International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 313–324 | Cite as

Effects of Fruit Patch Availability on Feeding Subgroup Size and Spacing Patterns in Four Primate Species at Tinigua National Park, Colombia

  • Pablo R. Stevenson
  • Marcela J. Quiñones
  • Jorge A. Ahumada


We examined the effects of fruit patch size, density, and distribution on feeding subgroup size and feeding bout duration in four Neotropical primates—Lagothrix lagotricha, Ateles belzebuth, Cebus apella, and Alouatta seniculus—based on 2494 hr of focal animal sampling in Tinigua National Park, Colombia. All four species show positive correlations between patch size (tree diameter at breast height; DBH) and subgroup size (maximum number of individuals from the focal group feeding at the same time), but the determination coefficients are very low and this relationship does not seem to influence strongly the actual size of the groups. Ateles showed the weakest correlation between patch size and feeding party size, and their fission–fusion sociality is best explained as a mechanism to reduce intragroup competition rather than to adjust the subgroup size to the availability of patches. Feeding associations as well as proximal spacing patterns, in general, are more alike in species with similar ecological requirements.

fruit patch availability feeding party size proximal spacing Lagothrix lagotricha Ateles belzebuth Cebus apella Alouatta seniculus Tinigua National Park, Colombia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chapman, C. (1990). Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates. Folia Primatol. 55: 1-9.Google Scholar
  2. Crook, J. H., and Gartlan, J. S. (1966). Evolution of primate societies. Nature 210: 1200-1203.Google Scholar
  3. Eisenberg, J. F., Muckenhirn, N. A., and Rudran, R. (1972). The relation between ecology and social structure in primates. Science 176: 863-874.Google Scholar
  4. Freeland, W. J. (1976). Pathogens and the evolution of primate sociality. Biotropica 8: 12-24.Google Scholar
  5. Janson, C. H. (1992). Evolutionary ecology of primate social structure. In Smith, E. A., and Winterhalder, B. (eds.), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, De Gruyter, New York, pp. 95-130.Google Scholar
  6. Klein, L. L., and Klein, D. J. (1977). Feeding behavior of the Columbian spider monkey. In Clutton-Brock, T. (ed.), Primate Ecology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 153-182.Google Scholar
  7. Leighton, M., and Leighton, D. R. (1982). The relationship of size of feeding aggregate to size of food patch: Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding in Trichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island. Biotropica 14(2): 81-90.Google Scholar
  8. Milton, K. (1984). Habitat, diet, and activity patterns of free-ranging woolly spider monkeys (Brachyteles arachnoides E. Geoffroy 1806). Int. J. Primatol. 5: 491-514.Google Scholar
  9. Sokal, P. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry, 3rd ed., W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Stevenson, P. R., Quiñones, M. J., and Ahumada, J. A. (1994). Ecological strategies of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Am. J. Primatol. 32: 123-140.Google Scholar
  11. Strier, K. (1989). Effects of patch size on feeding associations in Muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). Folia Primatol. 52: 70-77.Google Scholar
  12. Symington, M. M. (1988). Food competition and foraging subgroup size in the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek). Behaviour 105: 117-134.Google Scholar
  13. Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates: A Story in Comparative Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Terborgh, J., and Janson, C. H. (1986). The socioecology of primate groups. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 111-135.Google Scholar
  15. Wrangham, R. W. (1977). Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In Clutton-Brock, T. (ed.), Primate Ecology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 503-538.Google Scholar
  16. Wrangham, R. W. (1978). Evolution of social structure. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 282-296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo R. Stevenson
    • 1
  • Marcela J. Quiñones
    • 2
  • Jorge A. Ahumada
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologySUNY at Stony BrookStony Brook
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias BiológicasUniversidad de Los AndesSantafé de BogotáColombia
  3. 3.Departamento de BiologíaUniversidad JaverianaSantafé de BogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations