Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Early Identification of Children At Risk for Costly Mental Health Service Use

  • Damon Jones
  • Kenneth A. Dodge
  • E. Michael Foster
  • Robert Nix
  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group
Article

Abstract

Children and adolescents with serious and persistent conduct problems often require large public expenditures. Successfully diverting one high risk child from unfortunate outcomes may result in a net savings to society of nearly $2 million, not to mention improving the life of that child and his or her family. This figure highlights the potential of prevention, which often rests on the ability to identify these children at a young age. This study examined the ability of a short conduct-problems screening procedure to predict future need for mental health assistance, special education services, and the juvenile justice system during elementary schoolages. The screen was based on teacher and parent report of child behavioralhabits in kindergarten, and was used to identify children as either at risk or not at risk for behavioral problems. Service outcomes were derived from a service-use assessment administered to parents at the end of the sixth grade, while special education information was gathered through a survey of school records. Study participants (463 kindergarten children; 54% male, 44% African American) were from economically disadvantaged neighborhoods in four diverse communities across the United States. Results indicated that, while controlling for demographic background variables, the risk indicator strongly predicted which children would require services related to conduct disorder or behavioral/emotional problems. Additional analyses revealed that the dichotomous high risk indicator was nearly as strong as the continuous screening variable in predicting the service-use outcomes, and that the screening of both parents and teachers may not be necessary for determining risk status.

prevention behavioral disorders service utilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., Howell, C. T., McConaughy, S. H., & Stanger, C. (1998). Six-year predictors of problems in a national sample: IV. Young adult signs of disturbance. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 718–727.Google Scholar
  3. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. NewYork: JohnWiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, W. S. (1996). Lives in the balance: Age-27 benefit-cost analysis of the High/ScopePerry Preschool Program. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Bartusch, D. R. J., Lynam, D. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. (1997). Is age important? Testing a general versus a developmental theory of antisocial behavior. Criminology, 35, 13–48.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, K. J., Lipman, E. L., Brown, S., Racine, Y., Boyle, M. H., & Offord, D. R. (1999). Predicting conduct problems: Can high risk children be identified in kindergarten and grade 1? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 470–480.Google Scholar
  7. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C.A. (Eds.) (1986).Criminal careers and career criminals. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, M. A. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 5–33.Google Scholar
  9. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1992). Adevelopmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorder: The Fast Track Program. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 509–527.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  11. Glascoe, F. P., Foster, E. M., & Wolraich, M. L. (1997). Aneconomic analysis of developmental detection methods. Pediatrics, 99(6), 830–837.Google Scholar
  12. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Hollingshead, A. A. (1979). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  14. Institute of Medicine (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorder: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (1991). Sampling of populations: Methods and applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Lochman, J. E., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1995). Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 549–559.Google Scholar
  18. Loeber, R. (1982). The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior: A review. Child Development, 53, 1431–1446.Google Scholar
  19. Loeber, R. (1991). Antisocial behavior: More enduring than changeable? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 393–397.Google Scholar
  20. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-coursepersistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.Google Scholar
  21. Quay, H. C., & Petersen, D. R. (1987). Manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (Available from H.C.Quay, University of Miami, Box 248074, Coral Gables, FL 33124).Google Scholar
  22. Stata Corp. (1999). Stata user's guide: Release 6. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stiffman, A. R., Horwitz, S. M., Hoagwood, K., Compton, W., Cottler, L., Bean, D. L., Narrow, W. E., & Weisz, J. R. (2000). The Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA): Adult and child reports. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(8), 1032–1039.Google Scholar
  24. Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Alicke, M. D., & Klotz, M. L. (1987). Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents:A meta-analysis for clinicians. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 542–549.Google Scholar
  25. Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S. G., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Effects of first-grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 585–602.Google Scholar
  26. Yoshikawa, H. (1994). Prevention as cumulative protection: Effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 28–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damon Jones
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Dodge
    • 2
  • E. Michael Foster
    • 3
  • Robert Nix
    • 1
  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Human DevelopmentVanderbilt UniversitySewanee
  2. 2.Center for Child and Family PolicyDuke UniversityUK
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and AdministrationPennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations