Reynolds Stress Budgets in Couette and Boundary Layer Flows
- 365 Downloads
Reynolds stress budgets for both Couette and boundary layer flows are evaluated and presented. Data are taken from direct numerical simulations of rotating and non-rotating plane turbulent Couette flow and turbulent boundary layer with and without adverse pressure gradient. Comparison of the total shear stress for the two types of flows suggests that the Couette case may be regarded as the high Reynolds number limit for the boundary layer flow close to the wall. The limit values of turbulence statistics close to the wall for the boundary layer for increasing Reynolds number approach the corresponding Couette flow values. The direction of rotation is chosen so that it has a stabilizing effect, whereas the adverse pressure gradient is destabilizing. The pressure-strain rate tensor in the Couette flow case is presented for a split into slow, rapid and Stokes terms. Most of the influence from rotation is located to the region close to the wall, and both the slow and rapid parts are affected. The anisotropy for the boundary layer decreases for higher Reynolds number, reflecting the larger separation of scales, and becomes close to that for Couette flow. The adverse pressure gradient has a strong weakening effect on the anisotropy. All of the data presented here are available on the web .
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Bech, K.H., Simulation of rotating and non-rotating turbulent plane Couette flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Applied Mechanics, Thermodynamics and Fluid dynamics, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim (1995).Google Scholar
- 7.Bech, K.H. and Andersson, H.I., Very-large-scale structures in DNS. In: Voke, P.R., Kleiser, L. and Chollet, J.-P. (eds.), Direct and Large-Eddy Simulations I. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994) pp. 13-24.Google Scholar
- 18.Komminaho, J., Lundbladh, A. and Johansson, A.V., Determination of the transition Reynolds number in plane Couette flow through study of relaminarization. In: Liu, C. and Liu, Z. (eds.), First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Ruston, LA. Greyden Press, Columbus (1997) pp. 233-240.Google Scholar
- 20.Le, H. and Moin, P., Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a back-ward facing step. In: Annual Research Briefs. Stanford University Center for Turbulence Research (1992) pp. 161-173.Google Scholar
- 26.Na, Y. and Moin, P., Direct numerical simulation of studies of turbulent boundary layers with adverse pressure gradient and separation. Technical Report TF-68, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University (1996).Google Scholar
- 27.Nagano, Y., Tagawa, M. and Tsuji, T., Effects of adverse pressure Gradients on mean flows and turbulence statistics in a boundary layer. In: Durst, F., Friedrich, R., Launder, B.E., Schmitd, F.W., Schumann, U. and Whitelaw, J.H. (eds.), Turbulent Shear Flows 8. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992) pp. 7-21.Google Scholar
- 34.Skote, M. and Henningson, D., Analysis of the data base from a DNS of a separating turbulent boundary layer. In: Annual Research Briefs. Center for Turbulence Research (1999) pp. 225-237.Google Scholar
- 35.Skote, M. and Henningson, D.S., DNS of a separated turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. (2002) accepted.Google Scholar
- 36.Skote, M. and Komminaho, J., http://nallo.mech.kth.se/~mskote/html_lib/data.html (2001).Google Scholar