Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 373–417 | Cite as

Negation And Negative Concord In Romance

  • Henriëtte De Swart
  • Ivan A. Sag

Abstract

This paper addresses the two interpretations that a combination ofnegative indefinites can get in concord languages like French:a concord reading, which amounts to a single negation, and a doublenegation reading. We develop an analysis within a polyadic framework,where a sequence of negative indefinites can be interpreted as aniteration of quantifiers or via resumption. The first option leadsto a scopal relation, interpreted as double negation. The secondoption leads to the construction of a polyadic negative quantifiercorresponding to the concord reading. Given that sentential negationparticipates in negative concord, we develop an extension of thepolyadic approach which can deal with non-variable binding operators,treating the contribution of negation in a concord context assemantically empty. Our semantic analysis, incorporated into agrammatical analysis formulated in HPSG, crucially relies on theassumption that quantifiers can be combined in more than one wayupon retrieval from the quantifier store. We also considercross-linguistic variation regarding the participation ofsentential negation in negative concord.

Negation concord polarity quantification HPSG French syntax-semantics interface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abeillé, Anne and Danièle Godard: 1997, ‘The Syntax of French Negative Adverbs’, in Paul Hirschbuhler and F. Martineau (eds), Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  2. Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.Google Scholar
  3. Beghelli, Filippo and Tim Stowell: 1997, ‘Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every’ in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 71–197.Google Scholar
  4. van Benthem, Johan: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. van Benthem, Johan: 1989, ‘Polyadic Quantifiers’ Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 437–464.Google Scholar
  6. Bouma, Gosse, Robert Malouf, and Ivan A. Sag: 2001, ‘Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction, Parts I and II’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(1), 1–65.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, Robin: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Corblin, Francis: 1996, ‘Multiple Negation Processing in Natural Language’ Theoria 17, 214–259.Google Scholar
  9. Corblin, Francis and Ivan Derzhansky: 1997, ‘Multiple Negation, Optional Arguments and the Reification of Eventualities’, in Francis Corblin, Danièle Godard and Jean-Marie Marandin (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, Anthony: 2001, Linking by Types in the Hierarchical Lexicon, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  11. Déprez, Viviane: 1997, ‘Two Types of Negative Concord’ Probus 9, 103–143.Google Scholar
  12. Déprez, Viviane: 2000, ‘Parallel (A)symmetries and the Internal Structure of Negative Expressions’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 253–342.Google Scholar
  13. Farkas, Donka and Anastasia Giannikidou: 1995, ‘How Clause-Bounded is the Scope of Universals’ Proceedings of SALT VI, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
  14. Giannikidou, Anastasia: 1998, Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Giannikidou, Anastasia: 2000, ‘Negative ...concord’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 457–523.Google Scholar
  16. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag: 2000, English Interrogative Constructions, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  17. Grevisse, Maurice: 1993, Le Bon Usage (13th revised edition), Duculot, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Haegeman, Liliane: 1995, The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Haegeman, Liliane and Rafaella Zanuttini: 1996, ‘Negative Concord in West Flemish’ in Andrea Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 117–179.Google Scholar
  20. Higginbotham, James and Robert May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’ The Linguistic Review 1, 41–79.Google Scholar
  21. Jespersen, Otto: 1917, ‘Negation in English and Other Languages’ Reprinted in Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen (1962), George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 3–151.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, Michael Allan: 1993, Sardinian Syntax, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  23. Kasper, Robert: ????, ‘The Semantics of Recursive Modification’ unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  24. Kayne, Richard: 1981, ‘ECP-Extensions’ Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371.Google Scholar
  25. Keenan, Edward: 1987, ‘Unreducible n-ary Quantifiers in Natural Language’ in Peter Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 109–150.Google Scholar
  26. Keenan, Edward: 1992, ‘Beyond the Frege Boundary’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 199–221.Google Scholar
  27. Keenan, Edward and Dag Westerståhl: 1997, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic’, in Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 837–893.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, Jongbok and Ivan A. Sag: 1995, ‘The Parametric Variation of English and French Negation’ in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 303–317.Google Scholar
  29. Kim, Jongbok and Ivan A. Sag: in press, ‘Negation without Head Movement’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
  30. Ladusaw, William: 1992, ‘Expressing Negation’ Proceedings of SALT 2, The Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar
  31. Laka Mugarza, Itziar: 1990, Negation in Syntax, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  32. Laka Mugarza, Itziar: 1993, ‘Negative Fronting in Romance’ in William Ashby (ed.), Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 315–333.Google Scholar
  33. Lindström, P.: 1966, ‘First Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers’ Theoria 35: 1–11.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, F.-H.: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  35. Manning, Christopher and Ivan A. Sag: 1998, ‘Argument Structure, Valence, and Binding’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 21, 107–144.Google Scholar
  36. Manning, Christopher, Ivan A. Sag, and Masayo Iida: 1999, ‘The Lexical Integrity of Japanese Causatives’ in Robert Levine and Georgia Green (eds.), Readings in Modern Phrase Structure Grammar, Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–70.Google Scholar
  37. May, Robert: 1989, ‘Interpreting Logical Form’ Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 387–435.Google Scholar
  38. Moltmann, Friederike: 1995, ‘Exception Sentences and Polyadic Quantification’ Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 223–280.Google Scholar
  39. Moltmann, Friederike: 1996, ‘Resumptive Quantifiers in Exception Sentences’ in Makoto Kanazawa, Chris Piñón, and Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Quantifiers, Deduction, and Context, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 139–170.Google Scholar
  40. Muller, Claude: 1991, La Négation en Français, Droz, Genève.Google Scholar
  41. Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag: 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  42. Pollard, Carl and Eun Jung Yoo: 1998, ‘A Unified Theory of Scope for Quantifiers and wh-Phrases’ Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  43. Przepiórkowski, Adam: 1999, Case Assignment and the Complement-Adjunct Dichotomy: A Non-Configurational Constraint-Based Approach, Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Germany.Google Scholar
  44. Przepiórkowski, Adam and Anna Kupść: 1999, ‘Eventuality Negation and Negative Concord in Polish and Italian’ in R. Borsley and A. Przepiórkowski (eds.), Slavic in HPSG, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Richter, Frank and Manfred Sailer: 1999, ‘A Lexicalist Collocation Analysis of Sentential Negation and Negative Concord in French’ Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Universität Tübingen, Germany.Google Scholar
  46. Sag, Ivan A. and Thomas Wasow: 1999, Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction, CSLI Publications, Stanford. Distributed by Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. de Swart, Henriëtte: 1998, ‘La Position de ni dans le système de la négation’ in Denis Delfitto, Jan Schroten, and Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Recherches de Linguistique Française et Romane, Vol. 17, UiL-OTS/Romance Languages, Utrecht, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
  48. de Swart, Henriëtte: 1998, ‘Licensing of Negative Polarity Items under Inverse Scope’ Lingua 105, 175–200.Google Scholar
  49. de Swart, Henriëtte: 2001, ‘Négation et coordination: la conjonction ni’, in Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bob de Jonge, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, and Arie Molendijk (eds.), Adverbial Modification, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
  50. Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997, ‘Strategies for Scope Taking’ in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 109–154.Google Scholar
  51. Vallduví Enric: 1994, ‘Polarity items, n-Words and Minimizers in Catalan and Spanish’ Probus 6, 263–294.Google Scholar
  52. Westerståhl, Dag: 1989, ‘Quantifiers in Formal and Natural Languages’ in Dov Gabbay and Frantz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 4, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–131.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Wouden, Ton: 1997, Negative Contexts. Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  54. Van der Wouden, Ton and Frans Zwarts: 1993, ‘A Semantic Analysis of Negative Concord’ Proceedings of SALT 3, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  55. van der Wouden, Ton: 1994, Negative Contexts, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  56. Warner, Anthony: 1993, English Auxiliaries: Structure and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
  57. Warner, Anthony: 2000, ‘English Auxiliaries without Lexical Rules’ in Robert Borsley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 32: The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories, Academic Press, San Diego and London, pp. 167–220.Google Scholar
  58. Zanuttini, Rafaella: 1991, Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation, Doctoral dissertaton, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henriëtte De Swart
    • 1
  • Ivan A. Sag
    • 2
  1. 1.Uil-OTS & FrenchUtrecht UniversityNetherlands
  2. 2.Linguistics & CSLIStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations