Advertisement

Environmentalist

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 319–324 | Cite as

The Prospect of Municipal Waste Landfill Diversion Depends on Geographical Location

Article

Abstract

This study reports on experimentation with municipal and industrial solid waste in Brazil, on mutual inspection of municipal sanitation models in selected Spanish and Brazilian towns, and on observations of municipal solid waste (MSW) management models effective in Argentina, Great Britain, Sweden, and Germany. The diversity of management strategies inhibits technology transfer. Judging by the models inspected, Sweden and Germany appear to be best prepared for stricter European landfill diversion targets in the near future. Experimentation in Brazil has resulted in a proactive MSW management model based on divided collection, which achieves 80 percent landfill diversion. This result, surprisingly, meets and exceeds European diversion targets in a South American context. As the gap in strategy and target narrows between South America and Europe, both technology and management methods may gain intercontinental mobility and thus enhance commercial ties between the two markets in the specific branch of MSW management.

divided collection landfill diversion sanitation models solid waste waste disposal waste management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calvo, R.F., Szanto, N.M., Muñoz, J.J. (1998) MSW management situation in Latin America (in Spanish). Residuos Revista Técnica, Bilbao 8(43), 70–6.Google Scholar
  2. CELADE. (1999) Demographic Bulletin No. 62 for Economically Active Population. Santiago: Latin-American and Caribbean Demographic Center, www.popnet.org.Google Scholar
  3. Fehr, M. (1999a) The dynamic nature of MSW management. J. Environmental Systems 27(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. Fehr, M. (1999b) Verification of the environmental matrix of a Spanish municipality (in Spanish), Cooperative project supported by AECI, Madrid, final report.Google Scholar
  5. Fehr, M. and Calçado, M.d.R. (2001) Divided collection model for household waste achieves 80% landfill diversion. The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, Chester 27(1), 22–26.Google Scholar
  6. Fehr, M. and Castro, M.S.M.V.d. (1999) Household waste analysis induces management model (in Portuguese). Saneamento Ambiental, São Paulo 10(55), 38–41.Google Scholar
  7. Fehr, M., Calçado, M.d.R., Romão, D.C. (1999) Landfill diversion of biodegradables seen and solved as an administrative challenge. First Internet Conference on Material Flow Analysis of Integrated Bio-Systems, United Nations University, March to October 2000, paper P6-4.Google Scholar
  8. GEDESMA. (1998) Selective collection of used packaging material in Madrid (in Spanish). Residuos Revista Técnica, Bilbao 8(43), 56–8.Google Scholar
  9. IBGE. (1997) Brazil in numbers (in Portuguese) 5, pp. 1–137, Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.Google Scholar
  10. Read, A.D. (1999) A weekly doorstep recycling collection, I had no idea we could. Resources Conservation and Recycling 26(3-4), 217–49.Google Scholar
  11. Roggio-Ormas. (1997) Environmental engineering group, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, institutional video.Google Scholar
  12. Sakai, S., Sawell, S.E., Chandler, A.J., Eighmy, T.T., Kosson, D.S., Vehlow, J., van der Sloot, H.A., Hartlen, J., Hjelmar, O.(1996) World trends in MSW management. Waste Management, Skaneateles 16(5), 341–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Fehr
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal UniversityUberlandiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations