Scientometrics

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 445–462 | Cite as

A citation report for Thai academic journals published during 1996-2000

  • N. Sombatsompop
  • P. Ratchatahirun
  • V. Surathanasakul
  • N. Premkamolnetr
  • T. Markpin

Abstract

This article aimed to report Journal Impact Factor (J-IF) and Journal Immediacy Index (J-II) of 68 Thai academic journals during the past five years (from 1996 to 2000) using the calculation method given by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). This was the first time that the citation indexes of Thai academic journals were established. With respect to the journal impact factor, the results showed that only six journals have been cited continuously during the past five years, this being 8.8% of the total journal number selected in this work. It was also noticeable that articles published in longer journal age tended to have greater opportunity to be cited and higher journal impact factor. The average impact factor of the 68 journals was relatively low, this being of 0.069, suggesting that the possibility of an article published in a national journal to be cited was only 6.9%. In terms of the immediacy index, it was found that the average immediacy index value was 0.063, which was again very low. No significant relationship between the journal age and the immediacy index could be observed. 47% of the journals have never been able to produce the immediacy index in the past five years, suggesting that articles in the Thai academic journals were hardly cited within the same years they were published.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Institute for Scientific Information: ISI, (1999) Philadelphia (USA) in http://www.isinet.comGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stegmann, J., Building a list of journals with constructed impact factors, Journal of Documentation, 55 (1999) 310–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Green, A., Deep impact, Advanced Materials, 12 (2000) 1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amin, M., Mabe, M., Impact Factors: Use and abuse, Perspectives in Publishing, (1) (2000) 1–6.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, T. N., Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factor, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995) 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neuberger, J., Counsell, C., Impact factors: Uses and abuses, European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14 (2002) 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dumontier, C., Nizard, R., Sautet, A., Impact factors or do we have to choose between the impact factor and the Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique? Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur, 87 (2001) 115–128.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suwannarat, C., Journal Citation Analysis of Foreign Language Research Articles Written by Members of the Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Master Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (1987) [In Thai]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thongsrisuksai, S., Citation Analysis of Research Papers of Lecturers in Khon Kaen University, KKU Academic Resources Center, Khon Kean Thailand (1996).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tankeyura, K., Citation Analysis of Master's Theses and Faculty's Research Reports, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. Master Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (1986) [In Thai]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gehanno, J. F., Thirion, B., How to select publications on occupational health: The usefulness of Medline and the impact factor, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57 (2000) 706–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, W., Environmental impact: A preliminary citation analysis of local faculty in a new academic program in environmental and health applied to collection development at Texas Tech University Library, Library & Information Science Research, 9 (1999) 1. Available at: http://www.libres.curtin.edu.au/libre9n1/toxcite.htmMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christie, A., Kristick, L., Developing an Online Science Journal Collection: A Quick Tool for Assigning Priorities, Oregon State University, 2001. Available at: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/01-spring/article2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westney, L. H., Historical rankings of science and technology: A citationist perspective, The Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 1 (1998). Available at: http://www.mcel.pacificu.edu/history/jahcI1/Westney/Westney.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lok, C. K., Chan, M.T., Martinson, I. M., Risk factors for citation errors in peer-reviewed nursing journals, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34 (2001) 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers/Akadémiai Kiadó 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Sombatsompop
    • 1
  • P. Ratchatahirun
    • 1
  • V. Surathanasakul
    • 1
  • N. Premkamolnetr
    • 2
  • T. Markpin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Energy & MaterialsKing Mongkut"s University of Technology Thonburi ThungkruBangmod, BangkokThailand
  2. 2.Central LibraryKing Mongkut"s University of Technology Thonburi ThungkruBangmod, Bangkok(Thailand)

Personalised recommendations