Biological Invasions

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 223–233 | Cite as

Size-structured Interactions between Native and Introduced Species: Can Intraguild Predation Facilitate Invasion by Stream Salmonids?

  • Yoshinori Taniguchi
  • Kurt D. Fausch
  • Shigeru Nakano


Dynamics of biological invasions may be complicated in size-structured animal populations. Differences in timing of life history events such as juvenile emergence create complex interaction webs where different life stages of native and non-native species act as predators, competitors, and prey. Stream salmonids are an ideal group for studying these phenomena because they display competition and predation in size-structured populations and have been introduced worldwide. For example, introduced rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are invading streams of Hokkaido Island, Japan and have caused declines in native masu salmon (O. masou) populations. However, age-0 rainbow trout emerge later than age-0 masu salmon and are smaller, which raises the question of why they are able to recruit and therefore invade in the face of a larger competitor. We conducted experiments in laboratory stream channels to test effects of increasing density of age-0 and age-1 rainbow trout on age-0 masu salmon. Age-1 rainbow trout dominated age-0 masu salmon by aggressive interference, relegating them to less favorable foraging positions downstream and reducing their foraging frequency and growth. The age-1 trout also reduced masu salmon survival by predation of about 40% of the individuals overall. In contrast, age-0 rainbow trout had little effect on age-0 masu salmon. Instead, the salmon dominated the age-0 trout by interference competition and reduced their survival by predation of 60% of the individuals. In each case, biotic interactions by the larger species on the smaller were strongly negative due to a combination of interspecific competition and intraguild predation. We predict that together these produce a positive indirect effect in the interaction chain that will allow the recruitment of rainbow trout in the face of competition and predation from age-0 masu salmon, and thereby facilitate their invasion in northern Japan.

indirect effects intraguild predation invasion facilitation native masu salmon non-native rainbow trout size-structured interactions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior 49: 226–267Google Scholar
  2. Aoyama T, Takami T, Fujiwara M and Kawamula H (1999) Natural reproduction of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, in the Shiribetsu River in Hokkaido, Japan. Scientific Report of the Hokkaido Fish Hatchery 53: 29–38Google Scholar
  3. Brown LR and Moyle PB (1991) Changes in habitat and microhabitat partitioning within an assemblage of stream fishes in response to predation by Sacramento squawfish (Ptychocheilus grandis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 849–856Google Scholar
  4. D'Antonio CM and Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 63–87Google Scholar
  5. Fausch KD (1984) Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 441–451Google Scholar
  6. Fausch KD (1998) Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon: on testing effects and evaluating the evidence across scales. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55 (Suppl. 1): 218–231Google Scholar
  7. Fausch KD (2000) Shigeru Nakano – an uncommon fish ecologist. Environmental Biology of Fishes 59: 359–364Google Scholar
  8. Fausch KD and White RJ (1981) Competition between brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and browntrout (Salmo trutta) for positions in a Michigan stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 1220–1227Google Scholar
  9. Fausch KD and White RJ (1986) Competition among juveniles of coho salmon, brook trout, and brown trout in a laboratory stream, and implications for Great Lake tributaries. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115: 363–381Google Scholar
  10. Fausch KD, TaniguchiY, Nakano S, GrossmanGD and Townsend CR (2001) Flood disturbance regimes influence rainbow trout invasion success among five Holarctic regions. Ecological Applications 11: 1438–1455Google Scholar
  11. Flecker AS and Townsend CR (1994) Community-wide consequences of trout introduction in New Zealand streams. Ecological Applications 4: 798–807Google Scholar
  12. Gotelli NJ (1998) A Primer of Ecology, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 206 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Grant JWA (1996) Territoriality. In: Godin JG (ed) Behavioural Ecology of Teleost Fish, pp 143–160. Chapman & Hall, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant JWA and Kramer DL (1990) Territory size as a predictor of the upper limit to population density of juvenile salmonids in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 1724–1737Google Scholar
  15. Hughes NF (1992) Ranking of feeding positions by drift-feeding Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in dominance hierarchies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 1994–1998Google Scholar
  16. Huntingford FA (1993) Can cost-benefit analysis explain fish distribution patterns? Journal of Fish Biology 43 (Suppl. A): 289–308Google Scholar
  17. Johnson DM (1991) Behavioral ecology of dragonfly and damselflies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 8–13Google Scholar
  18. Kato F (1991) Life history of masu and amago salmon. In: Groot C and Margolis L (eds) Pacific Salmon Life Histories, pp 447–520. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Kishida T (1937) Regarding the introduced fishes to Lake Shikotsu. Sakemasu Ihou 32: 25–30 [in Japanese]Google Scholar
  20. Kitano S, Nakano S, Inoue M, Shimoda K and Yamamoto S (1993) Feeding and reproductive ecology of exotic rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Horonai Stream in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 59: 1837–1843 [in Japanese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  21. Leitritz E (1960) Trout and Salmon Culture. Fish Bulletin 107, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, 348 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Mack MC and D'Antonio CM(1998) Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 195–198Google Scholar
  23. McIntosh AR and Townsend CR (1995) Contrasting predation risks presented by introduced brown trout and native common river galaxias in New Zealand streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1821–1833Google Scholar
  24. Meffe GK (1985) Predation and species replacement in American southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwestern Naturalist 30: 173–187Google Scholar
  25. Moyle PB and Light T (1996) Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biological Conservation 78: 149–161Google Scholar
  26. Moyle PB, Li HW and Barton BA (1986) The Frankenstein effect: impact of introduced fishes on native fishes in North America. In: Stroud RH (ed) Fish Culture in Fisheries Management, pp 415–426. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakano S (1995) Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted masu salmon in a natural habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 75–84Google Scholar
  28. Nakano S, Kitano S, Nakai K and Fausch KD (1998) Competitive interactions for foraging microhabitat among introduced brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis, and native bull charr, S. confluentus, and westslope cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi, in a Montana stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 52: 345–355Google Scholar
  29. Olson MH, Mittelbach GG and Osenberg CW (1995) Competition between predator and prey: resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology 76: 1758–1771Google Scholar
  30. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE and Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1: 3–19Google Scholar
  31. Persson L (1988) Asymmetries in competitive and predaceous interactions in fish populations. In: Ebenmann B and Persson L (eds) Size Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution, pp 203–218. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Polis GA (1988) Exploitation competition and the evolution of interference, cannibalism and intraguild predation in age/size structured populations. In: Ebenmann B and Persson L (eds) Size Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution, pp 183–202. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Polis GA and Holt RD (1992) Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 151–154Google Scholar
  34. Polis GA, Meyers CA and Holt RD(1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 297–330Google Scholar
  35. Rose GA (1986) Growth decline in subyearling brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) after emergence of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43: 187–193Google Scholar
  36. SAS (1996) Statistical Analysis System, Version 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  37. Simberloff D and Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 21–32Google Scholar
  38. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, New York. 887 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Takami T and Aoyama T (1999) Distributions of rainbow and brown trouts in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Wildlife Conservation Japan 4: 41–48 [in Japanese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  40. Takami T, Aoyama T, Nagata M, Miyamoto M, Ohkubo S and Kawamula H (1998) Individual growth and life-history divergence of juvenile masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou) in a northern Japanese stream. Scientific Reports of the Hokkaido Fish Hatchery 52: 21–29Google Scholar
  41. Taniguchi Y (2000) Memoirs of Dr. Shigeru Nakano (1962–2000). Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 47: 145–148 [in Japanese]Google Scholar
  42. Taniguchi Y and Nakano S (2000) Condition-specific competition: implications for the altitudinal distribution of stream fishes. Ecology 81: 2027–2039Google Scholar
  43. Taniguchi Y, Novinger DC, Rahel FJ and Gerow K (1998) Temperature mediation of competitive interactions among three fish species, brook trout, brown trout, and creek chub, that replace each other along longitudinal stream gradients. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1894–1901Google Scholar
  44. Taniguchi Y, Miyake Y, Saito T, Urabe H and Nakano S (2000) Redd superimposition by introduced rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, on native charrs in a Japanese stream. Ichthyological Research 47: 149–156Google Scholar
  45. Townsend CR (1996) Invasion biology and ecological impacts of brown trout Salmo trutta in New Zealand. Biological Conservation 78: 13–22Google Scholar
  46. Townsend CR and Crowl TA(1991) Fragmented population structure in a native New Zealand fish: an effect of introduced brown trout? Oikos 61: 347–354Google Scholar
  47. Utoh H (1976) Study on the mechanism of differentiation between the stream resident form and the seaward migratory form in masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou Brevort. I. Growth and sexual maturity of early mature masu salmon parr. Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 26: 321–326 [in Japanese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  48. Werner EE (1994) Ontogenetic scaling of competitive relations: sizedependent effects and responses in two anuran larvae. Ecology 75: 197–213Google Scholar
  49. Werner EE and Gilliam J (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics. 15: 3933–425Google Scholar
  50. Wilbur HM (1988) Interactions in size-structured populations: from individual behavior to ecosystem dynamics. In: Ebenmann B and Persson L (eds) Size Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution, pp 157–170. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects in natural communities. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 25: 443–466Google Scholar
  52. Wootton RJ (1990) Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Chapman & Hall, London, 404 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Zaret TM and Paine RT (1973) Species introduction in a tropical lake. Science 182: 449–455Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshinori Taniguchi
    • 1
  • Kurt D. Fausch
    • 1
  • Shigeru Nakano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Life ScienceYamaguchi Prefectural UniversityYamaguchiJapan
  2. 2.Center for Ecological ResearchKyoto University, OtsuKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations