Advertisement

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 81, Issue 1–4, pp 357–364 | Cite as

The consequences of volatile organic compound mediated bacterial and fungal interactions

  • R.E. Wheatley
Article

Abstract

Microbial interactions via infochemicals are fundamental to the development of spatial distribution and activity variations in ecosystems. Microorganisms produce a wide range of infochemicals, frequently secondary metabolites, most of which are soluble and many volatile. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been identified in soil atmospheres and related to community structure and function. VOC profiles produced by microorganisms are consistent, relating to cultural conditions, environment and inputs, and so to population and function dynamics. VOC-mediated interactions can result in functional responses by the organisms involved that result in selective advantage to some community members. Positive, negative or neutral interactions can occur between a very wide range of soil bacteria and fungi. These effects include both stimulation and inhibition of growth, by 40 and 60%, respectively, and enzyme production. These effects are usually transient, e.g. removal of an antagonist is followed by complete recovery. Up- and down-regulation of gene expression, by mRNA and protein profiling has been demonstrated. VOCs have played an important role during the evolution of microorganisms in the context of their communities.

bacteria environment fungi microbial interactions volatile organic compounds 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alstrom S (2001) Characteristics of bacteria from oilseed rape in relation to their biocontrol of activity against Verticillium dahliae. Journal of Phytopathology, 149: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azcon-Aguiler C & Barea J-M (1985) Effect of soil microorganisms on formation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 84: 536–537.Google Scholar
  3. Azcon-Aguiler C, Diaz-Rodriguez RM & Barea J-M (1986) Effect of soil micro-organisms on spore germination and growth of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mossae. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 86: 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce A, Wheatley RE, Humphris SN, Hackett CA & Florence M (2000) Production of volatile organic compounds by Trichoderma spp. in media containing different amino acids and their effect on selected wood decay fungi. Hölzforschüng 54: 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiddaman DJ & Rossall S (1993) The production of antifungal volatiles by Bacillus subtilis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74: 119–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiddaman DJ & Rossall S (1994) Effect of substrate on the production of antifungal volatiles from Bacillus subtilis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76: 396–405.Google Scholar
  7. Fitter AH & Garbaye J (1994) Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and other soil organisms. Plant and Soil 159: 123–132.Google Scholar
  8. Giudici P, Romano P & Zambonelli C (1990) A biometric study of higher alcohol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can. J. Microbiol. 36: 61–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Humphris S, Wheatley RE, Bruce A & Payne C (1999) Assessment of the inhibition of wood decay fungi by volatiles produced by Trichoderma spp. Proceedings 30th Annual Meeting of the International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Rosenheim, Germany IRG/WP 99-10302.Google Scholar
  10. Humphris SN, Bruce A & Wheatley RE (2000) Volatile inhibition of Serpula lacrymans by Trichoderma spp. Proceedings 31st Annual Meeting of the International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Humphris N, Wheatley RE & Bruce A (2001) The effects of specific volatile organic compounds produced by Trichoderma spp. on the growth of wood decay fungi. Hölzforschüng 55: 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Humphris SN, Bruce A, Buultjens E & Wheatley RE (2002) The effects of volatile microbial secondary metabolites on protein synthesis in Serpula lacrymans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 210(2) 215–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackie A & Wheatley RE (1998) Effects and incidence of volatile organic compound interactions between soil bacterial and fungal isolates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stahl PD & Parkin TB (1999) Microbial production of volatile organic compounds in soil microcosms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tronsmo A & Dennis C (1978) Effect of temperature on antagonistic properties of Trichoderma species. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 71: 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stotzky G & Schenck S (1976) Volatile organic compounds and microorganisms CRC Crit. Rev. 4: 333–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wheatley RE, Millar SE & Griffiths DW (1996) The production of volatile organic compounds during nitrogen transformations in soils. Plant and Soil 181: 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wheatley RE, Hackett C, Bruce A & Kundzewicz A (1997) Effect of substrate composition on production and inhibitory activity against wood decay fungi of volatile organic compounds from Trichoderma spp. Int. Biodeterior. Degradation 39: 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zechman JM & Labows JN (1985) Volatiles of Pseudomonas aeuroginosa and related species by automated headspace concentration-gas chromatography. Can. J. Microbiol. 31: 232–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.E. Wheatley
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil-Plant Dynamics UnitScottish Crop Research InstituteDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations