Biological Invasions

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 327–332 | Cite as

Human-mediated Escalation of a Formerly Eradicable Problem: The Invasion of Caribbean Frogs in the Hawaiian Islands

Article

Abstract

Two species of neotropical frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui and E. planirostris, have been introduced into the State of Hawaii via the horticulture trade. E. coqui was introduced prior to 1988 and E. planirostris was first reported in 1994. Since these dates frog colonies have rapidly spread accidentally and intentionally and frog abundance within colonies has grown rapidly. Although these frogs were originally restricted to horticulture sites, they are now found in residential areas, resorts and hotels, and public lands. Due to the high potential biomass of introduced frogs there are realistic anthropogenic and ecological concerns associated with the spread of these frogs. Though there currently is a tool that can be used for localized control of frogs in limited circumstances, overall efforts by Federal, State, and County agencies to control the frog in Hawaii have been hampered by limited authorities and funds, disbelief in the threat, and the reluctance to act.

Eleutherodactylus frogs Hawaiian Islands human-facilitated invasion introduced species 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison D (2001) Inouye wants frogs eradicated. West Hawaii Today 5 September: 1Google Scholar
  2. Burton TM and Likens GE (1975a) Energy flow and nutrient cycling in salamander populations in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Ecology 56: 1068–1080Google Scholar
  3. Burton TM and Likens GE (1975b) Salamander populations and biomass in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Copeia 1975: 541–546Google Scholar
  4. Campbell EW (1996) The effect of brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis) predation on the island of Guam's extant lizard assemblages***. PhD dissertation. Department of Zoology. Ohio State University, 91 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards T (2001) Tree frogs invade Kailua-Kona. West Hawaii Today 19 August: 1A, 6AGoogle Scholar
  6. Fritts TH and Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam***. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 113–140Google Scholar
  7. Fujimori L (2001) Shrieking frogs invade Oahu. Honolulu Star-Bulletin 8 July: 1, 6Google Scholar
  8. Fullington G (1999) Alien frogs. Hawaii Tribune-Herald 24 February: 11Google Scholar
  9. Greenwell K (2001) Another voice for the coqui. Hawai'i Island Journal 1–15 October: 4Google Scholar
  10. Hurley T (2001) New group leaps into fray over destruction of Caribbean frogs. The Honolulu Advertiser 10 September: 1Google Scholar
  11. Kraus F, Campbell EW, Allison A and Pratt TK (1998) New frog introductions to Hawai'i: current status, likely impacts, and prospects for control. Abstr. 1998 Hawai'i Conservation Conference: 25–26Google Scholar
  12. Kraus F, Campbell EW, Allison A and Pratt TK (1999) Eleutherodactylus frog introductions to Hawaii. Herpetological Review 30(1): 21–25Google Scholar
  13. Low T (1999) Feral Future: the Untold Story of Australia's Exotic Invaders. Viking Press/Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood, Victoria, Australia, 380 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Mack RN (1985) Invading plants, their potential contribution to population biology. In: White J (ed) Studies on Plant Demography: a Festschrift for John L. Harper, pp 127–142. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Mack RN and Moody ME (1992) Modelling to predict the fate of invading plants. In: Stone CP, Smith CW and Tunison JT (eds) Alien Plant Invasions in Native Ecosystems of Hawaii: Management and Research, pp 739–742. Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  16. Moody ME and Mack RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 1009–1021Google Scholar
  17. Pechman JHK, Scott DE, Gibbons JW and Semlitsch RD (1989) Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1: 3–11Google Scholar
  18. Rodda GH, Perry G, Rondeau RJ and Lazell J (2001) The densest terrestrial vertebrate. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17: 331–338Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz A and Henderson RW (1991) Amphibians and Reptiles of theWest Indies: Descriptions, Distributions, and Natural History***. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer SR (2001) Viewpoint: save the ‘Hawaiian’ coqui! Hawaii Island Journal 16–30 September: 4–5Google Scholar
  21. Snell H and Rea S (1999) The 1997–98 El Niño in Galápagos: can 34 years of data estimate 120 years of pattern? Noticias de Galápagos 60: 11–20Google Scholar
  22. Steinberg J (2001) Hawaiians lose sleep over tiny frog with big voice***. New York Times, 1 October: 16Google Scholar
  23. Stewart MM and Pough FH (1983) Population density of tropical forest frogs: relation to retreat sites. Science 221: 570–572Google Scholar
  24. Stewart MM and Woolbright LL (1996) Amphibians. In: Reagan D and Waide R (eds) The Food Web of a Tropical Rain Forest, pp 273–320. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Wobeser G (1994) The Investigation and Management of Disease in Wild Animals. Kluwer Academic Publishers/Plenum Press, New York, 265 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Land and Natural ResourcesHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations