Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 25, Issue 5–6, pp 627–654 | Cite as

Some Properties of Natural Language Quantifiers: Generalized Quantifier Theory

  • Edward Keenan
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Altham, J. E, J. and N. Tennant: 1975, 'Sortal Quantification', in E. K. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 46–58, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, E., E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B. Partee: 1995, Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, 'Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.Google Scholar
  4. Beghelli, F.: 1992, 'Comparative Quantifiers', in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), in Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Beghelli, F.: 1994, 'Structured Quantifiers', in M. Kanazawa and C. Piñon (eds.), pp. 119–145.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Shalom, D.: 2001, 'One Connection Between Standard Invariance Conditions on Modal Formulas and Generalized Quantifiers', Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 1–6.Google Scholar
  7. van Benthem, J.: 1983, 'Questions About Quantifiers', Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 443–466.Google Scholar
  8. van Benthem, J.: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  9. van Benthem, J. and A. ter Meulen: 1985, Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Boolos, G.: 1984, 'Non-First Orderizability Again', Linguistic Inquiry 12, 465–467.Google Scholar
  11. van der Does, J. and J. van Eijck (1996) Quantifiers, Logic, and Language, CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Doetjes, J. and M. Honcoop: 1997, 'The Semantics of Event-Related Readings: A Case for Pair Quantification', in Szabolcsi 1997, pp. 263–297.Google Scholar
  13. Etchemendy, J.: 1990, The Concept of Logical Consequence, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fauconnier, G.: 1975, 'Polarity and the Scale Principle', Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Frege, G. 1892, 'On Concept and Object', in P. Geach and M. Black, Translations from the Writings of Gottlob Frege, 1952. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Gabbay, D. and J. Moravcsik: 1974, 'Branching Quantifiers and Montague Grammar', Theoretical Linguistics 1, 139–157.Google Scholar
  17. Gärdenfors, P.: 1987, Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Gil, D.: 1995, Universal Quantifiers and Distributivity, in E. Bach et al. (eds). pp. 321–363.Google Scholar
  19. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1997, 'Questions', in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Linguistics, North Holland, pp. 1055–1125.Google Scholar
  20. Gutierrez-Rexach, J.: 1997, 'Questions and Generalized Quantifiers', in Szabolcsi 1997, pp. 409–453.Google Scholar
  21. Heim, I. and A. Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Higginbotham, J. and R. May: 1981,'Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing', Linguistic Review 1, 41–79.Google Scholar
  23. Hintikka, J.: 1973, 'Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory', Dialectica 27, 329–358 reprinted in Linguistic Inquiry 5, 153–177.Google Scholar
  24. Jelinek, L.: 1995, 'Quantification in Straits Salish', in E. Bach (ed.). pp. 487–540.Google Scholar
  25. Kanazawa J. and C. Piñon: 1994, Dynamics, Polarity and Quantification, CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford.Google Scholar
  26. Kaplan, D.: 1966, 'Rescher's Plurality-Quantification and Generalized Plurality Quantification' (abstract), J. Symbolic Logic 31, 153–154.Google Scholar
  27. Keenan, E. L.: 1981, 'A Boolean Approach to Semantics', in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, pp. 343–379. Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  28. Keenan, E. L.: 1987, 'A Semantic Definition of “Indefinite NP” ', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)Definiteness, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Keenan, E. L.: 1989, 'Semantic Case Theory', in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual, Foris.Google Scholar
  30. Keenan, E. L.: 1992, 'Beyond the Frege Boundary', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 199–221.Google Scholar
  31. Keenan, E. L: 1993, 'Natural Language, Sortal Reducibility and Generalized Quantifiers', The Journal Symbolic Logi 58, 314–325.Google Scholar
  32. Keenan, E. L.: 1996, 'The Semantics of Determiners', in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic, Blackwell, pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
  33. Keenan, E. L.: 2001, 'A Semantic Characterization of the Definiteness Effect', MS, UCLA.Google Scholar
  34. Keenan, E. L. and L. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  35. Keenan, E L. and L. Moss: 1985, 'Generalized Quantifiers and the Expressive power of Natural Language', in J. van Bethem and A. ter Meulen (eds.).Google Scholar
  36. Keenan, E. L. and J. Stavi: 1986, 'A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners', Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326.Google Scholar
  37. Keenan, E. L. and D. Westerståhl: 1997, 'Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic', in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Logic, pp. 837–893, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  38. Kolaitis, Ph. and J. Väänänen: 1995, 'Generalized Quantifiers and Pebble Games on Finite Structures', Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 74, 23–75.Google Scholar
  39. Krifka, M.: 1989, 'Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantic', in R. Bartsch and J. van Benthem and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression pp. 75–117, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  40. Krifka, M.: 1990, 'Four Thousand Ships Passed through the Lock', in Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 487–520.Google Scholar
  41. Krynicki, M., M. Mostowski, and L. Szczerba: 1995, Quantifiers: Logics, Models and Computation, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  42. Ladusaw, W.: 1983, 'Logical Form and Conditions on Grammaticality', Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 389–422.Google Scholar
  43. Lindström, P.: 1966, 'First Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers', Theoria 35, 186–195.Google Scholar
  44. Lønning, J. T.: 1997, 'Plurals and Collectivity', in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Logic, pp. 1011–1059. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  45. Matthewson, L.: 2001, 'Quantification and the Nature of Crosslinguistic Variation', Natural Language Semantics 9, 145–189.Google Scholar
  46. ter Meulen, A.: 1990, 'English Aspectual Verbs as Generalized Quantifiers', in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium Part 1, ITLI, Amsterdam. pp. 303–317.Google Scholar
  47. Milsark, G.: 1977, 'Towards an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities in the Existential Construction in English', Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
  48. Montague, R.: 1969, 'English as a Formal Language'. Reprinted in R. Thomason, 1974, 188–222. In Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Montague, R.: 1973, 'The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English'. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy 247–270. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  50. Mostowski, A.: 1957, 'On a Generalization of Quantifiers', Fundamenta Mathematicae 44, 12–36.Google Scholar
  51. Nam S.: 1994, 'Another Type of Negative Polarity Item', in M. Kanazawa and C. Piñon (eds.), pp. 3–17, CSLIGoogle Scholar
  52. Partee, B.: 1984, 'Nominal and Temporal Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.Google Scholar
  53. Partee, B.: 1987, 'Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles', in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, GRASS 8, Foris, pp.115–143.Google Scholar
  54. Smessaert, H.: 1996, 'Monotonicity Properties of Comparative Determiners', Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 295–336.Google Scholar
  55. Stabler, E.: 1997, 'Computing Quantifier Scope', in Szabolcsi 1997, pp. 155–179.Google Scholar
  56. de Swart, H.: 1996, 'Quantification Over Time', in van der Does and van Eijck, pp. 311–337.Google Scholar
  57. Szabolcsi, A.: 1997a, Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  58. Szabolcsi, A.: 1997b, 'Strategies for Scope Taking', in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), pp. 109–155.Google Scholar
  59. Verkuyl, H. and J. van der Does: 1996, 'The Semantics of Plural Noun Phrases', in van der Does and van Eijck, pp. 337–375.Google Scholar
  60. Vieira, M. D.: 1995, 'The Expression of Quantificational Notions in Asurini do Trocara', in Bach et al., pp. 701–720.Google Scholar
  61. Westerståhl, D: 1985, 'Logical Constants in Quantifier Languages', Linguistics & Philosophy 8, 387–413.Google Scholar
  62. Westerståhl, D.: 1989, 'Quantifiers in Formal Natural Languages', in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), The Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. IV, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–131.Google Scholar
  63. Westerståhl, D.: 1991, 'Relativization of Quantifiers in Finite Models', in J. van der Does and J. van Eijck (eds.), Generalized Quantifier Theory and Applications, Institute of Logic, Language and Information, Amsterdam, pp. 187–205.Google Scholar
  64. Winter, Y.: 1998, Flexible Boolean Semantics: Coordination, Plurality and Scope in Natural Language, Ph.D. diss. Utrecht University. To appear (revised) with MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Keenan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUCLALos Angeles

Personalised recommendations