Advertisement

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 171–179 | Cite as

The origin of the salmonid fishes: marine, freshwater... or neither?

  • R.M. McDowall
Article

Abstract

The evolutionary origins of the salmonidfishes, whether in freshwater or the sea, havebeen debated for centuries. Early viewsfavoured a group of marine ancestry invadingfreshwaters; more recently, there was a shifttowards a freshwater ancestry, on grounds thata return to freshwater to spawn indicates theancestral biome. Salmonids are widely believedto share an ancient common ancestry with thenorthern hemisphere Osmeridae and southernhemisphere Retropinnidae and Galaxiidae. Salmonidae are diadromous, as are Osmeridae,Retropinnidae and Galaxiidae. This suggeststhat diadromy is an ancient behavioralphenomenon across all these groups, that theshared common ancestry of these groups was alsodiadromous, and that the ancestry of Salmonidaewas neither marine nor freshwater, but wasamongst diadromous fishes. This begs thequestion of whether this common ancestor wasmarine or freshwater, a question for which ananswer seems likely to be elusive.

diadromy freshwater marine origins Salmonidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balon, E.K. (1968) Notes to the origin and evolution of trouts and salmons with special reference to the Danubian trouts. Vést. Cesk. Spol. Zool. (Act. Soc. Zool. Bohem.) 32, 1–21.Google Scholar
  2. Balon, E.K. (1980) Early ontogeny of the lake charr, Salvelinus (Cristivomer) namaycush. In: Balon, E.K. (ed.), Charrs, Salmonid Fishes of the Genus Salvelinus. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 485–562.Google Scholar
  3. Boulenger, G.A. (1917) Sur l'origine marine du genre Salmo. Compt. Rend. l'Acad. Sci., Paris 164, 1041–1044.Google Scholar
  4. Buckland, F. (1873) Familiar History of British Fishes. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London. 420 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Cavender, T.M. and Miller, R.R. (1972) Smilodonichthys rastrosus — a new Pliocene salmonid fish. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Oregon 18, 1–44.Google Scholar
  6. Clemens, W.A. (1953) On some fundamental problems in the biology of Pacific salmons. Trans. Roy. Soc. Can. 47 (Ser. III, Sec. 5), 1–13.Google Scholar
  7. Day, F. (1887) British and Irish Salmonidae. Williams and Norgate, London. 298 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Queiroz, A. and Wimberger, P.H. (1993) The usefulness of behaviour for phylogeny estimation: Levels of homoplasy in behavioural and morphological characters. Evolution 47, 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobson, F.S. (1985) The use of phylogeny in behaviour and ecology. Evolution 39, 1384–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fink, W.L. and Weitzman, S.H. (1982) Relationships of stomiiform fishes (Teleostei), with a description of Diplophos. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harv. Univ. 150, 31–93.Google Scholar
  11. Fleming, J. (1828) A History of British Animals. Edinburgh and London. 565 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Foerster, R.E. (1968) The sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 162, 1–422.Google Scholar
  13. Foote, C.J., Mayer, I., Wood, C.C., Clarke, W.C. and Blackburn, J. (1994) On the developmental pathway to nonanadromy in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can. J. Zool. 72, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fyhn, H.J., Fin, R.N., Reith, M. and Norberg, B. (1999) Yolk protein hydrolysis and oocyte free amino acids as key features in the adaptive evolution of teleost fishes to seawater. Sarsia 84, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould, S.J. (1983) What, if anything else, is a zebra. Nat. Hist. (New York) 90(7), 6–12.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwood, P.H. (1993) Review of: Systematics, historical ecology and North American freshwater fishes. In: Mayden, R.L. (ed.), Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 3, 373–375.Google Scholar
  17. Günther, A. (1866) Catalogue of Fishes in the British Museum 6, 373–375.Google Scholar
  18. Healey, M.C., Henderson, M.A. and Burgetz, I. (2000) Precocial maturation of male sockeye salmon in the Fraser River, British Columbia, and its relationship to growth and year-class strength. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 2248–2257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heard, W.R. (1991) Life history of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). In: Groot, C. and Margolis, L. (eds.), Pacific Salmon Life Histories. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, pp. 119–230.Google Scholar
  20. Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois, Urbana, 263 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, G.D. and Patterson, C. (1996) Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes. In: Stiassny, M.L.J. Parenti, L.R. and Johnson, G.D. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes (2nd ed.). Academic, New York, pp. 251–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonsson, B. and Jonsson, N. (1993) Partial migration: niche shift versus sexual maturation in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 3, 348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoar, W.S. (1976) Smolt transformation: evolution, behaviour and physiology. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 33, 1233–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McAllister, D.E. (1963) A revision of the smelt family Osmeridae. Nat. Mus. Can. Bull. 191, 1–53.Google Scholar
  25. McCormick, S.D. and Saunders, R.L. (1987) Preparatory physiological adaptations for marine life of salmonids: osmoregulation, growth and metabolism. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 1, 211–229.Google Scholar
  26. McDowall, R.M. (1969) Relationships of galaxioid fishes, with a further discussion of salmoniform classification. Copeia 1969, 796–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDowall, R.M. (1988) Diadromy in Fishes: Migrations between Freshwater and Marine Environments. Croom Helm, London, 308 pp.Google Scholar
  28. McDowall, R.M. (1990) New Zealand Freshwater Fishes: A Natural history and Guide. Heinemann Reed, Auckland, 553 pp.Google Scholar
  29. McDowall, R.M. (1993) A recent marine ancestry for diadromous fishes? Sometimes yes, but mostly no. Environ. Biol. Fish. 37, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDowall, R.M. (1994) Gamekeepers for the Nation: the Story of New Zealand's Acclimatisation Societies, 1861–1990. Canterbury University, Christchurch, 508 pp.Google Scholar
  31. McDowall, R.M. (1997) The evolution of diadromy in fishes (revisited) and its place in phylogenetic analysis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7, 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDowall, R.M. (1999) Different kinds of diadromy: different conservation problems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDowall, R.M. (2001) Anadromy and homing: two life history traits with adaptive synergies in salmonid fishes. Fish Fish. 2, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McLennan, D.A., Brooks, D.R. and McPhail, J.D. (1988) The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: a case study using gasterosteid fishes. Can. J. Zool. 66, 2177–2190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayr, E. (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Belknap, Cambridge, 974 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Meek, A. (1916) The Migrations of Fishes. Arnold, London, 437 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Myers, G.S. (1949) Usage of anadromous, catadromous and allied terms for migratory fishes. Copeia 1949, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neave, F. (1958) The origin and speciation of Oncorhynchus. Trans. Roy. Soc. Can. 52 (ser 3), 25–39.Google Scholar
  39. Nelson, J.S. (1994) Fishes of the World (3rd ed.). Wiley, New York, 600 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Nolan, C. (1993) The history of Falkland Islands trout. The Warrah: Newsl. Falklands Cons. 4, 3 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Nordeng, H. (1983) Solution to the ‘char problem’ based on Artic char (Salvelinus alpinus) in Norway. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 40, 1372–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Northcote, T.G. (1992) Migration and residency in stream salmonids — some ecological considerations and evolutionary consequences. Nord. J. Freshw. Res. 67, 5–17.Google Scholar
  43. Parnell, R. (183) The natural and economical history of the fishes of the river district of the Firth of Forth. Mem. Wernerian Nat. Hist. Soc. 7, 161–460, 515–520.Google Scholar
  44. Pennant, T. (1776) Fishes. In: The British Zoology vol. 4. March, for Cymmrodorian Society, London.Google Scholar
  45. Paterson, A.M., Wallis, G.P. and Gray, R.D. (1995) Penguins, petrels, and parsimony: Does cladistic analysis of behaviour reflect reabird phylogeny? Evolution 49, 974–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Regan, C.T. (1911) The Freshwater Fishes of the British Isles. Methuen, London, 287 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Regan, C.T. (1914) The systematic arrangement of the fishes of the family Salmonidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 13 (ser 8), 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosen, D.E. (1974) Phylogeny and zoogeography of salmoniform fishes and relationships of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 153, 265–326.Google Scholar
  49. Rounsefell, G.A. (1958) Anadromy in North American Salmonidae. Fish. Bull. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. 62, 171–185.Google Scholar
  50. Saunders, R.L., Henderson, E.B. and Glebe, B.D. (1982) Precocious sexual maturation and smoltification in male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 28, 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silverstein, J.T. and Hershberger, W.K. (1992) Precocious maturation in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): estimation of additive genetic variance. J. Hered. 83, 282–286.Google Scholar
  52. Stearley, R.L. (1992) Historical ecology of Salmoninae, with special reference to Oncorhynchus. In: Mayden, R.L. (ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 622–758.Google Scholar
  53. Stearley, R.F. and Smith, G.R. (1993) Phylogeny of the Pacific trouts and salmons (Oncorhynchus) and genera of the family Salmonidae. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tchernavin, V. (1939) The origin of salmon: Is its ancestry marine or fresh water? Salm. Trout Mag. 95, 120–140.Google Scholar
  55. Thorpe, J.E. (1982) Migration in salmonids with special reference to juvenile movements in fresh water. In: Brannon, E.S. and Salo, E.O. (eds.), Proceedings of the Salmon and Trout Migratory Behaviour Symposium. School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, pp. 86–97.Google Scholar
  56. Thorpe, J.E. (1987) Smolting versus residency: developmental conflicts in salmonids. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 1, 224–252.Google Scholar
  57. Thorpe, J.E. (1988) Salmon migration. Sci. Progr. Oxford 72, 345–370.Google Scholar
  58. Vladykov, V.D. (1963) A review of the salmonoid genera and their broad geographical distribution. Trans. R. Soc. Can. 1, 459–505.Google Scholar
  59. Unwin, M.J., Kinnison, M.T. and Quinn, T.P. (1999) Exceptions to semelparity: Postmaturation survival, morphology and energetics of male chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1172–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wood, C.C. and Foote, C.J. (1996) Evidence for sympatric divergence of anadromous and non-anadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorchynchus nerka). Evolution 50, 1265–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.M. McDowall
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations