Sex Roles

, Volume 46, Issue 11–12, pp 429–437

You Look Mahvelous: An Examination of Gender and Appearance Comments in the 1999–2000 Prime-Time Season

  • Martha M. Lauzen
  • David M. Dozier

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the number and type of appearance comments made and received between female and male characters and whether the employment of women writers mitigated verbal interactions about appearance in the 1999–2000 prime-time season. The results show that although male and female characters comment equally on other characters' appearance, female characters are twice as likely to be the recipients of those comments. The gender of the receiver also influences the type of appearance comment made. Male characters are more likely to insult males than females and to compliment females than males. In contrast, female characters insult and compliment female and male characters with equal frequency. Overall, the employment of women writers is related to a significant increase in the overall number of appearance comments made and a significant decrease in the number of insults.

appearance beauty compliments content analysis insults occupational roles politeness television 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abramowitz, R. (2000). Is that a gun in your pocket? Women's experience of power in Hollywood. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Beuf, A. (1974). Doctor, lawyer, household drudge. Journal of Communication, 24, 142-145.Google Scholar
  3. Botta, R. A. (1999, May). The role of television image exposure, perceptions and processing in body image disturbance. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Cutrona, C. E., Suhr, J. A., & MacFarlane, R. (1990). Interpersonal transactions and the psychological sense of support. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 30-45). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, D. M. (1990). Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics. Sex Roles, 23, 325-332.Google Scholar
  6. Dervin, B. (1989). Audience as listener and learner, teacher and confidante: The sense-making approach. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (2nd ed., pp. 67-86). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Downs, A. C., & Harrison, S. K. (1985). Embarrassing age spots or just plain ugly? Physical attractiveness stereotyping as an instrument of sexism on American television commercials. Sex Roles, 13, 9-19.Google Scholar
  8. Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K. (1999). Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal reinforcements. Sex Roles, 40, 473-481.Google Scholar
  10. Gunter, B. (1986). Television and sex role stereotyping. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  11. Heide, M. J. (1995). Television culture and women's lives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, J. (1986). Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics, 28, 485-508.Google Scholar
  13. Kalb, C. (1999, August 9). Our quest to be perfect. Newsweek, pp. 52-59.Google Scholar
  14. Kimball, M. M. (1986). Television and sex-role attitudes. In T. M. Williams (Ed.), The impact of television: A natural experiment in three communities (pp. 265-298). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Knapp, M. L., Hopper, R., & Bell, R. A. (1984). Compliments: A descriptive taxonomy. Journal of Communication, 34, 12-31.Google Scholar
  16. Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1999). Making a difference in prime time: Women on screen and behind the scenes in the 1995–96 television season. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(1), 1-19.Google Scholar
  17. Leibovitz, A., & Sontag, S. (1999). Women. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Levy, M. R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1), 51-78.Google Scholar
  19. McArthur, L. Z., & Eisen, S. V. (1976). Television and sex-role stereotyping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 329-351.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, M. (1982). Television and adolescents' sex role stereo-types: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 947-955.Google Scholar
  21. Myers, p. N., & Biocca, F. A. (1992). The elastic body image: The effect of television advertising and programming on body image distortions in young women. Journal of Communication, 42(3), 108-133.Google Scholar
  22. Oldham, J. (1999, May 20). Companies debut 1st ads for saline breast implants. Los Angeles Times, pp. C1, C6.Google Scholar
  23. Pope, H. G., Phillips, K. A., & Olivardia, R. (2000). The Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, L., Anderson, D. R., & Wisocki, P. A. (1982). Television viewing and adult sex-role attitudes. Sex Roles, 8, 589-592.Google Scholar
  26. Seger, L. (1996). When women call the shots: The developing power and influence of women in television and film. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  27. Shields, V. R. (1999). Advertising to the gendered audience: Using sense-making to illuminate how audiences decode advertisements of idealized female bodies. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 9, 1-11.Google Scholar
  28. Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21, 341-360.Google Scholar
  29. Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527-544.Google Scholar
  30. Signorielli, N., & Lears, M. (1992). Children, television, and conceptions about chores: Attitudes and behaviors. Sex Roles, 27(3/4), 157-170.Google Scholar
  31. Signorielli, N., McLeod, D., & Healy, E. (1994). Gender stereotypes in MTV commercials: The beat goes on. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38, 91-101.Google Scholar
  32. Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B., & Kelly, E. (1986). The role of mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Sex Roles, 14, 519-532.Google Scholar
  33. Sims, A. L. (1989). The compliment sequence. Southern Communication Journal, 54, 171-184.Google Scholar
  34. Steenland, S. (1990). What's wrong with this picture? The status of women on screen and behind the camera in entertainment TV. Washington, DC: National Commission on Working Women of Wider Opportunities for Women.Google Scholar
  35. Talbot, M. M. (1998). Language and gender. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Turner, R. E., & Edgley, C. (1974). Reciprocity revisited: The case of compliments. Human Mosaic, 8, 1-13.Google Scholar
  37. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  38. Wolfson, M. (1983). An empirically-based analysis of complimenting in American English. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 82-95). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha M. Lauzen
    • 1
  • David M. Dozier
  1. 1.School of CommunicationSan Diego State UniversitySan Diego

Personalised recommendations