Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 81, Issue 1–4, pp 599–606 | Cite as

Exploitation of genetically modified inoculants for industrial ecology applications

  • John P. Morrissey
  • Ultan F. Walsh
  • Anne O'Donnell
  • Yvan Moënne-Loccoz
  • Fergal O'Gara
Article

Abstract

The major growth seen in the biotechnology industry in recent decades has largely been driven by the exploitation of genetic engineering techniques. The initial benefits have been predominantly in the biomedical area, with products such as vaccines and hormones that have received broad public approval. In the environmental biotechnology and industrial ecology sectors, biotechnology has the potential to make significant advances through the use of genetically modified (GM) microbial inoculants that can reduce agri-chemical usage or remediate polluted environments. Although many GM inoculants have been developed and tested under laboratory conditions, commercial exploitation has lagged behind. Here, we review scientific and regulatory requirements that must be satisfied as part of that exploitation process. Particular attention is paid to new European Union (EU) regulations (Directives) that govern the testing and release of genetically modified organisms and microbial plant protection inoculants in the EU. With regard to the release of GM inoculants, the impact of the inoculant and the fate of modified genes are important concerns. Long term monitoring of release sites is necessary to address these issues. Data are reported from the monitoring of a site 6 years after release of GM Sinorhizobium meliloti strains. It was found that despite the absence of a host plant, the GM strains persisted in the soil for at least 6 years. Horizontal transfer and microevolution of a GM plasmid between S. meliloti strains was also observed. These data illustrate the importance of assessing the long-term persistence of GM inoculants.

EU directive GM inoculant GMO regulatory requirements plant protection product 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarons S, Abbas A, Adams C, Fenton A & O'Gara F (2000) A regulatory RNA (PrrB RNA) modulates expression of secondary metabolite genes in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113. J. Bacteriol. 182: 3913–3919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloemberg GV & Lugtenberg BJ (2001) Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 4: 343–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Lipthay JR, Barkay T & Sorensen SJ (2001) Enhanced degradation of phenoxyacetic acid in soil by horizontal transfer of the tfdA gene encoding a 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid dioxygenase. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 35: 75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. de Leij FAAM, Sutton EJ, Whipps JM, Fenlon JS & Lynch JM (1995) Impact of field release of genetically modified Pseudomonas fluorescens on indigenous microbial populations of wheat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 3443–3453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Lorenzo V (2001) The potential for genetically modified bacteria to break down toxic pollutants in the environment. EMBO Reports 2: 357–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Delany I, Sheehan MM, Fenton A, Bardin S, Aarons S & O'Gara F (2000) Regulation of production of the antifungal metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113: genetic analysis of phlF as a transcriptional repressor. Microbiology 146: 537–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DiGiovanni GD, Neilson JW, Pepper IL & Sinclair NA (1996) Gene transfer of Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134 plasmid pJP4 to indigenous soil recipients. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 2521–2526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Droge M, Pühler A & Selbitschka W (1998) Horizontal gene transfer as a biosafety issue: a natural phenomenon of public concern. J. Biotechnol. 64: 75–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadd GM (2000) Bioremedial potential of microbial mechanisms of metal mobilization and immobilization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11: 271–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geniaux E & Amarger N (1993) Diversity and stability of plasmid transfer in isolates from a single field population of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 102: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert GS, Parke JL, Clayton MK & Handelsman J (1993) Effects of an introduced bacterium on bacterial communities on roots. Ecology 74: 840–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glandorf DC, Verheggen P, Jansen T, Jorritsma JW, Smit E, Leeflang P, Wernars K, Thomashow LS, Laureijs E, Thomas-Oates JE, Bakker PA & van Loon LC (2001) Effect of genetically modified Pseudomonas putida WCS358r on the fungal rhizosphere microflora of field-grown wheat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3371–3378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haas D, Blumer C & Keel C (2000) Biocontrol ability of fluorescent pseudomonads genetically dissected: importance of positive feedback regulation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11: 290–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrick JB, Stuart-Keil KG, Ghiorse WC & Madsen EL (1997) Natural horizontal transfer of a naphthalene dioxygenase gene between bacteria native to a coal tar-contaminated field site. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 2330–2337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirsch PR (1996) Population dynamics of indigenous and genetically modified rhizobia in the field. New Phytol. 133: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lottmann J, Heuer H, de Vries J, Mahn A, Düring K, Wackernagel W, Smalla K & Berg G (2000) Establishment of introduced antagonistic bacteria in the rhizosphere of transgenic potatoes and their effect on the bacterial community. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33: 41–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahaffee WF & Kloepper JW (1997) Bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and endorhiza associated with field-grown cucumber plants inoculated with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium or its genetically modified derivative. Can. J. Microbiol. 43: 344–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moënne-Loccoz Y, Tichy H-V, O'Donnell A, Simon R & O'Gara F (2001) Impact of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 on intraspecific diversity of resident culturable fluorescent pseudomonads associated with the root of field-grown sugarbeet seedlings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3418–3425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naseby DC, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Powell J, O'Gara F & Lynch JM (1998) Soil enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of field-grown sugar beet inoculated with the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens F113. Biol. Fertil. Soils 27: 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Natsch A, Keel C, Hebecker N, Laasik E & Défago G (1997) Influence of the biocontrol strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens and its antibiotic overproducing derivative on the diversity of resident root colonizing pseudomonads. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 23: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O'Flaherty S, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Boesten B, Higgins P, Dowling DN, Condon S & O'Gara F (1995) Greenhouse and field evaluations of an autoselective system based on an essential thymidylate synthase gene for improved maintenance of plasmid vectors in modified Rhizobium meliloti. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 4051–4056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pieper DH & Reineke W(2000) Engineering bacteria for bioremediation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11: 262–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poelarends GJ, Kulakov LA, Larkin MJ, van Hylckama Vlieg JE & Janssen DB (2000) Roles of horizontal gene transfer and gene integration in evolution of 1,3-dichloropropene-and 1,2-dibromoethane-degradative pathways. J. Bacteriol. 182: 2191–2199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ripp S, Nivens DE, Ahn Y, Werner C, Jarrell J, Easter JP, Cox CD, Burlage RS & Sayler GS (2000) Controlled field release of a genetically engineered microorganism for bioremediation process monitoring and control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34: 846–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robleto EA, Borneman J & Triplett EW (1998) Effects of bacterial antibiotic production on rhizosphere microbial communities from a culture-independent perspective. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 5020–5022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sayler GS & Ripp S (2000) Field applications of genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation processes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11: 286–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schofield PR, Gibson AH, Dudman WF & Watson JM (1987) Evidence for genetic exchange and recombination of Rhizobium symbiotic plasmids in a soil population. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53: 2942–2947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Steenhoudt O & Vanderleyden J (2000) Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24: 487–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Timmis KN & Pieper DH (1999) Bacteria designed for bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol. 17: 200–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Top EM, Van Daele P, De Saeyer N & Forney LJ (1998) Enhancement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) degradation in soil by dissemination of catabolic plasmids. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73: 87–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Overbeek LS, van Veen JA & van Elsas JD (1997) Induced reporter activity, enhanced stress resistance, and competitive ability of a genetically modified Pseudomonas fluorescens strain released into a field planted with wheat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 1965–1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. van Veen JA, van Overbeek LS & van Elsas JD (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61: 121–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol. 127: 390–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walsh UF, Morrissey JP & O'Gara F (2001) Pseudomonas for biocontrol of phytopathogens: from functional genomics to commercial exploitation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12: 289–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ye X, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P & Potrykus I (2000) Engineering the provitamin A (beta-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science 287: 303–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Morrissey
    • 1
  • Ultan F. Walsh
    • 1
  • Anne O'Donnell
    • 1
  • Yvan Moënne-Loccoz
    • 2
  • Fergal O'Gara
    • 1
  1. 1.BIOMERIT Research Centre, Microbiology DepartmentUniversity CollegeCorkIreland
  2. 2.UMR CNRS d'Ecologie Microbienne, UniversitéVilleurbanne (cedex)France

Personalised recommendations