Plant Ecology

, Volume 161, Issue 1, pp 89–110 | Cite as

Nonequilibrium dynamics of sedge meadows grazed by cattle in southern Wisconsin

  • Beth Middleton


Equilibrium theory predicts that after disturbance, ecosystemseventually regain the structural and functional properties characteristic oftheir predisturbance condition. This study tested this idea by examining theeffects of cattle grazing and exclusion on the long-term structuralcharacteristics of sedge meadows in southern Wisconsin. To compare structuralchanges in mean percentage cover and height, repeated measures analysis wasconducted on two sedge meadows over a twenty year period from 1977 to 1997. Onesedge meadow was recovering from cattle grazing (cattle excluded in 1973) andthe other was a reference area (nearly undisturbed). Both of these study siteschanged structurally from 1977 to 1997, supporting non-equilibrium theory.Additional observations were made in a heavily and lightly grazed sedge meadowthat were surveyed in 1977. As based on the positions of subunits in anordination graph produced using Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS), therecovery sedge meadow became less structurally similar to the grazed and moresimilar to the reference site over the 20 year study. However, from theperspective of mean maximum height in another NMS analysis, the recovery sedgemeadow became less similar to the reference site over time likely because by1997, a shrub carr of Cornus sericea had developed in therecovery sedge meadow that had been dominated by graminoids and forbs in 1977(mean maximum height: 1977 vs. 1997; 0 vs. 47 cm). Seedlings ofCornus sericea were invading the grazed sedge meadows andin the recovery sedge meadow (cattle excluded 4 years earlier) in 1977. A shrubcarr did not develop in the reference sedge meadow. Changes in the referencesite were relatively minor over this time interval; certain species eitherincreased or decreased in dominance, e.g., Carex strictaincreased in cover (1977 vs. 1997, 20 and 28 mean percentage (%) cover,respectively). A few short-term species of the recovery sedge meadow followedthe tenets of equilibrium theory. These became less common or disappeared4–9 years after cattle exclusion including Asterlanceolatus, Calamagrostis canadensis,Poa compressa, Solidago altissima andVerbena hastata. Some of these species were eaten andlikely spread by the cattle. This study suggests that the progression of sedgemeadow to shrub carr may not be an inevitable outcome of succession but insteadcan be a consequence of past cattle grazing history. Also, because the recoveryand the reference sedge both changed structurally over time, the tenets ofnon-equilibrium theory were supported by this study.

Carex stricta Cattle grazing Cornus sericea Disturbance dynamics Fen Shrub carr Succession 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrew M.H. 1988. Grazing impact in relation to livestock watering points. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3: 336–339.Google Scholar
  2. Barrat-Segretain M.H. 1996. Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: a review. Vegetatio 123: 13–37.Google Scholar
  3. Baskin J.M. and Baskin C.C. 1980. Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Ecology 61: 475–480.Google Scholar
  4. Bedford B.L., Zimmerman E.H. and Zimmerman J.H. 1974. The Wetlands of Dane County, Wisconsin. Dane County Regional Planning Commission, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  5. Bowles M., McBridge J., Stoynoff N. and Johnson K. 1996. Temporal changes in vegetation composition and structure in a fire-managed prairie fen. Natural Areas Journal 16: 275–288.Google Scholar
  6. Cairns J. and Pratt J.R. 1995. Ecological restoration through behavioral change. Restoration Ecology 3: 51–53.Google Scholar
  7. Case R.L. and Kauffman J.B. 1997. Wild ungulate influences on the recovery of willows, black cottonwood and thin-leaf alder following cessation of cattle grazing in northeastern Oregon. Northwest Science 71: 115–126.Google Scholar
  8. Chapin F.S., Torn M.S. and Tateno M. 1996. Principles of ecosystem sustainability. The American Naturalist 148: 1016–1037.Google Scholar
  9. Clary W.P. 1995. Vegetation and soil responses to grazing simulation on riparian meadows. Journal of Range Management 48: 18–25.Google Scholar
  10. Cook C.D.K. 1987. Dispersion in aquatic and amphibious vascular plants. In: Crawford R.M.M. (ed.), Plant Life in Aquatic and Amphibious Habitats. Special Publication Number 5 of the British Ecological Society Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
  11. Cook G.D., Setterfield S.A. and Maddison J.P. 1996. Shrub invasion of a tropical wetland: implications for weed management. Ecological Applications 6: 531–537.Google Scholar
  12. Costello D.F. 1936. Tussock meadows in southeastern Wisconsin. Botanical Gazette 97: 610–648.Google Scholar
  13. Curtis J.T. 1971. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  14. Dumortier M., Verlinden A., Beeckman H. and van der Mijnsbrugge K. 1996. Effects of harvesting dates and frequencies on above and below-ground dynamics in Belgian wet grasslands. Ecoscience 3: 190–198.Google Scholar
  15. Ellison L. 1960. Influence of grazing on plant succession of rangelands. The Botanical Review 26: 1–78.Google Scholar
  16. Fenner M. 1985. Seed ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  17. Fleischner T.L. 1994. Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America. Conservation Biology 8: 629–644.Google Scholar
  18. Gleason H.A. and Cronquist A. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Grant S.A., Torvell L., Smith H.K., Suckling D.E., Forbes T.D.A. and Hodgson J. 1987. Comparative studies of diet selection by sheep and cattle: blanket bog and heather moor. Ecology 75: 947–960.Google Scholar
  20. Grime J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86: 902–910.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen K. and Jensen J. 1993. Recolonization of experimentally bared soil in a grazed common in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Botany 13: 431–440.Google Scholar
  22. Hosner J.F. and Boyce S.G. 1962. Tolerance to water saturated soil of various bottomland hardwoods. Forestry Science 8: 180–186.Google Scholar
  23. Hurlbert S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.Google Scholar
  24. Hutnik R.J. and Yauney H.W. 1965. Red maple (Acer rubrum L.). In: Fowells H.A. (ed.), Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States. U.S.D.A. agricultural handbook United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson H.H.T. 1961. Mammals of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  26. Johansson M.E. and Nilsson C. 1993. Hydrochory, population dynamics and distribution of the clonal aquatic plant Ranunculus lingua. Journal of Ecology 81: 81–91.Google Scholar
  27. Jutila H.M. 1997. Vascular plant species richness in grazed and ungrazed coastal meadows, SW Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici 34: 245–263.Google Scholar
  28. Kauffman J.B., Case R.L., Lytjen D., Otting N. and Cummings D.L. 1995. Ecological approaches to riparian restoration in northeast Oregon. Restoration and Management Notes 13: 12–15.Google Scholar
  29. Kie J.G. and Boroski B.B. 1996. Cattle distribution, habitats, and diets in the Sierra Nevada of California. Journal of Range Management 49: 482–488.Google Scholar
  30. Kirk R.A. 1995. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd edition. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California.Google Scholar
  31. Kimura D. 1985. Feral cattle (Bos taurus) on Kuchinoshima Island, southwestern Japan: their stable ranging and their unstable grouping. Journal of Ethology 3: 39–47.Google Scholar
  32. Liegel K. 1988. Land use and vegetational change on the Aldo Leopold Memorial Reserve. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 76: 47–68.Google Scholar
  33. Leck M.A. and Graveline K.J. 1979. The seed bank of a freshwater tidal marsh. American Journal of Botany 66: 1006–1015.Google Scholar
  34. Malo J.E. and Suárez F. 1995. Establishment of pasture species on cattle dung: the role of endozoochorous seeds. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 169–174.Google Scholar
  35. Manly B., McDonald L. and Thomas D. 1993. Resource Selection by Animals. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  36. Martin L. 1932. The physical geography of Wisconsin. Geological Natural History Survey Bulletin 36, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  37. McCune B. and Mefford M.J. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.Google Scholar
  38. McKnight J.S. 1965. Black willow (Salix nigra Marsh.). In:, Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States. USDA Agricultural Handbook United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., pp. 650–652.Google Scholar
