Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 3–30 | Cite as

Inducible Nicotine Production in Native Nicotiana as an Example of Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity

  • Ian T. Baldwin

Abstract

Nicotine, an inducible defense in a number of Nicotiana species, exemplifies adaptive phenotypic plasticity. The mechanisms responsible for its production are reviewed, and the induced character states are characterized allometrically in order to understand how inducibility changes over ontogeny responds to environmental variables that influence plant growth, and to relate inducible production to plant fitness correlates. The empirical evidence for fitness costs and benefits of inducible nicotine production are considered, and the physiological and ecological mechanisms potentially responsible for the costs are considered. An intimate understanding of the plant's natural history is an essential prerequisite to understanding these costs and benefits. Inducible nicotine production is just one of many traits that are altered after herbivore attack, and the cost–benefit model provides a valuable heuristic framework in which to understand the selective factors responsible for the maintenance of inducibly expressed traits.

Phenotypic plasticity induced defense nicotine costs and benefits post-fire germination 

REFERENCES

  1. Adler, F. R., and Karban, R. 1994. Defended fortresses or moving targets? Another model of inducible defenses inspired by military metaphors. Am. Nat. 144:813–832.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201–1202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alborn, H. T., Turlings, T. C. J., Jones, T. H., Stenhagen, G., Loughrin, J. H., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1997. An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 276:945–949.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, I. T. 1988a. The alkaloidal responses of wild tobacco to real and simulated herbivory. Oecologia 77:378–381.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, I. T. 1988b. Damage-induced alkaloids in tobacco: Pot-bound plants are not inducible. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1113–1120.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, I. T. 1988c. Short-term damage-induced increases in tobacco alkaloids protect plants. Oecologia 75:367–370.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, I. T. 1989. Mechanism of damaged-induced alkaloids in wild tobacco. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1661–1680.Google Scholar
  8. Baldwin, I. T. 1991. Damage-induced alkaloids in wild tobacco, pp. 47–49, in M. J. Raupp and D. W. Tallamy (eds.). Phytochemical Induction by herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Baldwin, I. T. 1993. Chemical changes rapidly induced by folivory, pp. 1–23, in E. A. Bernay (ed.). Insect-Plant Interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  10. Baldwin, I. T. 1996. Methyl jasmonate-induced nicotine production in Nicotiana attenuata: Inducing defenses in the field without wounding. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80:213–220.Google Scholar
  11. Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Allometric limits to the induced accumulation of nicotine in native tobacco. Plant Species Biol. 11:107–114.Google Scholar
  12. Baldwin, I. T. 1998. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:8113–8118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baldwin, I. T. 1999. The jasmonate cascade and the complexity of induced defense against herbivore attack, in M. Wink (ed.). The Role of Plant Secondary Metabolites and Their Utilization in Biotechnology. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffied, UK. In press.Google Scholar
  14. Baldwin, I. T., and Callahan, P. 1993. Autotoxicity and chemical defense: nicotine accumulation and carbon gain in solanaceous plants. Oecologia 94:534–541.Google Scholar
  15. Baldwin, I. T., and Karb, M. J. 1995. Plasticity in allocation of nicotine to reproductive parts in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:897–909.Google Scholar
  16. Baldwin, I. T., and Morse, L. 1994. Up in smoke: II. Germination of Nicotiana attenuata in response to smoke-derived cues and nutrients in burned and unburned soils. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2373–2391.Google Scholar
  17. Baldwin, I. T., and Ohnmeiss, T. E. 1993. Alkaloidal responses to damage in Nicotiana native to North America. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1143–1153.Google Scholar
  18. Baldwin, I. T., and Ohnmeiss, T. E. 1994a. Coordination of photosynthetic and alkaloidal responses to damage in uninducible and inducible Nicotiana sylvestris. Ecology 75:1003–1014.Google Scholar
  19. Baldwin, I. T., and Ohnmeiss, T. E. 1994b. Swords into plowshares? Nicotiana sylvestris does not use nicotine as a nitrogen source under nitrogen-limited growth. Oecologia 98:385–392.Google Scholar
  20. Baldwin, I. T., and Schmelz, E. A. 1994. Constraints on an induced defense: The role of canopy area. Oecologia 97:424–430.Google Scholar
  21. Baldwin, I. T., and Schmelz, E. A. 1996. Immunological “memory” in the induced accumulation of nicotine in wild tobacco. Ecology 77:236–246.Google Scholar
  22. Baldwin, I. T., Sims, C. L., and Kean, S. E. 1990. The reproductive consequences associated with inducible alkaloidal responses in wild tobacco. Ecology 71:252–262.Google Scholar
  23. Baldwin, I. T., Oesch, R. C., Merhige, P. M., and Hayes, K. 1993. Damage-induced root nitrogen metabolism in Nicotiana sylvestris: Testing C/N predictions for alkaloid production. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:3029–3043.Google Scholar
  24. Baldwin, I. T., Karb, M. J., and Ohnmeiss, T. E. 1994a. Allocation of 15N from nitrate to nicotine: Production and turnover of a damage-induced mobile defense. Ecology 75:1703–1713.Google Scholar
  25. Baldwin, I. T., Schemlz, E. A., and Ohnmeiss, T. E. 1994b. Wound-induced changes in root and shoot jasmonic acid pools correlate with induced nicotine synthesis in Nicotiana sylvestris Spegazzini and Comes. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2139–2157.Google Scholar
  26. Baldwin, I. T., Staszak-Kozinski, L., and Davidson, R. 1994c. Up in smoke: I. Smoke-derived germination cues for the postfire annual Nicotiana attenuata Torr. Ex. Watson. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2345–2371.Google Scholar
  27. Baldwin, I. T., Schemlz, E. A., and Zhang, Z.-P. 1996. Effects of octadecanoid metabolites and inhibitors on induced nicotine accumulation in Nicotiana sylvestris. J. Chem. Ecol. 22:61–73.Google Scholar
  28. Baldwin, I. T., Preston, C. A., Euler, M. A., and Gorham, D. 1997a. Patterns and consequences of benzyl acetone floral emissions from Nicotiana attenuata plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2327–2343.Google Scholar
  29. Baldwin, I. T., Zhang, Z.-P., Diab, N., Ohnmeiss, T. E., E. S., M., Lynds, G. Y., and Schmelz, E. A. 1997b. Quantification, correlations and manipulations of wound-induced changes in jasmonic acid and nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta 201:397–404.Google Scholar
  30. Baldwin, I. T., Gorham, D., Schmelz, E. A., Lewandowski, C., and Lynds, G. Y. 1998. Allocation of nitrogen to an inducible defense and seed in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 115:541–552.Google Scholar
  31. Barbosa, P., Gross, P., and Kemper, J. 1991. Influence of plant allelochemicals on the tobacco hornworm and its parasitoid, Cotesia congregata. Ecology 72:1567–1575.Google Scholar
  32. Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., and Pitelka, L. F. 1987. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience 37:58–67.Google Scholar
  33. Bender, C., and Palmer, D. 1996. Biosynthesis of coronatine, a thermoregulated phytotoxin produced by the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Arch. Microbiol. 166:71–75.Google Scholar
  34. Bergey, D. R., Howe, G. A., and Ryan, C. A. 1996. Polypeptide signaling for plants defensive genes exhibits analogies to defense signaling in animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:12053–12058.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Blechert, S., Brodschelm, W., HÖlder, S., Kammerer, L., Kutchan, T. M., MÜller, J. M., Xia, Z. Q., and Zenk, M. H. 1995. The octadecanoic pathways: Signal molecules for the regulation of secondary pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:4099–4105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Blechert, S., Bockelmann, C., BrÜmmer, O., FÜßlein, M., Gundlach, H., Haider, G., HÖlder, S., Kutchan, T. M., Weiler, E. W., and Zenk, M. H. 1997. Structural separation of biological activities of jasmonates and related compounds. J. Chem. Soc. 23:3549–3559.Google Scholar
  37. Bowers, M. D. 1988. Chemistry and coevolution: Iriidoid glycosides, plants and herbivorous insects, pp. 133–166, in K. C. Spencer (ed.). Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Bryant, J. P., Chapin, F. S., and Klein, D. R. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368.Google Scholar
  39. Creelman, R. A., and Mullet, J. E. 1997. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:355–381.Google Scholar
  40. Dawson, R. F. 1942. Accumulation of nicotine in reciprocal grafts of tomato and tobacco. Am. J. Bot. 29:66–71.Google Scholar
  41. DeMoraes, C. M., Lewis, W. J., Pare, P. W. Albron, H. T., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1998. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393:570–573.Google Scholar
  42. DeWitt, T. J., Sih, A., and Wilson, D. S. 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. TREE 13:77–81.Google Scholar
  43. Eisner, T. E., and Meinwald, J. 1995. The chemistry of sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:50–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Euler, M., and Baldwin, I. T. 1996. The chemistry of defense and apparency in the corollas of Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 107:102–112.Google Scholar
  45. Farmer, E. E., and Ryan, C. A. 1990. Interplant communication: Airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87:7713–7716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Farmer, E. E., and Ryan, C. A. 1992. Octadecanoid precursors of jasmonic acid activate the synthesis of wound-inducible proteinase inhibitors. Plant Cell 4:129–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Feth, F., Wagner, R., and Wagner, K. G. 1986. Regulation in tobacco callus of enzyme activities of the nicotine pathway I. The route from ornithine to methylpyrroline. Planta 168:402–407.Google Scholar
  48. Fineblum, W. L., and Rausher, M. D. 1995. Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517–520.Google Scholar
  49. Fowler, S. V., and Lawton, J. H. 1985. Rapidly induced defenses and talking trees: The devil's advocate position. Am. Nat. 126:181–195.Google Scholar
  50. Gershenzon, J. 1994. The cost of plant chemical defense against herbivory: A biochemical perspective, pp. 105–173, in E. A. Bernays (ed.). Insect-Plant Interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  51. Haslam, E. 1986. Secondary metabolism—fact and fiction. Nat. Prod. Rep. 3:217–249.Google Scholar
  52. Herms, D. A., and Mattson, W. J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67:283–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hibi, N., Higashiguchi, S., Hashimoto, T., and Yamada, Y. 1994. Gene expression in tobacco low-nicotine mutants. Plant Cell 6:723–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Karban, R. 1993. Costs and benefits of induced resistance and plant density for a native shrub, Gossypium thurberi. Ecology 74:9–19.Google Scholar
  55. Karban, R., and Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  56. Karban, R., and Myers, J. H. 1989. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:331–348.Google Scholar
  57. Koiwa, H., Bressan, R. A., and Hasegawa, P. M. 1997. Regulation of protease inhibitors and plant defense. TIPS 2:379–383.Google Scholar
  58. Krischik, V. A., Barbosa, P., and Reichelderfer, C. 1988. Three trophic level interactions: Allelochemicals, Manduca sexta (L.), and Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki Berliner. Environ. Entomol. 17:476–482.Google Scholar
  59. Lynds, G. Y., and Baldwin, I. T. 1998. Fire, nitrogen, and defensive plasticity. Oecologia In press.Google Scholar
  60. Malcolm, S. B., and Zalucki, M. P. 1996. Milkweed latex and cardenolide induction may resolve the lethal plant defence paradox. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80:193–196.Google Scholar
  61. Mauricio, R., Rausher, M. D., and Burdick, D. S. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: Are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311.Google Scholar
  62. McCloud, E. S., and Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Herbivory and caterpillar regurgitants amplify the wound-induced increases in jasmonic cid but not nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta 203:430–435.Google Scholar
  63. McKey, D. 1979. The distribution of secondary compounds within plants, pp. 56–133, in G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Janzen (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Mizusaki, S., Tanabe, Y., Noguchi, M., and Tamaki, E. 1973. Activities of ornithine decarboxylase, putrescine N-methyltransferase and N-methylputrescine oxidase in tobacco roots in relation to nicotine biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 14:103–110.Google Scholar
  65. Mole, S. 1994. Trade-offs and constraints in plant-herbivore defense theory: A life-history perspective. Oikos 71:3–12.Google Scholar
  66. Murray, C. L., Quaglia, M., Arnanson, J. T., and Morris, C. E. 1994. A putative nicotine pump at the metabolic blood-brain barrier of the tobacco hornworm. J. Neurobiol. 25:23–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Nowacki, E., Jurzysta, M., Gorski, P., Nowacka, D., and Waller, G. R. 1976. Effect of nitrogen nutrition on alkaloidd metabolism in plants. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen 169:231–240.Google Scholar
  68. Ohnmeiss, T. E., and Baldwin, I. T. 1994. The allometry of nitrogen allocation to growth and an inducible defense under nitrogen-limtied growth. Ecology 75:995–1002.Google Scholar
  69. Ohnmeiss, T., McCloud, E. S., Lynds, G. Y., and Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Within-plant relationships among wounding, jasmonic acid, and nicotine: Implications for defense in Nicotiana sylvestris. new Phytol. 137:441–452.Google Scholar
  70. Parr, J. C., and Thurston, R. 1972. Toxicity of nicotine in synthetic diets to larvae of the tobacco hornworm. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65:1185–1188.Google Scholar
  71. Pigliucci, M., Schlichting, C. D., Jones, C. S., and Schwenk, K. 1996. Developmental reaction norms: The interaction among allometry, ontogeny and plasticity. Plant Spec. Biol. 11:69–85.Google Scholar
  72. Preston, C. A., and Baldwin, I. T. 1999. Positive and negative signals regulate germination in the post-fire annual, Nicotiana attenuata. Ecology In press.Google Scholar
  73. Rabe, E. 1990. The functional significance of the accumulation of nitrogen-containing compounds. J. Hortic. Sci. 65:231–243.Google Scholar
  74. Rusher, M. D. 1996. Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemies. Trends Genet. 12:212–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Reeve, H. K., and Sherman, P. W. 1993. Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Q. Rev. Biol. 68:1–32.Google Scholar
  76. Rosenthal, J. P., and Kotanen, P. M. 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. TREE 9:145–148.Google Scholar
  77. Rowell-Rathier, M., and Pasteels, J. M. 1992. Third trophic level influences of plant allelochemical, pp. 243–277, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  78. Saunders, J. W., and Bush, L. P. 1979. Nicotine biosynthetic enzyme activities in Nicotiana tabacum genotypes with different alkaloids levels. Plant Physiol. 64:236–240.Google Scholar
  79. Scheiner, S. M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasiticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:35–68.Google Scholar
  80. Schlichting, C. D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:667–693.Google Scholar
  81. Schmitt, J., McCormac, A. C., and Smith, H. 1995. A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbors. Am. Nat. 146:937–953.Google Scholar
  82. Self, L. S., and Guthrie, F. E. 1964. Adaptation of tobacco hornworms to the ingestion of nicotine. J. Insect Physiol. 10:907–914.Google Scholar
  83. Simms, E. L. 1992. Costs of plant resistance to herbivores, pp. 392–425 in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms, (eds.). Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  84. Smiley, J. T., Horn, J. M., and Rank, N. E. 1985. Ecological effects of salicin at three trophic levels: New problems from old adaptations. Science 229:649–651.Google Scholar
  85. Snyder, M. J., and Glendinning, J. I. 1996. Causal connection between detoxification enzyme activity and consumption of a toxic plant compound. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 179:255–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Srauss, S. Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78:1640–1645.Google Scholar
  87. Sultan, S. E. 1992. Phenotypic plasticity and the neo-Darwinian legacy. Evol. Trends Plant 6:61–71.Google Scholar
  88. Takabayashi, J., and Dicke, M. 1996. Plant-carnivore mutualism through herbivore-induced carnivore attractants. TIPS 1:109–113.Google Scholar
  89. Tallamy, D. W., and Raupp, M. J. 1991. Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  90. Thompson, J. 1991. Phenotypic plasticity as a component of evolutionary change. TREE 6:246–249.Google Scholar
  91. Tuomi, J., NiemelÄ, P., Haukioja, E., SirÉn, S., and Neuvonen, S. 1984. Nutrient stress: An explanation for plant anti-herbivore responses to defoliation. Oecologia 61:208–210.Google Scholar
  92. Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H., and Lewis, W. J. 1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253.Google Scholar
  93. Turlings, T. C. J., Loughrin, J. H., McCall, P. J., RÖse, U. S. R., Lewis, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1995. How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:4169–4174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. van Dam, N. M., and Baldwin, I. T. 1998. Costs of jasmonate-induced responses in plants competing for limited resources. Ecol. Lett. In press.Google Scholar
  95. van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M., and Verkaar, H. J. 1988. Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355–363.Google Scholar
  96. Wagner, R., Feth, F., and Wagner, K. G. 1986. The regulation of enzyme activities of the nicotine pathway in tobacco. Physiol. Plant. 68:667–672.Google Scholar
  97. Wasternack, C., and Parthier, B. 1997. Jasmonate-signalled plant gene expression. TIPS 2:302–307.Google Scholar
  98. Weiler, E. W. 1997. Octadecanoid-mediated signal transduction in higher plants. Naturwissenschaften 84:340–349.Google Scholar
  99. Zangerl, A. R., and Bazzaz, F. A. 1992. Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation, pp. 363–391, in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms (eds.). Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens. Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  100. Zhang, Z.-P., and Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Transport of [2-14C]jasmonic acid from leaves to roots mimics wound-induced changes in endogenous jasmonic acid pools in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta 203:436–441.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian T. Baldwin
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische ÖkologieJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations