The Effectiveness of the Assertive Community Treatment Model

  • Evelyn J. Nieves


This study sought to determine the benefits of an assertive community treatment model (ACT) versus a continuing day-treatment program (CDTP) for the treatment of chronic mentally ill patients. The study utilized a quasi-experimental design with a matched-groups comparison of outcomes achieved by patients in two community mental health centers in the South Bronx area of New York City. The study assessed outcomes regarding hospital readmissions, quality of life, and housing and vocational rehabilitation. The sample size was 60, with 30 subjects in each group. Due to the small size and baseline differences between groups, nonparametric tests were the primary statistical analyses.

assertive community treatment continuity of care approach continuity of caregiver approach program fidelity psychiatric inpatient returnee 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Frey, J.L., Knoedler, W., Test, M.A., & Stein, L.I. (1998). Pact team: Model fidelity assessment.Google Scholar
  3. Macias, C. (1996). Fountain House, Inc., 425 West 47th Street, New York, NY 10036; and International Center for Clubhouse Development, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Macias, C., & Teague, G.B. (1992, June). Preliminary concepts for participant observer ratings of community support programs. Paper presented at the Community Support Program Demonstration Project Workshop, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  5. New York State Office of Mental Health (1995). 1995 Patient characteristics survey.Google Scholar
  6. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1993). Research methods for social work (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Test, M.A., & Stein, L.I. (1980). Alternatives to mental hospital treatment social cost. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 409–412.Google Scholar
  8. Weinbach, R.W., & Grinnell, R.M. (1991). Statistics for social workers (2nd ed.). New York: Longman Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  9. Yegidis, B.L., & Weinbach, R.W. (1991). Research methods for social workers. New York: Longman Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evelyn J. Nieves
    • 1
  1. 1.Fordham-Tremont Community Mental Health CenterBronx

Personalised recommendations