  39. McKnight J.S., Hook D.D., Langdon O.G. and Johnson R.L. 1981. Flood tolerance and related characteristics of trees of the bottomland forest of the southern United States. In: Clark J.R. and Benforado J. (eds), Wetlands of Bottomland Hardwood Forests, Proceedings of a Workshop on Bottomland Hardwood Wetlands of the Southeastern United States. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 29–69.Google Scholar
  40. Meredith T.C. 1985. Factors affecting recruitment from the seed bank of sedge (Cladium mariscus) dominated communities at Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire, England. Journal of Biogeography 12: 463–472.Google Scholar
  41. Middleton B.A. 1978. Vegetational response to grazing in the Lodi Wildlife Area. Senior, University of Wisconsin, Madison (unpublished).Google Scholar
  42. Middleton B.A. 1995. The Role of Flooding in Seed Dispersal: Restoration of Cypress Swamps Along the Cache River, Illinois. Research Report 220, November 1995, U.S. Geological Survey and Water Resources Center, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
  43. Middleton B.A. 1998. The Water Buffalo Controversy in the Keoladeo National Park, India. Ecological Modelling 106: 93–98.Google Scholar
  44. Middleton B.A. 1999. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Middleton B.A., van der Valk A.G., Mason D.H., Williams R.L. and Davis C.B. 1991. Vegetation dynamics and seed banks of a monsoonal wetland overgrown with Paspalum distichum in northern India. Aquatic Botany 40: 239–259.Google Scholar
  46. Middleton B.A. and Mason D.H. 1992. Seed herbivory by nilgai, feral cattle, and wild boar in the Keoladeo National Park, India. Biotropica 24: 538–543.Google Scholar
  47. Moran R.C. 1981. Prairie fens in northeastern Illinois: floristic composition and disturbance. In: Stuckey R.L. and Reese K.J. (eds), The Prairie Peninsula-In the Shadow of “Transeau”: Proceedings of the Sixth North American Prairie Conference. Ohio Biological Survey Notes 15, pp. 164–168.Google Scholar
  48. Mt. Pleasant J. and Schlather K.J. 1994. Incidence of weed seed in cow (Bos sp.) manure and its importance as a weed source for cropland. Weed Technology 8: 304–310.Google Scholar
  49. Noble I.R. and Slatyer R.O. 1977. The effect of disturbance on plant succession. In: Anderson D. (ed.), Exotic Species in Australia - Their Establishment and Success, vol. 10. Ecological Society of Australia, Canberra, pp. 135–145.Google Scholar
  50. Pederson R.L. 1981. Seed bank characteristics of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba: application for wetland management. In: Richardson B. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management. St. Paul, Minnesota, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
  51. Popolizio C.A., Goetz H. and Chapman P.L. 1994. Short-term response of riparian vegetation to 4 grazing treatments. Journal of Range Management 47: 48–53.Google Scholar
  52. Powelson R.A. and Lieffers V.J. 1992. Effect of light and nutrients on biomass allocation in Calamagrostis canadensis. Ecography 15: 31–36.Google Scholar
  53. Prince H. 1997. Wetlands of the American Midwest. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  54. Putnam J.A., Furnival G.M. and McKnight J.S. 1960. Management and Inventory of Southern Hardwoods. U.S.D.A. Agricultural Handbook 181. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  55. Reice S.R. 1994. Nonequilibrium determinants of biological community structure. American Scientist 82: 424–435.Google Scholar
  56. Resh V.H., Brown A.V., Covich A.P., Gurtz M.E., Li H.W., Minshall G.W. et al. 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the American Benthological Society 7: 433–455.Google Scholar
  57. Reuter D.D. 1986. Wetland shrub management study (Wisconsin). Restoration and Management Notes 4: 29.Google Scholar
  58. Rogers D. 1959. Ecological effects of cutting in southern Wisconsin woodlots. PhD Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  59. Rydin H. and Borgegård S. 1991. Plant characteristics over a century of primary succession on islands: Lake Hjälmaren. Ecology 72: 1089–1101.Google Scholar
  60. SAS JMP 1998. JMP statistics and graphics guide, Version 3. Statistical Analysis System, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  61. Schneider R.L. and Sharitz R.R. 1986. Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73: 1022–1030.Google Scholar
  62. Schulz T.T. and Leininger W.C. 1990. Differences in riparian vegetation structure between grazed areas and exclosures. Journal of Range Management 43: 295–299.Google Scholar
  63. Scott D., Dick R.D. and Hunter G.G. 1988. Changes in the tussock grasslands in the central Waimakariri River basin, Canterbury, New Zealand, 1947-1981. New Zealand Journal of Botany 26: 197–222.Google Scholar
  64. Senft R.L., Rittenhouse L.R. and Woodmansee R.G. 1985. Factors influencing selection of resting sites by cattle on shortgrass steppe. Journal of Range Management 38: 295–299.Google Scholar
  65. Shipley B. and Parent M. 1991. Germination responses of 64 wetland species in relation to seed size, minimum time to reproduction and seedling relative growth rate. Functional Ecology 5: 111–118.Google Scholar
  66. Smith L.M. and Kadlec J.A. 1983. Seed banks and their role during drawdown of a North American marsh. Journal of Applied Ecology 20: 673–684.Google Scholar
  67. Staniforth R.J. and Cavers P.B. 1976. An experimental study of water dispersal in Polygonum spp. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 2587–2596.Google Scholar
  68. Stover M.E. and Marks P.L. 1998. Successional Vegetation on Abandoned Cultivated and Pastured Land in Tompkins County, New York. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125: 150–164.Google Scholar
  69. Thompson K. and Grime J.P. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67: 893–921.Google Scholar
  70. Tsuyuzaki S., Urano S. and Tsujii T. 1990. Vegetation of alpine marshland and its neighboring areas, northern part of Sichuan Province, China. Vegetatio 88: 79–86.Google Scholar
  71. van der Pijl L. 1982. Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants, Third Edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  72. van der Valk A.G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62: 688–696.Google Scholar
  73. van der Valk A.G. and Davis C.B. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.Google Scholar
  74. van der Valk A.G. and Verhoeven J.T.A. 1988. Potential role of seed banks and understory species in restoring quaking fens from floating forests. Vegetatio 76: 3–13.Google Scholar
  75. van der Valk A.G. and Pederson R.L. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L. (eds), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 329–346.Google Scholar
  76. van Wieren S.E. 1991. Management of population of large mammals. In: Spellerberg I.F., Goldsmith F.B. and Morris M.G. (eds), The Scientific Management of Temperate Communities for Conservation, The 31st Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Southhampton, UK. Blackwell, London, pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
  77. Vermeer J.G. and Joosten J.H.J. 1992. Conservation and management of bog and fen reserves in the Netherlands. In: Verhoeven J.T.A. (ed.), Fens and Bogs in the Netherlands: Vegetation, History, Nutrient Dynamics and Conservation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 433–478.Google Scholar
  78. Wienhold C.E. and van der Valk A.G. 1989. The impact of duration of drainage on the seed banks of northern prairie wetlands. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1878–1884.Google Scholar
  79. White K.L. 1965. Shrub-carrs of southeastern Wisconsin. Ecology 46: 286–304.Google Scholar
  80. White P.S. and Pickett S.T.A. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In: White P.S. and Pickett S.T.A. (eds), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
  81. Williams R.J. and Ashton D.H. 1987. Effects of disturbance and grazing by cattle on the dynamics of heathland and grassland communities on the Bogon High Plains, Victoria. Australian Journal of Botany 35: 413–431.Google Scholar
  82. Wisheu I.C. and Keddy P.A. 1991. Seed banks of a rare wetland plant community: distribution patterns and effects of human-induced disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 181–188.Google Scholar
  83. Zimmerman J.H. 1983. The revegetation of a small Yahara Valley prairie fen. Wisconsin Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 71: 87–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth Middleton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations