Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 11, Issue 10, pp 1825–1843

Tree species richness complementarity, disturbance and fragmentation in a Mexican tropical montane cloud forest

  • Guadalupe Williams-Linera
Article
  • 961 Downloads

Abstract

Tropical montane cloud forest exhibits great heterogeneity in speciescomposition and structure over short geographic distances. In central Veracruz,Mexico, the conservation priority of seven cloud forest fragments was assessedby considering differences in woody plant species richness and complementarityof species among sites, forest structure, tree mortality, and timber andfirewood extraction as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance. Densities oftrees ≥5 cm dbh (360–1700 trees/ha) weredifferent among the sites, but basal area (35.3–89.3m2/ha) did not differ among fragments. The number of dead trees rangedfrom 10–30 to 170–200 trees/ha. The fragments'species composition was different but complementary. The Morisita–Hornindex indicated low similarity between fragments. A non-parametric estimator ofspecies richness indicated that more sampling effort would be necessary tocomplete the inventory (15 additional trees and two understory shrub species).Unfortunately, most of the fragments are threatened with deforestation. The numberof cut trees was similar among sites (0–15 cut trees/0.1 ha).Sites with immediate need for conservation were close to settlements, with highnumbers of cut trees and no legal protection. The selected sites represent thevariety of situations that exist in the region. Given the high complementarityobserved between fragments, a regional conservation approach will be required topreserve the last repositories of part of the tremendous biodiversity of theonce continuous forest in this region.

Community structure Complementarity Conservation Disturbance Fragments Species diversity Species richness Tree mortality Tropical montane cloud forest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich M., Billington C., Edwards M. and Laidlawl R. 1997. Tropical montane cloud forests: an urgent priority for conservation. Conservation Monitoring Centre Biodiversity Bulletin no. 2. WCMC, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Arriaga L. 1988. Gap dynamics of a tropical cloud forest in Northeastern Mexico. Biotropica 20: 178–184.Google Scholar
  3. Blake G.R. 1979. Bulk density. In: Black C.A., Evans D.D., White J.L., Ensminger L.E. and Clark F.E. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis (Part 1). American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 374–390.Google Scholar
  4. Carey E.V., Brown S., Gillespie A.J.R. and Lugo A.E. 1994. Tree mortality in mature lowland tropical moist and tropical lower montane moist forests of Venezuela. Biotropica 26: 255–265.Google Scholar
  5. Challenger A. 1998. EsUtilización y Conservación de los Ecosistemas Terrestres de México. Pasado, Presente y Futuro. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. UNAM, Agrupación Sierra Madre, S.C., México, DF.Google Scholar
  6. Chazdon R.L., Colwell R.K., Denslow J.S. and Guariguata M.R. 1998. Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. In: Dallmeier F. and Comiskey J.A. (eds), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modelling. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris, pp. 285–309.Google Scholar
  7. Churchill S.T., Balslev H., Forero E. and Luteyn J.L. 1995. Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forests. Proceedings of the Neotropical Montane Forest Biodiversity and Conservation Symposium, The New York Botanical Garden, 21–26 June 1993. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Colwell R.K. 1997. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User's Guide and Application. Published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimatesGoogle Scholar
  9. Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B 345: 101–118.Google Scholar
  10. Curtis J.T. and McIntosh R.P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie–forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476–496.Google Scholar
  11. Doumenge C., Gilmour D., Ruiz Perez M. and Blockhus J. 1995. Tropical montane cloud forests: conservation status and management issues. In: Hamilton L.S., Juvik J.O. and Scatena F.N. (eds), Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 24–37.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher B.L. 1999. Improving inventory efficiency: a case study of leaf-litter ant diversity in Madagascar. Ecological Applications 9: 714–731.Google Scholar
  13. Gentry A.H. 1995. Patterns of diversity and floristic composition in Neotropical montane forests. In: Churchill S.T., Balslev H., Forero E. and Luteyn J.L. (eds), Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forests. Proceedings of the Neotropical Montane Forest Biodiversity and Conservation Symposium, The New York Botanical Garden, 21–26 June 1993. New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp. 103–126.Google Scholar
  14. Grubb P.J. 1977. Control of forest growth and distribution on wet tropical mountains: with special reference to mineral nutrition. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 83–107.Google Scholar
  15. Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913–934.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton L.S., Juvik J.O. and Scatena F.N. 1995a. Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Hamilton L.S., Juvik J.O. and Scatena F.N. 1995b. The Puerto Rican tropical cloud forest symposium: introduction and workshop synthesis. In: Hamilton L.S., Juvik J.O. and Scatena F.N. (eds), Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  18. Kappelle M., Geuze T., Leal M.E. and Cleef A.M. 1996. Successional age and forest structure in a Costa Rican upper montane Quercus forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 681–698.Google Scholar
  19. Keddy P.A. and Drummond C.G. 1996. Ecological properties for the evaluation, management, and restoration of temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Ecological Applications 6: 748–762.Google Scholar
  20. Lawton R.O. and Putz F.E. 1988. Natural disturbance and gap-phase regeneration in a wind-exposed tropical cloud forest. Ecology 69: 764–777.Google Scholar
  21. LauranceW.F., Ferreira L.V., Rankin-de Merona J.M. and Laurance S.G. 1998. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79: 2032–2040.Google Scholar
  22. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurements. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  23. Mesquita R.C.G., Delamonica P. and Laurance W.F. 1999. Effect of surrounding vegetation on edgerelated tree mortality in Amazonian forest fragments. Biological Conservation 91: 129–134.Google Scholar
  24. Nadkarni N. and Wheelwright N. 2000. Monteverde: Ecology and Conservation of a Tropical Cloud Forest. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Nadkarni N., Matelson T.J. and HaberW.A. 1995. Structural characteristics and floristic composition of a Neotropical cloud forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11: 481–495.Google Scholar
  26. Pedersen B.S. 1999. The mortality of midwestern overstory oaks as a bioindicator of environmental stress. Ecological Applications 9: 1017–1027.Google Scholar
  27. Rzedowski J. 1993. Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico. In: Ramamoorthy T.P., Bye R., Lot A. and Fa J. (eds), Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
  28. Rzedowski J. 1996. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 35: 24–44.Google Scholar
  29. Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J. and Margules C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–32.Google Scholar
  30. SAS 1997. JMP User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  31. Schelhas J. and Greenberg R. 1996. Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Sosa V. and Gómez-Pompa A. 1994. Flora de Veracruz. Lista florística. Fascículo 82. Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, Veracruz and University of California, Riverside, California.Google Scholar
  33. Tabarelli M., Mantovani W. and Peres C.A. 1999. Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant guild structure in the montane Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Biological Conservation 91: 119–127.Google Scholar
  34. ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to CANOCO for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Turner I.M. and Corlett R.T. 1996. The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 330–333.Google Scholar
  36. Walkley O. and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38.Google Scholar
  37. Williams-Linera G. 1990.Vegetation structure and environmental conditions of forest edges in Panama. Journal of Ecology 78: 356–373.Google Scholar
  38. Williams-Linera G. 1997. Phenology of deciduous and broadleaved-evergreen tree species in a Mexican tropical lower montane forest. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6: 115–127.Google Scholar
  39. Williams-Linera G., Pérez-García I. and Tolome J. 1996. El bosque mesófilo de montana y un gradiente altitudinal en el centro de Veracruz, México. La Palabra y el Hombre 23: 149–161.Google Scholar
  40. Williams-Linera G., Manson R.H. and Isunza-Vera E. 2002. EsLa fragmentación del bosque mesófilo de ∼montana y patrones de uso del suelo en la región oeste de Xalapa, Veracruz, México. Madera y Bosques 8: 3–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guadalupe Williams-Linera
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Ecología, A.C.XalapaMexico

Personalised recommendations