International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 325–337 | Cite as

Population Variation in Patch and Party Size in Muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides)

  • Pedro Luís Rodrigues de Moraes
  • Oswaldo de CarvalhoJr.
  • Karen B. StrierEmail author


We examined the relationship between food patch size and feeding party size with comparative data from two populations of muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides) in the 37,797-ha forest at the Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho (PECB), São Paulo, and the 800-ha forest at the Estação Biológica de Caratinga (EBC), Minas Gerais. Precipitation was more abundant and less seasonal at PECB than EBC, and the density of large trees (>25.0 cm) was higher at PECB (206 ha−1) than at EBC (132 ha−1). At both sites, the size of feeding parties is positively related to the size of food patches. As predicted, food patches at PECB are significantly larger than those at EBC for both fruit and leaf sources. Contrary to expectations, feeding parties were larger at EBC than PECB. The higher population density of muriquis and sympatric primates at EBC may make large associations more advantageous to these muriquis than to muriquis living at lower population densities in PECB.

Brachyteles arachnoides muriqui patch size feeding party size forest structure population density 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ab'Saber, A. N. (1977). Os domínios morfoclimáticos da América do Sul. Geomorfologia 52:1-23.Google Scholar
  2. Chapman, C. A. (1988). Patch use and patch depletion by the spider and howling monkeys of Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. Behaviour 105: 99-116.Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, C. A., White, F. J., and Wrangham, R. W. (1994). Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos. In Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M., and Heltne, P. G. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 41-57.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, C. A., Wrangham, R. W., and Chapman, L. J. (1995). Ecological constraints on group size: An analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 59-70.Google Scholar
  5. Crockett, C. M. (1996). The relation between red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) troop size and population growth in two habitats. In Norconk, M. A., Rosenberger, A. L., and Garber, P. A. (eds.), Adaptive Radiations of Neotropical Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 489-510.Google Scholar
  6. de Carvalho, O., Jr. (1996). Dieta, Padróes de Atividade e de Agrupamento do Mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides) no Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho-SP, M.A. thesis, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém.Google Scholar
  7. Domingues, E. N., and Silva, D. A. (1988). Geomorfologia do Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho. Bol. Tec. Inst. Florestal 42: 71-105.Google Scholar
  8. Fonseca, G. A. B. (1985). The vanishing Brazillian Atlantic forest. Biol. Conserv. 34: 17-34.Google Scholar
  9. Hartshorn, G. S. (1983). Plants. In Janzen, D. H. (ed.), Costa Rican Natural History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 118-157.Google Scholar
  10. Hatton, J. C., Smart, N. O. C., and Thomson, K. (1983). An ecological study of the Fazenda Montes Claros forest, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Interim report, Department of Botany and Microbiology, University College of London, London.Google Scholar
  11. Janson, C. H. (1988). Intra-specific food competition and primate social structure: A synthesis. Behaviour 105: 1-17.Google Scholar
  12. Leighton, M., and Leighton, D. R. (1982). The relationships of size of feeding aggregate to size of food patch: Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding in Trichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island. Biotropica 14: 81-90.Google Scholar
  13. Lemos de Sá, R. M., and Strier, K. B. (1992). A preliminary comparison of forest structure and use by two isolated groups of woolly spider monkeys, Brachyteles arachnoides. Biotropica 24(3): 455-459.Google Scholar
  14. McFarland, M. J. (1986). Ecological determinants of fission-fusion sociality in Ateles and Pan. In Else, J. G., and Lee, P. C. (eds.), Primate Ecology and Conservation, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 181-190.Google Scholar
  15. Moraes, P. L. R. (1992a). Espécies utilizadas na alimentação do mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides) E. Geoffroy, 1806) no Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho. In Congresso Nacional Sobre Essências Nativas, 2, 1992, São Paulo. Anais. Revista Inst Florestal 4(4): 1206-1208.Google Scholar
  16. Moraes, P. L. R. (1992b). Dispersão de sementes pelo mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides) E. Geoffroy, 1806) no Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho. In Congresso Nacional Sobre Essências Nativas, 2, 1992, São Paulo. Anais. Revista Inst. Florestal 4(4): 1193-1198.Google Scholar
  17. Moraes, P. L. R. (1993). Caracterização Morfológica de Frutos. Sementes e Plântulas de Espécies da Familia Lauraceae no Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho, São Paulo, Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas), Instituto de Biociências, UNESP, Rio Claro.Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, P. G., and Lugo, A. E. (1986). Ecology of tropical dry forest. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 67-88.Google Scholar
  19. Negreiros, O. C. (1982). Características fitossociológicas de uma comunidade de floresta latifoliada pluviosa tropical visando ao manejo do palmito, Euterpe edulis Mart, ESALQ/USP, Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal), Piracicaba.Google Scholar
  20. Overdorff, D. J. (1996). Ecological correlates to social structure in two lemur species in Madagascar. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 100: 487-506.Google Scholar
  21. Paccagnella, S. G. (1991). Censo da população de monos (Brachyteles arachnoides) do Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho, estado de São Paulo. In Rylands, A. B., and Bernardes, A. T. (eds.), A Primatologia no Brasil-3, Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, pp. 225-238.Google Scholar
  22. Peres, C. A. (1996). Use of space, spatial group structure, and foraging group size of gray wooly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha cana) at Urucu, Brazil. In Norconk, M. A., Rosenberger, A. L., and Garber, P. A. (eds.), Adaptive Radiations of Neotropical Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 467-488.Google Scholar
  23. Pinto, L. P. S., Costa, C. M. R., Strier, K. B., and Fonseca, G. A. B. (1993). Habitats, density, and group size of primates in the Reserva Biologica Augusto Ruschi (Nova Lombardia), Santa Teresa, Brazil. Folia Primatol. 61: 135-143.Google Scholar
  24. Printes, R. C., Costa, C. G., and Strier, K. B. (1996). Possible predation on two infant muriquis, Brachyteles arachnoides, at the Estação Biologica de Caratinga, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Neotrop. Primates 4(3): 85-86.Google Scholar
  25. Romariz, D. A. (1964). A vegetação. In Azevedo, A. (Coord.), Brasil: A Terra e o Homem, São Paulo, Editora Nacional., Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  26. Stallings, J. R., and Robinson, J. G. (1991). Disturbance, forest heterogeneity and primate communities in a Brazilian Atlantic forest park. In Rylands, A. B., and Bernardes, A. T. (eds.), A Primatologia no Brasil-3, Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, pp. 357-368.Google Scholar
  27. Strier, K. B. (1987). Ranging behavior of woolly spider monkeys. Int. J. Primatol. 8: 575-591.Google Scholar
  28. Strier, K. B. (1989). Effects of patch size on feeding associations in muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). Folia Primatol. 52(1/2): 70-77.Google Scholar
  29. Strier, K. B. (1991). Diet in one group of woolly spider monkeys, or muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). Am. J. Primatol. 23: 113-126.Google Scholar
  30. Strier, K. B. (1992). Atelinae adaptations: Behavioral strategies and ecological constraints. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 85: 515-524.Google Scholar
  31. Strier, K. B. (1996). Reproductive ecology of female muriquis. In Norconk, M. A., Rosenberger, A. L., and Garber, P. A. (eds.), Adaptative Radiations of Neotropical Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 511-532.Google Scholar
  32. Strier, K. B., Mendes, F. D. C., Rimoli, J., and Rimoli, A. O. (1993). Demography and social structure in one group of muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). Int. J. Primatol. 14: 513-526.Google Scholar
  33. Stuart, M. D., Strier, K. B., and Pierberg, S. M. (1993). A coprological survey of parasites of wild muriquis, Brachyteles arachnoides, and brown howling monkeys, Alouatta fusca. J. Helminthol. Soc. Washington 60: 111-115.Google Scholar
  34. Symington, M. M. (1988). Food competition and foraging party size in the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek). Behaviour 105: 117-134.Google Scholar
  35. Terborgh, J., and Janson, C. H. (1986). The socioecology of primate groups. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 111-135.Google Scholar
  36. Van Schaik, C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In Standen, V., and Foley, R. A. (eds.), Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioral Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals, Blackwell Scientific, Boston, MA, pp. 195-218.Google Scholar
  37. White, F. J., and Wrangham, R. W. (1988). Feeding competition and patch size in the chimpanzee species Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes. Behaviour 105: 148-164.Google Scholar
  38. Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262-299.Google Scholar
  39. Wrangham, R. W. (1986). Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzees. In Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.), Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 352-378.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Luís Rodrigues de Moraes
    • 1
  • Oswaldo de CarvalhoJr.
    • 2
  • Karen B. Strier
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Botany, Institute of BiosciencesState University of São Paulo (UNESP)Rio Claro, São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (IPAM)Belém, ParáBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Anthropology University of Wisconsin—MadisonMadison

Personalised recommendations