, Volume 133, Issue 1–2, pp 43–57 | Cite as

The History Of Applied Mathematics And The History Of Society

  • Michael Stolz


Choosing the history of statistics and operations research as a casestudy, several ways of setting the development of 20th century appliedmathematics into a social context are discussed. It is shown that there isample common ground between these contextualizations and several recent research programs in general contemporary history. It is argued that a closer cooperation between general historians and historians ofmathematics might further the integration of the internalist andexternalist approaches within the historiography of mathematics.


20th Century Research Program Apply Mathematic Social Context Operation Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bloor, D.: 1976, Knowledge and Social Imagery, London.Google Scholar
  2. Dahan Dalmedico, A.: 1996, ‘L'essor des mathématiques appliquées aux États-Unis: L'impact de la seconde guerre mondiale’, Revue d'histoire des mathématiques 2, 149–213.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, P. N.: 1996, The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Fortun, M. and S. S. Schweber: 1993, ‘Scientists and the Legacy of World War II: The Case of Operations Research (OR)’, Social Studies of Science 23, 595–642.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, G. H. and W. E. Walker: 1994, Operations Research and the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Gemelli, G.: 1997, ‘Les écoles de gestion en France et les fondations américaines (1930–1970)’, Entreprises et histoire 14–15, 11–28.Google Scholar
  7. Gigerenzer, G. et al.: 1989, The Empire of Chance, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Gigerenzer, G. and D. J. Murray: 1987, Cognition as Intuitive Statistics, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Hanle, P. A.: 1982, Bringing Aerodynamics to America, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Hochgeschwender, M.: 1998, Freiheit in der Offensive? Der Kongreß für kulturelle Freiheit und die Deutschen, München.Google Scholar
  11. Hounshell, D.: 1997, ‘The Cold War, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946–1962’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 27, 237–267.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, T. P.: 1998, Rescuing Prometheus, NewYork.Google Scholar
  13. Hunter, P. W.: 1996, ‘Drawing the boundaries: Mathematical statistics in 20th-Century America’, Historia Mathematica 23, 7–30.Google Scholar
  14. Hunter, P. W.: 1999, ‘An unofficial community: American mathematical statisticians before 1935’, Annals of Science 56, 47-68.Google Scholar
  15. Ingrao, B. and G. Israel: 1990, The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Israel, G.: 1996, La mathématisation du réel: essai sur la modélisation mathématique, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Jardini, D.: 1996, Out of the Blue Yonder: The RAND Corporation's Diversification into Social Welfare Research, 1946–1968, Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  18. Jordan, J. M.: 1994, Machine-Age Ideology: Social Engineering and American Liberalism, 1911-1939, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  19. Krohn, C.-D. and P. von zur Mühlen (eds.): 1991, Rückkehr und Aufbau nach 1945: deutsche Remigranten im öffentlichen Leben Nachkriegsdeutschlands, Marburg.Google Scholar
  20. Krüger, L. et al. (eds.): 1987, The Probabilistic Revolution, 2 volumes, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Lax, P. D.: 1989, ‘The flowering of applied mathematics in America’, in P. Duren (ed.), A Century of Mathematics in America, Part II, Providence, RI, pp. 455-466.Google Scholar
  22. Lesourne, J.: 1990, ‘OR and the Social Sciences’, Journal of the Operational Research Society 41, 1–7.Google Scholar
  23. Mazon, B.: 1988, Aux origines de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales: le rôle du mécénat américain (1920–1960), Paris.Google Scholar
  24. McCloskey, J. F.:1987a ‘The Beginnings of Operations Research: 1934–1941’, Operations Research 35, 143–152.Google Scholar
  25. McCloskey, J. F.: 1987b, ‘British Operational Research in World War II’, Operations Research 35, 453–470.Google Scholar
  26. McCloskey, J. F.: 1987c, ‘U.S. Operations Research in World War II’, Operations Research 35, 910-925.Google Scholar
  27. Morgan, M. S.: 1990, The History of Econometric Ideas, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Moutet, A.: 1997, Les logiques de l'entreprise: la rationalisation dans l'industrie française de l'entre-deux-guerres, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. Mac Lane, S.: 1989, ‘The Applied Mathematics Group at Columbia in World War II’, in P. Duren (ed.), A Century of Mathematics in America, Part III, Providence, pp. 495–515.Google Scholar
  30. Owens, L.: 1989, ‘Mathematicians at War: Warren Weaver and the Applied Mathematics Panel, 1942–1945, in D. E. Rowe and J. McCleary (eds.), The History of Modern Mathematics, Volume II: Institutions and Applications, Boston, pp. 287–305.Google Scholar
  31. Porter, T. M.: 1994, ‘The Social Organization of Probability and Statistics’, in I. Grattan-Guinness (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, London, pp. 1392-1398.Google Scholar
  32. Porter, T. M.: 1995, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Prager, W.: 1972, ‘Introductory Remarks’, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 30, 1–9.Google Scholar
  34. Rees, M.: 1980, ‘The Mathematical Sciences and World War II’, The American Mathematical Monthly 87, 607–621.Google Scholar
  35. Reingold, N.: 1981, ‘Refugee Mathematicians in the United States of America’, Annals of Science 38, 313–338.Google Scholar
  36. Restivo, S.: 1992, Mathematics in Society and History, Sociological Inquiries, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenhead, J.: 1989, ‘Operational Research at the Crossroads: Cecil Gordon and the Development of Post-War OR’, Journal of the Operational Research Society 40, 3–28.Google Scholar
  38. Rosser, J. B.: 1982, ‘Mathematics and Mathematicians in World War II’, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 29, 509–515.Google Scholar
  39. Sacks, G.E.: 1989, ‘John Barkley Rosser (1907–1989)’, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 36, 1367.Google Scholar
  40. Sapolsky, H. M.: 1972, The Polaris System Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success in Government, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, B. L.: 1966, The Rand Corporation: Case Study of a Nonprofit Advisory Corporation, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, J. A.: 1991, The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Siegmund-Schultze, R.: 1998, Mathematiker auf der Flucht vor Hitler, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
  44. van Laak, D.: 1999, Weiße Elefanten: Anspruch und Scheitern technischer Großprojekte im 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  45. Wald, A.: 1947, Sequential Analysis, NewYork.Google Scholar
  46. Wallis, W. A.: 1980, ‘The Statistical Research Group, 1942-1945’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, 320–333.Google Scholar
  47. Waring, S. P.: 1991, Taylorism Transformed: Scientific Management Theory since 1945, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Waring, S. P.: 1995, ‘Cold Calculus: The Cold War and Operations Research’, Radical History Review 63, 28–51.Google Scholar
  49. Weintraub, E. R. (ed.): 1992, Toward a History of Game Theory, Durham.Google Scholar
  50. Weintraub, E. R. and P. Mirowski: 1994, ‘The Pure and the Applied: Bourbakism Comes to Mathematical Economics’, Science in Context 7, 245–272.Google Scholar
  51. Willeke, S.: 1995, Die Technokratiebewegung in Nordamerika und Deutschland zwischen den Weltkriegen: eine vergleichende Analyse, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Stolz
    • 1
  1. 1.Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Mathematisches InstitutTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations