Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 347–365

Improving Biology Performance with Workshop Groups

  • Wendi K. Born
  • William Revelle
  • Lawrence H. Pinto


This 2-year quasi-experiment evaluated the effect of peer-led workshop groups on performance of minority and majority undergraduate biology students. The workshop intervention used was modeled after a program pioneered by Treisman (1992). Majority volunteers randomly assigned to workshops (n = 61) performed significantly better than those assigned to the control group (n = 60, p < 0.05) without spending more time studying. Workshop minority students (n = 25) showed a pattern of increasing exam performance in comparison to historic control minority students (n = 21), who showed a decreasing pattern (p < 0.05). Volunteers (n = 121) initially reported that biology was more interesting and more important to their futures than to nonvolunteers' (n = 435, p < 0.05). Volunteers also reported higher levels of anxiety related to class performance (p < 0.05). The relationship of anxiety to performance was moderated by volunteer status. Performance of volunteers was negatively associated with self-reported anxiety (r = −0.41, p < 0.01). Performance of nonvolunteers was unrelated to self-reported anxiety (r = −0.02). Results suggest elevated anxiety related to class performance may increase willingness to participate in activities such as workshop interventions. In addition, students who volunteer for interventions such as workshops may be at increased risk of performance decrements associated with anxiety. Even so, workshop programs appear to be an effective way to promote excellence among both majority and minority students who volunteer to participate, despite the increased risk of underperformance associated with higher levels of anxiety.

group learning biology performance minority groups academic achievement stereotyped–attitudes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., and Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87: 49-74.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W., and Birch, D. (1970). The Dynamics of Action, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. W., and Birch, D. (1974).The dynamics of achievement-oriented activity. In Atkinson, J. W., and Raynor, J. O. (Eds.), Motivation and Achievement, Silver Springs, MD, V. H. Winston, pp. 271-236.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, J. W., and Birch, D. (1986). Fundamentals of the dynamics of action. In Kuhl, J., and Atkinson, J. W. (Eds.), Motivation, Thought, and Action, Praeger, New York, pp. 16-48.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, M., McKeachie, W. J., and Lin, Y. (1987). Two types of test-anxious students: Support for an information processing model. Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 131-136.Google Scholar
  6. Bonsangue, M. V., and Drew, D. E. (1995). Increasing minority students' success in calculus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Fostering Student Success in Quantitative Gateway Courses 61: 23-33.Google Scholar
  7. Born, W. K. (2000). The Effect of Workshop Groups on Achievement Goals and Performance in Biology: An Outcome Evaluation, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, W. (1997). BioExcel at the University of Kentucky. Unpublished Project Description.Google Scholar
  9. Covington, M. V., and Omelich, C. L. (1991). Need achievement revisited: Verification of Atkinson's original 2 x 2 model. In Spielberger, C. D., Sarason, I. G., Kulcsar, Z., and VanHeck, G. L. (Eds.), Stress and Emotion: Anxiety, Anger, and Curiosity, Hemisphere, New York, Vol. 14, pp. 85-105.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle, R. (2002). Filling the Pipeline: Are there enough Ph.D.s in science and engineering. Scientific American 286: 25.Google Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41: 1040-1048.Google Scholar
  12. Dweck, C. S., and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 95: 256-273.Google Scholar
  13. Elliot, A. J., and Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 218-232.Google Scholar
  14. Elliot, A. J., and McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 628-644. Freeman, M. (1995). MathExcel: A Special Opportunity in Calculus. Unpublished Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, M. (1997). Collaborative math and science workshops in Kentucky and Appalachia. Mathematics and Education Reform Forum 9: 1, 5, 8.Google Scholar
  16. Fullilove, M., Fullilove, R. E., Terris, M., and Lacayo, N. (1988). Is “Black achievement” an oxymoron? Thought and Action 4: 5-20.Google Scholar
  17. Fullilove, R. E., and Treisman, P. U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the mathematics workshop program. Journal of Negro Education 59: 463-478.Google Scholar
  18. Gosser, D., Roth,V., Gafney, L., Kampmeier, J., Strozak,V., Varma-Nelson, P., Radel, S., and Weiner, M. (1996).Workshop chemistry: Overcoming the barriers to student success. The Chemical Educator 1: 2-3.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, J. A. (1987) Psychology of Fear and Stress, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost Talent: Women in the Sciences, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, S. T. (1996). Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients, 1987-94 (Detailed Statistical Tables, pp. 96-329), National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Humphreys, M. S., and Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review 91: 153-184.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity, School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., and Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 89: 47-62.Google Scholar
  25. Kuhl, J., and Blankenship, V. (1979).The dynamic theory of achievement motivation: From episodic to dynamic thinking. Psychological Review 86: 141-151.Google Scholar
  26. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., and Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In McHunt, J. (Ed.), Personality and the Behavior Disorders, Ronald Press, New York, Vol. 1, pp. 333-378.Google Scholar
  27. Mandler, G., and Sarason, S. B. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47: 166-173.Google Scholar
  28. Mathews, A. M., and MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion 16: 331-354.Google Scholar
  29. McCaffrey, J., and Myers, M. (1994). The Emerging Scholars Program, Unpublished program description, The University of Texas.Google Scholar
  30. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., and Lowell, E. L. (1953). The Achievement Motive, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, L. S. (1995). An American Imperative: Accelerating Minority Educational Advancement, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  32. National Science Board (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. National Science Board Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education (1987). Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education (Source Materials NSB), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, Vol. II, pp. 86-100.Google Scholar
  34. Pintrich, P. R., and de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 33-40.Google Scholar
  35. Raynor, J. O. (1969). Future orientation and motivation of immediate activity: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation. Psychological Review 76: 606-610.Google Scholar
  36. Raynor, J. O. (1970). Relationships between achievement related motives, future orientation, and academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15: 28-33.Google Scholar
  37. Revelle, W. (1986). Motivation and efficiency of cognitive performance. In Brown D. R., and Veroff, J. (Eds.), Frontiers of Motivational Psychology: Essays in Honor of John W. Atkinson, Springer, Berlin, pp. 107-131.Google Scholar
  38. Revelle, W., and Michaels, E. J. (1976). The theory of achievement motivation revisited: The implications of inertial tendencies. Psychological Review 83: 394-404.Google Scholar
  39. Sarason, I. G. (1961). The effects of anxiety and threat on solution of a difficult task. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62: 165-168.Google Scholar
  40. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  41. Selvin, P. (1992). Math education: Multiplying the meager numbers. Science 258: 1200-1201.Google Scholar
  42. Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin 94: 429-445.Google Scholar
  43. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2nd ed., Allyn &;; Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.Google Scholar
  44. Steele, C. M. (1992). Race and the schooling of Black Americans. The Atlantic Monthly 269: 68-78.Google Scholar
  45. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52: 613-629.Google Scholar
  46. Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 797-811.Google Scholar
  47. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal 23: 362-372.Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1988). Educating Scientists and Engineers: Grade School to Grad School (OTASET-377), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  49. Vetter, B. M. (1990). Who is in the Pipeline? Science, Math and Engineering Education (Occasional Paper 90-2), Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  50. Watson, D., and Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin 96: 465-490.Google Scholar
  51. Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin 76: 92-104.Google Scholar
  52. Wortman, C. B., and Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 8, pp. 277-336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendi K. Born
    • 1
  • William Revelle
    • 1
  • Lawrence H. Pinto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and PhysiologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations