Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 175–192 | Cite as

Posing as Professor: Laterality in Posing Orientation for Portraits of Scientists

  • Carel ten CateEmail author


Posing orientation on portraits generally, but not always, shows a left-cheek bias. Different posing orientations may convey different messages, due to lateralization in facial expression of emotions. Right-cheeked posing orientation is expected to dominate on portraits aimed at communicating rationality. This study examines (1) the posing orientation on portraits of university professors, and (2) the impact of orientation on how ‘scientific’ viewers judged these professors to be. Older portraits show a clear right-cheek bias. Later portraits show a left-cheek bias, which may be related to their less formal nature. Normal and mirror-reversed portraits by two 18th century painters were perceived as equally scientific. However, right-cheeked originals were perceived as more scientific than left-cheeked ones. The findings support the hypothesis that biases in portrait orientation are affected by facial asymmetry in communicating different emotions.

emotion facial expression lateralization perception portrait posing orientation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous (1973). Icones Leidenses. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.Google Scholar
  2. Benjafield, J., & Segalowitz, S.J. (1993). Left and right in Leonardo's drawings of faces. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 25-32.Google Scholar
  3. Borod, J.C., Haywood, C.S., & Koff, E. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: A review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychology Review, 7, 41-60.Google Scholar
  4. Cellius, E. (1596). Imagines Professorum Tubingensium. Reprinted 1981. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, A.C., German, C., & Zaidel, D.W. (1997). Brain asymmetry and facial attractiveness: Facial beauty is not simply in the eye of the beholder. Neuropsychologia, 35, 471-476.Google Scholar
  6. Coles, P.R. (1974). Profile orientation and social distance in portrait painting. Perception, 3, 303-308.Google Scholar
  7. Conesa, J., Brunold-Conesa, C., & Miron, M. (1995). Incidence of the half-left profile pose in single-subject portraits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 920-922.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, M., Menzani, M., & Bitti, P.E.R. (2001). Head canting in paintings: An historical study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 63-73.Google Scholar
  9. Ekkart, R.E.O. (1977). Franeker professorenportretten. Franeker: Wever.Google Scholar
  10. Ekkart, R.E.O., & Schuller tot Peursum-Meijer, J. (1978). Groninger Academieportretten. Groningen: Van der Kamp.Google Scholar
  11. Freimuth, M., & Wapner, S. (1979). The influence of lateral organization on the evaluation of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 211-218.Google Scholar
  12. Gaffron, M. (1962). Perceptual experience: An analysis of its relation to the external world through internal processings. In S. Koch (Ed.), A study of a Science, 4 (pp. 562-618). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Grüsser, O.-J., Selke, T., & Zynda, B. (1988). Cerebral lateralization and some implications for art, aesthetic perception, and artistic creativity. In I. Rentschler (Ed.), Beauty and the brain (pp. 257-293). Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  14. Hauser, M.D. (1993). Right hemisphere dominance for the production of facial expression in monkeys. Science, 261, 475-477.Google Scholar
  15. Hauser, M.D., & Akre, K. (2001). Asymmetries in the timing of facial and vocal expressions by rhesus monkeys: Implications for hemispheric specialization. Animal Behaviour, 61, 391-400.Google Scholar
  16. Humphrey, N., & McManus, C. (1973). Status and the left cheek. New Scientist, 59, 437-439.Google Scholar
  17. LaBar, M. (1973). Turning the left cheek examined using modern photography. Nature, 245, 338.Google Scholar
  18. Latto, R. (1996). Turning the other cheek: Profile direction in self-portraiture. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 89-98.Google Scholar
  19. Mattingley, J.B., Bradshaw, J.L., Nettleton, N.C., & Bradshaw, J.A. (1994). Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect? Neuropsychologia, 32, 805-817.Google Scholar
  20. McLaughlin, J.P., & Murphy, K.E. (1994). Preference for profile orientation in portraits. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 1-7.Google Scholar
  21. McManus, I.C., & Humphrey, N.K. (1973). Turning the left cheek. Nature, 243, 271-272.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, T.M., & Mac Donald, G.A (1971). Lateral organization, perceived depth and title preference in pictures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 983-986.Google Scholar
  23. Nicholls, M.E.R., Clode, D., Wood, S.J., & Wood, A.G. (1999). Laterality of expression in portraiture: Putting your best cheek forward. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 266, 1517-1522.Google Scholar
  24. Schirillo, J.A. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries and gender influence Rembrandt's portrait orientations. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1593-1606.Google Scholar
  25. Teeuwisse, J.B.J. (1991). Utrechtse universiteitsportretten. Zutphen: Walburg Pers.Google Scholar
  26. Uhrbrock, R.S. (1973). Laterality in Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32, 27-35.Google Scholar
  27. van Regteren Altena, I.Q., & van Thiel, P.J.J. (1964). De portret-galerij van de Universiteit van Amsterdam en haar stichter Gerard van Papenbroeck 1673-1743. Amsterdam.: Swets en Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  28. Wolff, W. (1933). The experimental study of forms of expression. Character and Person, 2, 168-173.Google Scholar
  29. Zaidel, D.W., Chen, A.C., & German, C. (1995). She is not a beauty even when she smiles: Possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia, 33, 649-655.Google Scholar
  30. Zaidel, D.W., & Fitzgerald, P. (1994). Sex of the face in Western art: Left and right in portraits. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 9-18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological SciencesLeiden UniversityRA Leidenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations