Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 111–129 | Cite as

An Assessment of Empirical Model Performance When Financial Market Transactions are Observed at Different Data Frequencies: An Application to East Asian Exchange Rates

  • Kai-Li Wang
  • Chris Fawson
  • Christopher B. Barrett


This paper compares the performance of alternative models of east Asian exchange rates at different data frequencies. Selected models employ different specifications of the conditional variance and the conditional error distribution. Conditional variance specifications include: homoscedasticity, GARCH, LGARCH, and EGARCH. Conditional error distribution specifications include normal and Student t. The best exchange rate model specification is clearly conditional on data frequency. Higher frequency (daily, weekly) data commonly exhibit characteristics that demand more sophisticated estimation methods than analysts commonly employ. These characteristics generally vanish at lower (monthly, quarterly) frequencies. Overall we find significant benefit from accommodating heteroscedasticity and leptokurtic properties of the conditional distribution as data frequency increases. Using a likelihood ratio test we compare the relative gain from addressing heteroscedasticity (through use of GARCH models) versus accommodation of leptokurtosis. This comparison suggests that the gains from correct specification of the conditional distribution dominate those obtained from addressing problems of heteroscedasticity.

exchange rates data frequency GARCH distributions leptokurtosis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baillie, R. T. and R. P. DeGennaro, “The Impact of Delivery Terms on Stock ReturnVolatility.” Journal of Financial Service Research 3, 55-76, (1990).Google Scholar
  2. Baillie, R. T. and T. Bollerslev, “The Message in Daily Exchange Rates: A Conditional-Variance Tale.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 297-305, (1989).Google Scholar
  3. Baillie, R. T. and T. Bollerslev, “Predictions in Dynamic Models with Time Dependent Conditional Variances.” Journal of Econometrics 52, 91-113, (1992).Google Scholar
  4. Baillie, R. T., T. Bollerslev and H. O. Mikkelsen, “Fractionally Integrated Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 74, 3-30, (1996).Google Scholar
  5. Bank for International Settlements, Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity, Basle: BIS, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Bera, A. K. and M. L. Higgins, “ARCH Models: Properties, Estimation and Testing.” Journal of Economic Surveys 7, 306-365, (1993).Google Scholar
  7. Berndt, E. K., B. H. Hall, R. E. Hall and J. A. Hausman, “Estimation Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models.” Annuals of Economic and Social Measurement 4, 653-665, (1974).Google Scholar
  8. Bollerslev, T., “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 3, 307-327, (1986).Google Scholar
  9. Bollerslev, T., “A Conditional Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Price and Rate of Return.” Review of Economics and Statistics 9, 542-547, (1987).Google Scholar
  10. Bollerslev, T., R. Y. Chou and K. F. Kroner, “ARCH Modeling in Finance.” Journal of Econometrics 52, 5-59, (1992).Google Scholar
  11. Boothe, P. and D. Glassman, “The Statistical Distribution of Exchange Rates.” Journal of International Economics 22, 297-319, (1987).Google Scholar
  12. Brock, W. A. and B. D. LeBaron, “A Dynamic Structural Model for Stock Return Volatility and Trading Volume.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1), 94-110, (1996).Google Scholar
  13. Brooks, C., “Linear and Non-Linear Forecastability of High-Frequency Exchange Rates.” Journal of Forecasting 16(2), 125-145, (1997).Google Scholar
  14. Caporale, G. M., C. Hassapis and N. Pittis, “Conditional Leptokurtosis and Non-linear Dependence in Exchange Rate Returns.” Journal of Policy Modeling 20(5), 581-601, (1998).Google Scholar
  15. Deb, P., “Finite Sample Properties of Maximum Likelihood and Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimators of EGARCH Models.” Econometric Reviews 15, 51-68, (1996).Google Scholar
  16. Diebold, F. X., Empirical Modelling the Exchange Rate Dynamics, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Diebold, F. X., T. A. Gunther and A. S. Tay, “Evaluating Density Forecasts with Applications to Financial Risk Management.” International Economic Review 39, 863-883, (1998).Google Scholar
  18. Drost, F. and T. E. Nijman, “Temporal Aggregation of GARCH Process.” Econometrica 61(4), 909-927, (1993).Google Scholar
  19. Engle, R. F., “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with the Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation.” Econometrica 50, 987-1008, (1982).Google Scholar
  20. Engle, R. F. and T. Bollerslev, “Modeling the Persistence of Conditional Variance.” Econometrics Review 5, 1-50, (1986).Google Scholar
  21. Geweke, J., “Comment.” Econometrics Review 5, 57-61, (1986).Google Scholar
  22. Glosten, L. R., R. Jagannathan and D. Runkle, “On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stock.” Journal of Finance 48, 1779-1781, (1993).Google Scholar
  23. Granger,C. and M. H. Pesaran, “A Decision Theoretic Approach to Forecasting Evaluation,” in W. S., Chan, W. K. Li and Howell Tong (Eds), Statistics and Finance: An Interface, Imperial College Press: London, 261-278, (2000).Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, B. E., “Autoregressive Conditional Density Estimation.” International Economic Review 35, 705-730, (1994).Google Scholar
  25. Higgins, M. L. and A. K. Bera, “A Class of Nonlinear ARCH Models.” International Economic Review 33, 137-158, (1992).Google Scholar
  26. Hsieh, D. A., “Statistical Properties of Daily Exchange Rate: 1974-1983.” Journal of International Economics 24, 129-145, (1988).Google Scholar
  27. Hsieh, D. A., “Modeling Heteroskedasticity in Daily Foreign-Exchange Rates.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 307-317, (1989).Google Scholar
  28. Lee, S. and B. E. Hansen, “Asymptotic Theory for the GARCH(1, 1) Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimator.” Econometric Theory 10, 29-52, (1994).Google Scholar
  29. MacCurdy, T. H. and L. Morgan, “Tests of the Martingale Hypothesis for Foreign Currency Futures with Time Varying Volatility.” International Journal of Forecasting 3, 131-148, (1987).Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, J., “Two-Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization.” American Economic Review 77, 421-430, (1987).Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, J. and R. H. Rasche, “Sufficient Conditions for Expected Utility To Imply Mean-Standard Deviation Rankings: Empirical Evidence Concerning the Location and Scale Condition.” Economic Journal 102, 91-106, (1992).Google Scholar
  32. McKenzie, M. D., “ARCH Modeling of Australian Bilateral Exchange Rate Data.” Applied Financial Economics 7, 147-164, (1997).Google Scholar
  33. Milhø j, A., “A Conditional Variance Model for Daily Deviations of an Exchange Rate.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5, 99-103, (1987).Google Scholar
  34. Mittnik, S. and M. S. Paolella, “Conditional Density and Value-at-Risk Prediction of Asian Currency Exchange Rates.” Journal of Forecasting 19(4), 313-333, (2000).Google Scholar
  35. Nelson, D. B., “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach.” Econometrics 2, 347-370, (1991).Google Scholar
  36. Pagan, A. R. and H. Sabau On the Inconsistence of the MLE in Certain Heteroskedasticity Regression Model.” Mimeo: University of Rochester, 1987.Google Scholar
  37. Pantula, S. G., “Comment.” Econometrics Review 5, 71-73, 1986.Google Scholar
  38. Wang, K. L. and C. Fawson, “Modeling Asian Stock Returns with a More General Parametric GARCH Specification.” Journal of Financial Studies 9(3), 21-52, 2001.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, K. L., C. Fawson, C. B. Barrett and J. McDonald, “A Flexible Parametric GARCH Model with an Application to Exchange Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 16(4), 521-536, (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai-Li Wang
    • 1
  • Chris Fawson
    • 2
  • Christopher B. Barrett
    • 3
  1. 1.Tunghai UniversityTaiwan
  2. 2.Utah State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations