Euphytica

, Volume 127, Issue 3, pp 445–458

Participatory varietal selection in rice in Nepal in favourable agricultural environments – A comparison of two methods assessed by varietal adoption

  • K.D. Joshi
  • J.R. Witcombe
Article

Abstract

Two participatory approaches to varietal selection were compared in February-sown (Chaite) rice and main-season rice in high potential production systems in Nepal. One method, called farmer managed participatory research (FAMPAR), was researcher intensive, while the other, called informal research and development (IRD), demanded fewer resources. The trials were conducted in 18 villages in high potential production systems in Chitwan and Nawalparasi districts of Nepal. Six new varieties of Chaite rice and 16 of main-season rice were tested in over 300 trials of Chaite rice and nearly 1100 trials of main-season rice over two years in 1997 and 1998. Surveys were done in 1997, 1998 and 1999 to record the extent of adoption and spread of the new rice varieties in the study villages. In many cases, farmers tested varieties for two years before deciding whether to adopt or drop them. Varieties were quite widely accepted, adopted for niches in a few villages, or rejected. The two participatory approaches identified the same varieties, but FAMPAR, which used formal survey methods, was more useful for diagnosing reasons for adoption or rejection. However, IRD used much cheaper anecdotal methods of evaluation, so it was more cost-effective. Moreover,farmer-to-farmer seed dissemination was higher in IRD villages, probably because farmers in FAMPAR villages felt that the project would re-supply seed if needed. The benefits from both approaches are considerable, but to adopt them substantial policy changes in varietal testing, release and extension systems will be required.

adoption farmer-managed participatory research(FAMPAR) informal research and development (IRD) rice participatoryvarietal selection (PVS) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brennan, J.P. & M.L. Morris, 2001. Economic issues in assessing the role of physiology in wheat breeding programs. In: M.P. Reynolds, J.I. Ortiz-Monasterio & A. McNab (Eds.), Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding, pp. 78–86. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  2. Chivler, A.S. & R. Suherman, 1994. Patterns, processes and impacts of technology diffusion: the case of true potato seed (TPS) in Indonesia. J Asia Farming Systems Assoc 2: 285–304.Google Scholar
  3. Debrah, S.K., D. Sanogo & F.O. Boadu, 1996. On-farm experiments with sorghum to assess the acceptability of new varieties and herbicide treatments. Expl Agric 32: 219–223.Google Scholar
  4. DTZ Peida Consulting, 1998. An Evaluation Study of Participatory Crop Improvement in Nepal. A Final Report Prepared for the Department for International Development. DTZ Peida Planning, Economic and Development Consultants, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Expl Agric 32: 461–477.Google Scholar
  6. Joshi, K.D. & B.R. Sthapit, 1990. Informal Research and Development (IRD): A New Approach to Research and Extension. LARC Discussion Paper 1990/4. Lumle Agricultural Research Centre, Pokhara, Nepal.Google Scholar
  7. Joshi, K.D., M. Subedi, R.B. Rana, K.B. Kadayat & B.R. Sthapit, 1997. Enhancing on-farm varietal diversity through participatory varietal selection: a case study for Chaite rice in Nepal. Expl Agric 33: 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joshi, K.D., 2000. Rice varietal diversity and participatory crop improvement in Nepal. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
  9. Kadayat, K.B., E. Kiff, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1991. Extension implications of farmer participatory research. Seminar Paper No. 10/91. Pokhara Nepal: Lumle Agricultural Research Centre, Pokhara, Nepal.Google Scholar
  10. Maurya, D.M., A. Bottrall & J. Farrington, 1988. Improved livelihoods, genetic diversity and farmer participation: a strategy for rice breeding in rainfed areas of India. Expl Agric 24: 311–320.Google Scholar
  11. Sperling, L., M.E. Loevinsohn & B. Ntabomvura, 1993. Rethinking the farmers' role in plant breeding: Local bean experts and onstation selection in Rwanda. Expl Agric 29: 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thiele, G., G. Gardner, R. Torrez & J. Gabriel, 1997. Farmer involvement in selecting new varieties: Potatoes in Bolivia. Expl Agric 33: 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. WARDA, 1999. Participatory Varietal Selection: The Spark that Lit a Flame. West Africa Rice Development Association (WARDA): Bouaké, Côte d' Ivoire.Google Scholar
  14. Weltzein, E., M. Smith, L.S. Meitzner & L. Sperling, 2000. Technical issues in participatory plant breeding from the perspective of formal plant breeding. A global analysis of issues, results and current experiences. Working Document No. 3. CGIAR, Systemwide Programme on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.Google Scholar
  15. Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Expl Agric 32: 445–460.Google Scholar
  16. Witcombe, J.R., R. Petre, S. Jones & A. Joshi, 1999. Farmer participatory crop improvement. IV. The spread and impact of a rice variety identified by participatory varietal selection. Expl Agric 35: 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Witcombe, J.R, K.D. Joshi, R.B. Rana & D.S. Virk, 2001. Increasing genetic diversity by participatory varietal selection in high-potential production systems in Nepal and India. Euphytica 122: 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Witcombe, J.R., 2001. The impact of decentralized and participatory plant breeding on the genetic base of crops. In: H.D. Cooper, C. Spillane & T. Hodgkin (Eds.), Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production, pp. 407–417. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • K.D. Joshi
    • 1
  • J.R. Witcombe
    • 2
  1. 1.Local Initiatives for BiodiversityResearch and Development (LI-BIRD)PokharaNepal
  2. 2.Centre for Arid Zone StudiesUniversity of WalesBangorU.K

Personalised recommendations