Neurochemical Research

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 1027–1033 | Cite as

Validated Genomic Approach to Study Differentially Expressed Genes in Complex Tissues

  • Elisa Wurmbach
  • Javier González-Maeso
  • Tony Yuen
  • Barbara J. Ebersole
  • Jason W. Mastaitis
  • Charles V. Mobbs
  • Stuart C. Sealfon


Microarray-based genomic techniques allow the simultaneous determination of relative levels of expression of a large number of genes. Studies of the transcriptome in complex neurobiological systems are uniquely demanding due to the heterogeneous nature of these cells. Most brain regions contain a large variety of cell populations that are closely intermingled. The expression of any specific gene may be restricted to a subpopulation of cells, and changes in gene expression may occur in only a small fraction of the cells expressing that transcript. Due to this dilution effect, many genes of interest are expected to have relatively low levels of expression in tissue homogenates. Furthermore, biologically significant differences in expression may result in only small fold-changes. Therefore genomic approaches using brain dissections must be optimized to identify potentially regulated transcripts and differential expression should be confirmed using quantitative assays. We evaluated the effects of increasing tissue complexity on detection of regulated transcripts in focused microarray studies using a mouse cell line, mouse hypothalamus and mouse cortex. Regulated transcripts were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. As tissue complexity increased, distinguishing significantly regulated genes from background variation became increasingly more difficult. However, we found that cDNA microarray studies using regional brain dissections and appropriate numbers of replicates could identify genes showing less than 2-fold regulation and that most regulated genes identified fell within this range.

Microarray brain real-time PCR gonadotrope hypothalamus cortex 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alizadeh, A. A., Eisen, M. B., Davis, R. E., Ma, C., Lossos, I. S., Rosenwald, A., Boldrick, J. C., Sabet, H., Tran, T., Yu, X., Powell, J. I., Yang, L., Marti, G. E., Moore, T., Hudson, J., Jr., Lu, L., Lewis, D. B., Tibshirani, R., Sherlock, G., Chan, W. C., Greiner, T. C., Weisenburger, D. D., Armitage, J. O., Warnke, R., and Staudt, L. M. 2000. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403:503-511.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., Bloomfield, C. D., and Lander, E. S. 1999. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286:531-537.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pomeroy, S. L., Tamayo, P., Gaasenbeek, M., Sturla, L. M., Angelo, M., Mclaughlin, M. E., Kim, J. Y., Goumnerova, L. C., Black, P. M., Lau, C., Allen, J. C., Zagzag, D., Olson, J. M., Curran, T., Wetmore, C., Biegel, J. A., Poggio, T., Mukherjee, S., Rifkin, R., Califano, A., Stolovitzky, G., Louis, D. N., Mesirov, J. P., Lander, E. S., and Golub, T. R. 2002. Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 415: 436-442.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van T Veer, L. I., Dai, H., Van De Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., Van Der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., Schreiber, G. J., Kerkhoven, R. M., Roberts, C., Linsley, P. S., Bernards, R., and Friend, S. H. 2002. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530-536.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lashkari, D. A., Derisi, J. L., Mccusker, J. H., Namath, A. F., Gentile, C., Hwang, S. Y., Brown, P. O., and Davis, R. W. 1997. Yeast microarrays for genome wide parallel genetic and gene expression analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13057-13062.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iyer, V. R., Eisen, M. B., Ross, D. T., Schuler, G., Moore, T., Lee, J. C. F., Trent, J. M., Staudt, L. M., Hudson, J., Jr., Boguski, M. S., Lashkari, D., Shalon, D., Botstein, D., and Brown, P. O. 1999. The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science 283:83-87.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., and Brown, P. O. 1995. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270:467-470.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dudoit, S., Yang, Y. H., Callow, M. J., and Speed, T. P. 2000. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. http://stat-www. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerr, M. K., Afshari, C. A., Bennett, L., Bushel, P., Martinez, J., Walker, N. J., and Churchill, G. A. 2001. Statistical analysis of a gene expression microarray experiment with replication. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wurmbach, E., Yuen, T., Ebersole, B. J., and Sealfon, S. C. 2001. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-coupled gene network organization. J. Biol. Chem. 276:47195-47201.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuen, T., Zhang, W., Ebersole, B. J., and Sealfon, S. C. 2002. Monitoring G-protein-coupled receptor signaling with DNA microarrays and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 345:556-569.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuen, T., Wurmbach, E., Pfeffer, R. L., Ebersole, B. J., and Sealfon, S. C. 2002. Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:e48.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alarid, E. T., Windle, J. J., Whyte, D. B., and Mellon, P. L. 1996. Immortalization of pituitary cells at discrete stages of development by directed oncogenesis in transgenic mice. Development 122:3319-3329.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barnes, N. M. and Sharp, T. 1999. A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 38:1083-1152.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lopez-Gimenez, J. F., Mengod, G., Palacios, J. M., and Vilaro, M. T. 1997. Selective visualization of rat brain 5-HT2A receptors by autoradiography with [3H]MDL 100,907. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 356:446-454.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pazos, A., Cortes, R., and Palacios, J. M. 1985. Quantitative autoradiographic mapping of serotonin receptors in the rat brain. II. Serotonin-2 receptors. Brain Res. 346:231-249.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jakab, R. L. and Goldman-Rakic, P. S. 1998. 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A serotonin receptors in the primate cerebral cortex: possible site of action of hallucinogenic and antipsychotic drugs in pyramidal cell apical dendrites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:735-740.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramakrishnan, R., Dorris, D., Lublinsky, A., Nguyen, A., Domanus, M., Prokhorova, A., Gieser, L., Touma, E., Lockner, R., Tata, M., Zhu, X., Patterson, M., Shippy, R., Sendera, T. J., and Mazumder, A. 2002. An assessment of Motorola CodeLink microarray performance for gene expression profiling applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:e30.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trogan, E., Choudhury, R. P., Dansky, H. M., Rong, J. K., Breslow, J. L., and Fisher, E. A. 2002. Laser capture microdissection analysis of gene expression in macrophages from atherosclerotic lesions of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 99:2234-2239.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dent, G. W., O'dell, D. M., and Eberwine, J. H. 2001. Gene expression profiling in the amygdala: an approach to examine the molecular substrates of mammalian behavior. Physiol. Behav. 73:841-847.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuen, T., Wurmbach, E., Ebersole, B. J., Pfeffer, R. L., Ruf, F., and Sealfon, S. C. 2002. Coupling of GnRH concentration and the GnRHR-activated gene program. Mol. Endocrinol. 16:1145-1153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisa Wurmbach
    • 1
  • Javier González-Maeso
    • 1
  • Tony Yuen
    • 1
  • Barbara J. Ebersole
    • 1
  • Jason W. Mastaitis
    • 2
  • Charles V. Mobbs
    • 2
  • Stuart C. Sealfon
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York
  2. 2.Fishberg Research Center for NeurobiologyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York
  4. 4.Fishberg Research Center for NeurobiologyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York
  5. 5.Department of Pharmacology and Biological ChemistryMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York

Personalised recommendations