Asia-Pacific Financial Markets

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 321–339 | Cite as

Does the Momentum Strategy Work Universally? Evidence from the Japanese Stock Market

  • Chunlin Liu
  • Yul Lee
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates effectiveness of momentum strategies in the Japanese stock market during the period of 1975 to 1997. The main findings of this research are that momentum strategy portfolios which invest in past three-to-twelve month winners and sell past three-to-twelve month losers lose about 0.5% per month over the subsequent three to twelve months. This means that stock prices in the Japanese stock market reverse rather than continue over a medium-term horizon. The most significant reversal pattern is observed at the first month of portfolio formation and is unique to small stocks. Even with the market risk and size factor controlled, the price reversal is still present.

contrarian strategy Japanese stock market momentum strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, R., Kothari, S., and Shanken, J. (1995) Problems in measuring portfolio performance: An application to contrarian investment strategies, J. Financ. Econom. 38, 79-107.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, W. (1989) The market for Japanese stock index futures: Some preliminary evidence, J. Futures Markets 9, 283-295.Google Scholar
  3. Brenner, M., Subrahmanyam, M., and Uno, J. (1989) The behavior of prices in the Nikkei spot and futures markets, J. Financ. Econom. 25, 363-384.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, K. C. (1988) On contrarian investment strategy, J. Busin. 61, 147-163.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, R., McLeavey, D., and Rhee, S. (1995) Short-term abnormal returns of the contrarian strategy in the Japanese Stock Market, J. Busin. Finance Account. 22 (7), 1035-1048.Google Scholar
  6. Conrad, J. and Kaul, G. (1988) Mean reversion in short-horizon expected returns, Rev. Financ. Stud. 2, 225-240.Google Scholar
  7. Conrad, J. and Kaul, G. (1998) An anatomy of trading strategies, Rev. Financ. Stud. 11, 489-519.Google Scholar
  8. Copeland, T. and Mayers, D. (1982) The value line enigma (1965-1978): A case study of performance evaluation issues, J. Financ. Econom. 10, 289-321.Google Scholar
  9. DeBondt, W. and Thaler, R. (1985) Does the stock market overreact? J. Finance 40, 793-805.Google Scholar
  10. DeBondt, W. and Thaler, R. (1987) Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality, J. Finance 42, 557-581.Google Scholar
  11. Fama, E. and French, K. (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies, J. Finance 51, 55-84.Google Scholar
  12. Hendricks, D., Patel, J., and Zechhauser, R. (1993) Hot hands in mutual funds: Short-run persistence of relative performance, 1974-1988, J. Finance 48, 93-130.Google Scholar
  13. Jegadeesh, N. (1990) Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns, J. Finance 45, 881-898.Google Scholar
  14. Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, J. Finance 48, 65-91.Google Scholar
  15. Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1995) Overreaction, delayed reaction, and contrarian profits, Rev. Financ. Stud. 8, 973-993.Google Scholar
  16. Lehmann, B. (1990) Fads, martingales and market efficiency, Quart. J. Econom. 105, 1-28.Google Scholar
  17. Lo, A. and MacKinlay, C. (1990) When are contrarian profits due to stock market overreaction? Rev. Financ. Stud. 3, 175-206.Google Scholar
  18. Richards, A. J. (1997) Winner-loser reversals in national stock market indices: Can they be explained? J. Finance 52, 2129-2134.Google Scholar
  19. Rouwenhorst, K. (1998) International momentum strategies, J. Finance 53, 267-284.Google Scholar
  20. Yoshihara, M. (1990) Testing the over reaction hypothesis in Japanese stock market (in Japanese), Japanese Financial Analyst J. 28, 21-29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunlin Liu
    • 1
  • Yul Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.FleetBoston FinancialProvidenceU.S.A.
  2. 2.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations