Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 201–211 | Cite as

Quantum Mechanics and Molecular Design in the Twenty First Century

  • Mark Eberhart


It is argued that the conventional descriptions of chemical bonds as covalent, ionic, metallic, and Van der Waals are compromising the usefulness of quantum mechanics in the synthesis and design of new molecules and materials. Parallels are drawn between the state of chemistry now and when the idea that phlogiston was an element impeded the development of chemistry. Overcoming the current obstacles will require new methods to describe molecular structure and bonding, just as new concepts were needed before the phlogiston theory could be set aside.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. R.F.W. Bader. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. H. Bilz. Z. Phys. 153: 338, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. H. Butterfield. The Origins of Modern Science: 1300–1800.G. Bell & Sons, Ltd., 1957.Google Scholar
  4. M. Cohen. Mat. Sci. Eng. 25: 3, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Costa and R.R. Conte. In J.T. Waber, P. Chiotli and W.N. Miner (Eds.), Compounds of Interest in Nuclear Reactor Technology. Inst. Metals Div., Sapec. Rep No. 13, Ann Arbor, MI, 1967Google Scholar
  6. E. Dempsey. Philos. Mag. 8: 285, 1963.Google Scholar
  7. P.A.M. Dirac. Proc. R. Soc., London A123: 714, 1929.Google Scholar
  8. V. Ern and A.C. Switendick. Phys. Rev. A 137: 1927, 1968.Google Scholar
  9. T. Hong and A.J. Freeman. Phys. Rev. B 43: 6446, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. C.S. Smith. A Search for Structure, Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. M.H. Yoo and C.L. Fu. Scripta Metall. 25: 2345, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Eberhart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and GeochemistryColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations