Intraspecific phenotypic variation associated with nuclear DNA content in Lolium perenne L.
- 136 Downloads
The variation in nuclear DNA content and its association with phenotypic traits were examined in 15 cultivated populations of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), including herbage and turf populations. Nuclear DNA contents of 15 populations were measured by a flow cytometric method using DAPI (4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) as a fluorochrome. DNA contents were also measured using PI (propidium iodide) for six populations that showed large differences in DAPI values to confirm the difference. There were significant differences in nuclear DNA contents among the populations for both dyes. Of the total variation in nuclear DNA content measured with DAPI, 29% was ascribed to the inter-population variation, 46% was ascribed to the intra-population variation, 24% was ascribed to the random error variation. Herbage populations tended to have larger DNA content than did turf populations. 2C DNA content was positively correlated with cell size, seed size and single leaf size, although significant correlations were mainly due to a small number of populations with large and small DNA contents. These results suggest that intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content plays important roles in determining phenotypic differences between cultivated populations of L. perenne.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bennett, M.D. & J.B. Smith, 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperm. Philos T Roy Soc B 274: 227–274.Google Scholar
- Campbell, B.D., J.R. Caradus & C.L. Hunt, 1999. Temperature responses and nuclear DNA amounts of seven white clover populations which differ in early spring growth rates. New Zeal J Agric Res 42: 9–17.Google Scholar
- Cavalier-Smit, T., 1985. Cell volume and the evolution of eukaryoto genome size. In: T. Cavalier-Smith (Ed.), The Evolution of Genome Size, pp. 105–184. John Wiley & Sons, London.Google Scholar
- Dolezel, J., J. Greilhuber, S. Lucretti, M.A. Lyska & L. Nardi, 1998. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 82 (suppl.): 17–26.Google Scholar
- Greilhuber, J., 1998. Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Ann Bot 82 (Suppl.): 27–35.Google Scholar
- Minelli, S., P. Moscariello, M. Ceccarelli & P.G. Cionini, 1996. Nucleotype and phenotype in Vicia faba. Heredity 76: 524–530.Google Scholar
- Ohr, D., 1998. Genome size variation and plant systematics. Ann Bot 82 (Suppl.): 75–83.Google Scholar
- Price, H.J., K. Bachman, K.L. Chambers & J. Riggs, 1980. Detection of intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content in Microseris douglastii. Bot Gaz 12: 156–159.Google Scholar
- Price, H.J., 1988. Nuclear DNA content variation within angiosperm species. Evol Trend Plant 2: 53–60.Google Scholar
- Rayburn, A.L., J.A. Auger, A. Benzinger & A.G. Hepburn 1989. Detection of intraspecific DNA content variation in Zea mays L. by flow cytometry. J Exp Bot 40: 1179–1183.Google Scholar
- Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, G.L., 1971 Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold, New York.Google Scholar
- Yamashita, M. & Y. Shimamoto, 1996. Differentiation in freezing hardiness among cultivar groups of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Grassland Sci 42: 57–62 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar