Journal for General Philosophy of Science

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

The ‘Platforms’ for Comparing Incommensurable Taxonomies: A Cognitive-Historical Analysis

  • Xiang Chen

Abstract

This paper examines taxonomy comparison from a cognitive perspective. Arguments are developed by drawing on the results of cognitive psychology, which reveal the cognitive mechanisms behind the practice of taxonomy comparison. The taxonomic change in 19th-century ornithology is also used to uncover the historical practice that ornithologists employed in the revision of the classification of birds. On the basis of cognitive and historical analyses, I argue that incommensurable taxonomies can be compared rationally. Using a frame model to represent taxonomy, I show how rational comparisons were achieved in the historical case through compatible contrast sets and attribute lists. Through analyzing the cognitive processes of classification and concept representation, I further explain how rival taxonomies in the historical case could be rationally compared on ‘platforms’ rooted in such cognitive mechanisms as relational assumptions and preferences for body parts in conceptual processing.

Kuhn incommensurability taxonomy theory choice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Andersen, H., Barker, P. and Chen, X.: 1996, 'Kuhn's Mature Philosophy of Science and Cognitive Psychology', Philosophical Psychology 9, 347-363.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, S.: 1858, Birds. Reports of Explorations and Surveys, to Ascertain the Most Practicable and Economic Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, Vol. 9, Part 2, B. Tucker, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Barsalou, L.: 1992, 'Frames, Concepts, and Conceptual Fields', in A. Lehrer and E. Kittay (eds), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantical and Lexical Organization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 21-74.Google Scholar
  4. Barsalou, L.: 1999a, 'Perceptual Symbol Systems', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577-609.Google Scholar
  5. Barsalou, L.: 1999b, 'Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 637-660.Google Scholar
  6. Barsalou, L. and Hale, C.: 1993, 'Components of Conceptual Representation: From Featurelists to Recursive Frames', in I. Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski and P. Theuns (eds), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, Academic Press, New York, pp. 97-144.Google Scholar
  7. Barsalou, L., Solomon, K. and Wu, L.: 1999, 'Perceptual Simulation in Conceptual Tasks', in M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds), Cultural, Typological, and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics: the Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 3, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 209-228.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, C.: 1976, 'General Principles of Human Anatomical Partonomy and Speculations on the Growth of Partonomic Nomenclature', American Ethnologist 3, 400-424.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, X.: 1994, 'Why Do Scientists Have Disagreements about Experiment?: Incommensurability in the Use of Goalderived Categories', Perspectives on Science 2, 275-301.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, X.: 1997, 'Thomas Kuhn's Latest Notion of Incommensurability', Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28, 257-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, X., Andersen, H. and Barker, P.: 1998, 'Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Revolutions and Cognitive Psychology', Philosophical Psychology 11, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, X. and Barker, P.: 2000, 'Continuity Through Revolutions: A Framebased Account of Conceptual Change During Scientific Revolutions', Philosophy of Science 67, 208-223. 22 XIANG CHENCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farber, P.: 1997, The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760-1850, D. Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Gadow, H.: 1892, 'On the Classification of Birds', Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1892, 229-256.Google Scholar
  15. Grandy, R.: 1992, 'Semantic Fields, Prototypes, and the Lexicon', in A. Lehrer and E. Kittay (eds), Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 103-122.Google Scholar
  16. Hull, D.: 1988, Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Kay, P.: 1971, 'Taxonomy and Semantic Contrast', Language 47, 866-887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T.: 1989, 'Possible Worlds in History of Science', in S. Allen (ed.), Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences, Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp. 9-32.Google Scholar
  19. Kuhn, T.: 1990, 'An Historian's Theory of Meaning', Talk to cognitive science colloquium, UCLA. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, T.: 1991, 'The Road since Structure', in A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds), PSA 1990, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 3-13.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T.: 1993, 'Afterwords', in P. Horwich (ed.), World Changes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 311-341.Google Scholar
  22. Newton, A.: 1893, A Dictionary of Birds, Adam and Charles Black, London.Google Scholar
  23. Parker, W. K.: 1863, 'On the Systematic Position of the Crested Screamers (Palamedea Chavaria)', Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 4, 511-518.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, H.: 1975, 'The Meaning of 'Meaning'', in K. Gunderson (ed.),Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 215-271.Google Scholar
  25. Ray, J.: 1678, The Ornithology of Francis Willughby, John Martyn, London.Google Scholar
  26. Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D. and Boyes-Braem, P.: 1976,'Basic Objects in Natural Categories', Cognitive Psychology 8, 382-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sibley, C. and Ahlquist, J.: 1990, Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  28. Stresemann, E.: 1975, Ornithology: From Aristotle to the Present, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Sundevall, C.: 1889, Sundevall's Tentamen, Porter, London.Google Scholar
  30. Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K.: 1984, Objects, Parts, and Categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 169-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winston, M., Chaffin, R. and Herrmann, D.: 1987, 'A Taxonomy of Partwhole Relations', Cognitive Science 11, 417-444. Department of Philosophy California Lutheran University 60 West Olsen Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91360–2787 USACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiang Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCalifornia Lutheran UniversityThousand OaksUSA

Personalised recommendations