Woodward E.J. and Marshall C. 1988. Effects of plant growth regulators and nutrient supply on tiller bud outgrowth in barley (Hordeum distichum L.). Ann. Bot. 61: 347–354.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ari Rajala
    • 1
  • Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio
    • 1
  • Marko Onnela
    • 1
  • Michael Jackson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant Production, Section of Crop HusbandryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland (
  2. 2.IACR – Long Ashton Research Station, Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of Bristol, Long AshtonBristolUK

Personalised recommendations