Landscape Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 355–365

Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis

  • Jianguo Wu
  • Richard Hobbs
Article

Abstract

Landscape ecology has made tremendous progress in recent decades, but as a rapidly developing discipline it is faced with new problems and challenges. To identify the key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology, a special session entitled “Top 10 List for Landscape Ecology in the 21st Century” was organized at the 16th Annual Symposium of the US Regional Association of International Association of Landscape Ecology, held at Arizona State University (Tempe, Arizona, USA) during April 25–29, 2001. A group of leading landscape ecologists were invited to present their views. This paper is intended to be a synthesis, but not necessarily a consensus, of the special session. We have organized the diverse and wide-ranging perspectives into six general key issues and 10 priority research topics. The key issues are: (1) interdisciplinarity or transdisciplinarity, (2) integration between basic research and applications,(3) Conceptual and theoretical development, (4) education and training, (5)international scholarly communication and collaborations, and (6) outreach and communication with the public and decision makers. The top 10 research topics are: (1) ecological flows in landscape mosaics, (2) causes, processes, and consequences of land use and land cover change, (3) nonlinear dynamics and landscape complexity, (4) scaling, (5) methodological development, (6) relating landscape metrics to ecological processes, (7) integrating humans and their activities into landscape ecology, (8) optimization of landscape pattern, (9)landscape sustainability, and (10) data acquisition and accuracy assessment. We emphasize that, although this synthesis was based on the presentations at the“Top 10 List” session, it is not a document that has been agreed upon by each and every participant. Rather, we believe that it is reflective of the broad-scale vision of the collective as to where landscape ecology is now and where it may be going in future.

Key issues Landscape ecology Research priorities and challenges 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson J. and Le Floc'h E. 1996. Vital landscpae attributes: Missing tools for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol. 4: 377-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett G.W. and Peles J.D. 1999. Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Bissonette J.A. 1997. Wildlife and Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Dale V.H. and Haeuber R.A. 2001. Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Farina A. 1998. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Farina A. 2000. Landscape Ecology in Action. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Forman R.T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Golley F.B. and Bellot J. 1991. Interactions of landscape ecology, planning and design. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 21: 3-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haines-Young R., Green D.R. and Cousins S.H. 1993. Landscape Ecology and GIS. Taylor & Francis, London, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Hansson L., Fahrig L. and Merriam G. 1995. Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Hargrove W.W. and Pickering J. 1992. Pseudoreplication: A sine qua non for regional ecology. Landsc. Ecol. 6: 251-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klopatek J.M. and Gardner R.H. 1999. Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn T.S. 1983. Roundtable: Kuhn and Lederberg on Scientific Thought. New York Times, New York, New York, USA, March 13, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Levin S.A. 1999. Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons. Perseus Books, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Ludwig J., Tongway D., Freudenberger D., Noble J. and Hodgkinson K. 1997. Landscape Ecology, Function and Management. CSIRO, Collingwood, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Mladenoff D.J. and Baker W.L. 1999. Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Moss M.R. 1999. Fostering academic and institutional activities in landscape ecology. In: Wiens J.A. and Moss M.R. (eds), Issues in Landscape Ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Snowmass Village, Colorado, USA, pp. 138-144.Google Scholar
  20. Nassauer J.I. 1997. Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Naveh Z. 1988. Biocybernetic Perspectives of Landscape Ecology and Management. In: Moss M.R. (ed.), Landscape Ecology and Management. Polyscience, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp. 23-34.Google Scholar
  22. Naveh Z. and Lieberman A.S. 1994. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Naveh Z. 2000. What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 50: 7-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oksanen L. 2001. Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudo issue? Oikos 94: 27-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Neill R.V. 1999. Theory in landscape ecology. In: Wiens J.A. and Moss M.R. (eds), In Issues in Landscape Ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Snowmass Village, Colorado, USA, pp. 1-5.Google Scholar
  26. Pickett S.T.A., Kolasa J. and Jones C.G. 1994. Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Putnam S.H. 1986. Future directions for urban systems models: some pointers from empirical investigations. In: Hutchinson B. and Batty M. (eds), Advances in Urban Systems Modeling., New York, North Holland,, pp. 91-108.Google Scholar
  28. Risser P.G., Karr J.R. and Forman R.T.T. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publ. 2, Champaign, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Sanderson J. and Harris L.D. 2000. Landscape Ecology: A Top-Down Approach. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Troll C. 1939. Luftbildplan and okologische bodenforschung. Zeitschraft der Gesellschaft fur Erdkunde Zu, Berlin, 241-298.Google Scholar
  31. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. and O'Neill R.V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Watt A.S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35: 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiens J.A. 1999. Toward a unified landscape ecology. In: Wiens J.A. and Moss M.R. (eds), Issues in Landscape Ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Snowmass Village, Colorado, USA, pp. 148-151.Google Scholar
  34. Wiens J.A. and Moss M.R. 1999. Issues in Landscape Ecology in. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Snowmass Village, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Wu J. 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 25: 367-380.Google Scholar
  36. Wu J. 2000. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  37. Zonneveld I.S. 1995. Land Ecology. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianguo Wu
    • 1
  • Richard Hobbs
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Murdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations