European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 108, Issue 7, pp 685–690 | Cite as

Relationship Between Growth and Mycotoxin Production by Fusarium species, Biocides and Environment

  • N. Magan
  • R. Hope
  • A. Colleate
  • E.S. Baxter


Fusarium head blight of cereals has, in recent years, become one of the most important pre-harvest diseases worldwide. This paper examines the in vitro efficacy of fungicides to control Fusarium species in cereals and the efficacy in the field on both Fusarium infection of ripening ears as well as their impact on mycotoxin production. Field studies suggest that fungicides such as tebuconazole and metconazole give good control of both Fusarium infection of ears and control of deoxynivalenol (DON) production. However, azoxystrobin and related fungicides are less effective, and grain from treated crops has sometimes been found to have increased concentrations of DON and nivalenol. Studies of isolates of Fusarium culmorum from different parts of Europe showed that complex interactions occur between environmental factors, fungicide type and isolate in relation to growth inhibition and DON production. These studies confirmed the ineffectiveness of azoxystrobin and suggest that environmental stress factors, particularly water availability and temperature, and low fungicide doses may stimulate mycotoxin production by Fusaria in vitro and in wheat grain.

Fusarium species water availability fungicides mycotoxins 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Badii F and Moss MO (1988) The effect of the fungicides tridemorph, fenpropimorph and fenarimol on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus parasiticus Speare. Letters in Applied Microbiology 7: 37–39Google Scholar
  2. D'Mello JPF, Macdonald AMC, Postel D, Dijiksman WTP, Dujardin A and Placinta C (1998) Pesticide use and mycotoxin production in Fusarium and Aspergillus phytopathogens. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104: 741–751Google Scholar
  3. Draughton FA and Churchville DC (1985) Effect of pesticides on zearalenone production in culture and in corn plants. Phytopathology 75: 553–556Google Scholar
  4. Edwards SG, Pirgozliev SR, Hare MC and Jenkinson P (2001) Quantification of trichothcene-producing Fusarium species in harvested grain by competitive PCR to determine efficacies of fungicides against Fusarium head blight of winter wheat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67: 1575–1580Google Scholar
  5. Ellner FM (2000) Mycotoxins-quantification, control and regulation in agricultural produce. The 2000 BCPC Proceedings 75: 45–53Google Scholar
  6. Fernando T and Bean G (1986) Effects of tricyclazole on growth, release of aflatoxin, and sterol and fatty acid content by Aspergillus isolates. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 87: 445–449Google Scholar
  7. Hasan HAH (1993) Fungicide inhibition of aflatoxins, diacetoxyscerpinol and zearalenone production. Folia Micobiology 38: 295–298Google Scholar
  8. Jennings P and Turner JA (1996) Towards the prediction of Fusarium ear blight epidemics in the UK-the role of humidity in disease development. The 1996 BCPC Crop Protection Conference - Pests and Diseases 1: 233–238Google Scholar
  9. Jennings P, Turner JA and Nicholson P (2000) Overview of Fusarium ear blight in the UK - effect of fungicide treatment on disease control and mycotoxin production. The BCPC Crop Protection Conference - Pests and Diseases 6C-2: 707–712Google Scholar
  10. Kang Z, Huang L and Buchenauer H (2001a) Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of effects of the fungicide metconazole on Fuarium culmorum in vitro. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 108: 419–432Google Scholar
  11. Kang Z, Huang L, Krieg U, Mauler-Machnik A and Buchenauer H (2001b) Effects of tebuconazole on morphology, structure, cell wall components and trichothecene production of Fusarium culmorum in vitro. Pest Management Science 57: 491–500Google Scholar
  12. Lacey J, Bateman GL and Mirocha C (1999) Effects of infection time and moisture on development of ear blight and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium spp. in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 134: 277–283Google Scholar
  13. Lee HB and Magan N (2000) Impact of environment and interspecific interactions between spoilage fungi and Aspergillus ochraceus and ochratoxin production on maize. International Journal of Food Microbiology 61: 11–16Google Scholar
  14. Magan N and Lacey J (1984a) The effect of temperature and pH on the water relations of field and storage fungi. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 82: 71–81Google Scholar
  15. Magan N and Lacey J (1984b) Water relations of some Fusarium species from infected wheat ears and grain. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 83: 281–285Google Scholar
  16. Magan N and Lacey J (1986) The phylloplane microbial populations of wheat and effect of late fungicide applications. Annals of Applied Biology 109: 117–128Google Scholar
  17. Marin S, Sanchis V and Magan N (1995) Water activity, temperature and pH effects on growth of Fusarium moniliforme and F. proliferatum isolates from maize. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41: 1097–1105Google Scholar
  18. Marin S, Magan N, Abellana M, Canela R, Ramos AJ and Sanchis V (1999) Selective effect of propionates on maize mycoflora and impact on fumonisin B1 accumulation. Journal of Stored Product Research 36: 203–214Google Scholar
  19. Marin S, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ and Magan N (1998) Control of growth and fumonisin B1 production by F. moniliforme and F. proliferatum isolates in maize grain with propionate formulations. Food Additives and Contaminants 16: 555–563Google Scholar
  20. Mathies A and Buchenauer H (1996) Investigations on the action of different active ingredients on the biosynthesis of mycotoxins in Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum. In: Lyr H, Russell PE and Sisler HD (eds) Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds (pp 199–204) Intercept Ltd., AndoverGoogle Scholar
  21. Milus EA and Parsons CE (1994) Evaluation of foliar fungicides for controlling Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Disease 78: 697–699Google Scholar
  22. Moss MO (1985) Influence of agricultural biocides on mycotoxin formation in cereals. In: Chelkowski J (ed) Cereal Grain - Mycotoxins, fungi and quality in storage, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Moss MO and Frank M (1985) The influence of the fungicide tridemorph on T-2 toxin production by Fusarium sporotrichioides. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 84: 585–590Google Scholar
  24. Parry DW, Jenkinson P and McLeod L (1995) Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals: A review. Plant Pathology 44: 207–238Google Scholar
  25. Savard ME, Sinha RC, Seaman WL and Fedak G (2000) Sequential distribution of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in wheat spikes after inoculation with Fusarium graminearum. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 22: 280–285Google Scholar
  26. Simpson DR, Weston GE, Turner JA, Jennings P and Nicholson P (2001) Differential control of head blight pathogens of wheat by fungicides and consequences for mycotoxin contamination of grain. European Journal of Plant Pathology 107: 421–431Google Scholar
  27. Siranidou E and Buchenauer H (2001) Chemical control of Fusarium head blight on wheat. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 108: 231–243Google Scholar
  28. Snjiders CHA and Perowski J (1990) Effects of head blight caused by Fusarium culmorum on toxin content and weight of wheat kernels. Phytopathology 80: 566–570Google Scholar
  29. Sturz AV and Johnston HW (1983) Early colonization of ears of wheat and barley by Fusarium poae. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 5: 107–110Google Scholar
  30. Sutton JC (1982) Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize caused by F. graminearum. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 4: 195–209Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Magan
    • 1
  • R. Hope
    • 1
  • A. Colleate
    • 1
  • E.S. Baxter
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Mycology Group, Cranfield Biotechnology CentreCranfield UniversitySilsoe, BedfordUK

Personalised recommendations