Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 385–398 | Cite as

Choice of Lookout Posts by Territorial Amberwing Dragonflies, Perithemis tenera (Anisoptera: Libellulidae)

Article

Abstract

Many territorial insects use specific perches, or lookout posts, from which they perceive and react to conspecific males and females. We investigated the lookout post choice of territorial male amberwing dragonflies (Perithemis tenera). An observational study indicated that males rarely perched directly at their oviposition site; rather, they perched farther out from shore than, and within 2 m from, their oviposition site. In an experimental study, we provided an array of perches at different distances from the shore and oviposition site to eliminate perch limitation as a factor in perch choice. The results of the experimental study confirmed the patterns evident in the observational study; males perched farther from shore than their oviposition site was located. Interestingly, in both the observational and the experimental study, when neighbors were close, a male perched away from his closest neighbor, which usually resulted in his oviposition site being closer to his neighbor than he was. Thus, male amberwings apparently alter their perch choice within their territories in response to the location of other males. These lookout post locations may provide the best opportunity for the territorial male to perceive passing females and intruding males, while minimizing conflict with their neighbors.

Perithemis tenera perch choice lookout post territorial defense habitat selection dragonfly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alcock, J. (1990). A large male competitive advantage in a lekking fly, Hermetia comstocki Williston (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Psyche 97: 267–277.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, J. (1994). Alternative mate-locating tactics in Chlosyne californica (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Ethology 97: 103–118.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, J. (1995). Body size and its effect on male-male competition in Hylaeus alcyoneus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). J. Insect Behav. 8: 149–159.Google Scholar
  4. Alcock, J., and Alcock, J. P. (1983). Male behaviour in two bumblebees, Bombus nevadensis auricomus and B. griseicollis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Zool. 200: 561–570.Google Scholar
  5. Alcock, J., and Carey, M. (1988). Hilltopping behaviour and mating success of the tarantula hawk wasp, Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), at a high elevation peak. J. Nat. Hist. 22: 1173–1178.Google Scholar
  6. Alcock, J., and Smith, A. P. (1995). Landmark-defense and scramble competition mating systems in two Australian tachinid flies (Diptera). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 68: 85–94.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R. R. (1983). Insect territoriality. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28: 65–89.Google Scholar
  8. Bick, G. H., and Bick, J. C. (1963). Behavior and population structure of the damselfly Enallagma civile (Hagan) (Odonata: Coenagriidae). Southwest. Nat. 8: 57–84.Google Scholar
  9. Bitzer, R. J., and Shaw, K. C. (1979). Territorial behavior of the red admiral, Vanessa atalanta (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Res. Lepid. 18: 36–49.Google Scholar
  10. Bitzer, R. J., and Shaw, K. C. (1983). Territorial behavior of Nymphalis antiopa and Polygonia comma (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 37: 1–13.Google Scholar
  11. Bitzer, R. J., and Shaw, K. C. (1995). Territorial behavior of the red admiral, Vanessa atalanta (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) I. The role of climatic factors and early interaction frequency on territorial start time. J. Insect Behav. 8: 47–66.Google Scholar
  12. Corbet, P. S. (1962). A Biology of Dragonflies, Quadrangle Books, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  13. Corbet, P. S. (1980). Biology of Odonata. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25: 189–217.Google Scholar
  14. Eason, P. K., and Stamps, J. A. (1992). The effect of visibility on territory size and shape. Behav. Ecol. 3: 166–172.Google Scholar
  15. Fried, C. S., and May, M. L. (1983). Energy expenditure and food intake of territorial male Pachydiplax longipennis (Odonata: Libellulidae). Ecol. Entomol. 8: 283–292.Google Scholar
  16. Goodchild, H. H. (1949). A curious habit of dragonflies. Nature 164: 1058.Google Scholar
  17. Gorb, S. N. (1994). Female perching behavior in Sympetrum sanguineum (Müller) at feeding places (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 23: 341–353.Google Scholar
  18. Heinrich, B., and Casey, T. M. (1978). Heat transfer in dragonflies: “Fliers” and “perchers.” J. Exp. Biol. 74: 17–36.Google Scholar
  19. Hinde, R. A. (1956). The biological significance of the territories of birds. Ibis 98: 340–369.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobs, M. E. (1955). Studies on territorialism and sexual selection in dragonflies. Ecology 36: 566–586.Google Scholar
  21. Needham, J. G., and Westfall, M. J., Jr. (1954). A Manual of the Dragonflies of North America (Anisoptera), University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  22. Nice, M. (1943). Studies in the life history of the song sparrow. II. The behavior of the song sparrow and other passerines. Trans. Linn. Soc. N.Y. 6: 1–328.Google Scholar
  23. Pajunen, V. I. (1964). Aggressive behaviour in Leucorrhinia caudalis Charp. (Odon., Libellulidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1: 357–369.Google Scholar
  24. Pajunen, V. I. (1966a). The influence of population density on the territorial behaviour of Leucorrhinia rubicunda L. (Odon., Libellulidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 3: 40–52.Google Scholar
  25. Pajunen, V. I. (1966b). Aggressive behaviour and territoriality in a population of Calopteryx virgo L. (Odon., Calopterygidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 3: 201–214.Google Scholar
  26. Pezalla, V. M. (1979). Behavioral ecology of the dragonfly Libellula pulchella Drury (Odonata: Anisoptera). Am. Midl. Nat. 102: 1–22.Google Scholar
  27. Post, D. C., and Jeanne, R. L. (1983). Male reproductive behavior of the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 62: 157–171.Google Scholar
  28. Ravenscroft, N. O. M. (1994). Environmental influences on mate location in male chequered skipper butterflies, Carterocephalus palaemon (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Anim. Behav. 47: 1179–1187.Google Scholar
  29. Rutowski, R. L., and Gilchrist, G. W. (1988). Male mate-locating behavior in the desert hackberry butterfly, Asterocampa leilia (Nymphalidae). J. Res. Lepid. 26: 1–12.Google Scholar
  30. Rutowski, R. L., Dickinson, J. L., and Terkanian, B. (1991). Behavior of male desert hackberry butterflies, Asterocampa leilia (Nymphalidae), at perching sites used in mate location. J. Res. Lepid. 30: 129–139.Google Scholar
  31. Rutowski, R. L., Demlong, M. J., and Leffingwell, T. (1994). Behavioural thermoregulation at mate encounter sites by male butterflies (Asterocampa leilia, Nymphalidae). Anim. Behav. 48: 833–841.Google Scholar
  32. Stern, D. L. (1991). Male territoriality and alternative male behaviors in the euglossine bee, Eulaema meriana (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 64: 421–439.Google Scholar
  33. Switzer, P. V. (1995). Influences on the Site Fidelity of Territorial Animals: Theoretical and Empirical Studies, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  34. Switzer, P. V. (1997a). Factors affecting site fidelity in a territorial animal, Perithemis tenera. Anim. Behav. 53: 865–877.Google Scholar
  35. Switzer, P. V. (1997b). Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 307–312.Google Scholar
  36. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Waage, J. K. (1973). Reproductive behavior and its relation to territoriality in Calopteryx maculata (Beauvois) (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Behaviour 47: 240–256.Google Scholar
  38. Wildermuth, H. (1991). Behaviour of Perithemis mooma Kirby at the oviposition site (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 20: 471–478.Google Scholar
  39. Wolf, L. L., and Waltz, E. C. (1984). Dominions and site-fixed aggressive behavior in breeding male Leucorrhinia intacta (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 107–115.Google Scholar
  40. Wolf, L. L., and Waltz, E. C. (1993). Alternative mating tactics in male white-faced dragonflies: Experimental evidence for a behavioural assessment ESS. Anim. Behav. 46: 325–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesEastern Illinois UniversityCharleston

Personalised recommendations