Advertisement

Tree composition and structure in disturbed stands with varying dominance by Pinus spp. in the highlands of Chiapas, México

  • 221 Accesses

  • 53 Citations

Abstract

We studied soil and forest floor conditions, regeneration patterns oftrees, and forest structure and floristic composition along a gradient ofdominance by Pinus spp. in disturbed stands in thehighlands of Chiapas, southern Mexico. Seedlings, saplings, and adults of treespecies were counted and measured in 2-3 circular plots (1000m2 each) in 36 forest stands (a total of 38 treespecies). Dominance of broadleaved trees other thanQuercusspp. was negatively correlated with basal area of Pinusspp. (P < 0.001). Soils of pine-dominated stands weremore compacted, less acidic, and less fertile (lower C.E.C., nitrogen, andorganic matter content). Numerous broadleaved trees may depend on anoak-dominated canopy to regenerate, and changes associated to pinelandsexpansion may compromise their long-term persistence. However, seedlings andsaplings of Quercus spp. were abundant in stands with bothan oak- or pine-dominated canopy. The results suggest that a plan forsustainable forest utilization in the study region, and in other similarpopulated tropical highlands, could take advantage of the abundant oakregeneration and coexistence with pines in the canopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alemán-Santillán T. 1989. Los sistemas de producción forestal y agrícola de roza. In: Parra-Vázquez M.R. (ed.), El subdesarrollo agrícola en Los Altos de Chiapas. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, pp. 83–151.

  2. Andersson C. 1991. Distribution of seedlings and saplings of Quercus robur in a grazed deciduous forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 279–282.

  3. Attiwill P.M. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63: 247–300.

  4. Batschelet E. 1979. Introduction to Mathematics for Life Scientists. Springer, Berlin.

  5. Binggeli P. 1996. A taxonomic, biogeographical and ecological overview of invasive woody plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 121–124.

  6. Bonfil C. and Soberón J. 2000. Quercus rugosa seedling dynamics in relation to its re-introduction in a disturbed Mexican land-scape. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 189–200.

  7. Bormann H.F. and Likens E.G. 1977. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer, New York.

  8. Breedlove D.E. 1981. Flora of Chiapas. Part 1: Introduction to the Flora of Chiapas. California Academy of Sciences, San Fran-cisco.

  9. Brender E.V. 1974. Impact of past land use on the Lower Piedmont forest. Journal of Forestry 72: 34–36.

  10. Cabrera García L., Mendoza Hernández P.E., Peña Flores V., Bonfil Sanders C. and Soberón Mainero J. 1998. Evaluación de una plantación de encinos (Quercus rugosa Née) en el Ajusco Me-dio, Distrito Federal. Agrociencia 32: 149–156.

  11. Camacho-Cruz A., González-Espinosa M., Wolf J.H.D. and De Jong B.H.J. 2000. Germination and survival of tree species in disturbed forests of the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 1309–1318.

  12. Carleton T.J., Maycock M.F., Arnup R. and Gordon A.M. 1996. In situ regeneration of Pinus strobus and P. resinosa in the Great Lakes forest communities of Canada. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 431–444.

  13. Cavelier J. and Tobler A. 1998. The effect of abandoned planta-tions of Pinus patula and Cupressus lusitanica on soils and regeneration of a tropical montane rain forest in Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 335–347.

  14. Chapin F.S., Vitousek P.M. and van Cleve K. 1986. The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. The American Naturalist 127: 48–58.

  15. Chapin F.S., Bloom A.J., Field C.B. and Waring R.H. 1987. Plant responses to multiple enviromental factors. BioScience 37: 49–57.

  16. Chazdon R.L., Colwell R.K. and Denslow J.S. 1999. Tropical Tree Richness and Resource-based Niches. Science Technical Comments (www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/285/5433/1459a).

  17. Connell J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.

  18. Connell J.H. and Slatyer R.O. 1977. Mechanisms of succesion in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist 111: 1119–1144.

  19. Christensen N.L. and Peet R.K. 1981. Secondary forest succession on the North Carolina Piedmont. In: West D.C., Shugart H.H. and Botkin D.B. (eds), Forest Succession. Springer, New York, pp. 230–245.

  20. De Jong B.H.J., Cairns M.A., Ramírez-Marcial N., Ochoa-Gaona S., Mendoza-Vega J., Haggerty P.K. et al. 1999. Land-use change and carbon flux between the 1970s and 1990s in the central highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Environmental Management 23: 373–385.

  21. Denslow J.S. 1980. Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under diferent disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46: 18–21.

  22. Denslow J.S. 1987. Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diver-sity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 431–451.

  23. Farjon A. and Styles B.T. 1997. Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph No.75. Published for Organization for Flora Neotropica by New York Botanical Garden, New York.

  24. Fisher L.D. and van Belle G. 1993. Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences. Wiley, New York.

  25. Fujisaka S., Escobar G. and Veneklaas E. 1998. Plant community diversity relative to human land uses in an Amazon forest colony. Biodiversity and Conservation 1: 41–57.

  26. García E. 1987. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Koeppen. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

  27. Glenn-Lewin D.C. and van der Maarel E. 1992. Patterns and pro-cesses of vegetation dynamics. In: Glenn-Lewin D.C., Peet R.K. and Veblen T.T. (eds), Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 11–59.

  28. González-Espinosa M., Quintana-Ascencio P.F., Ramírez-Marcial N. and Gaytán-Guzmán P. 1991. Secondary succession in dis-turbed Pinus-Quercus forests in the highlands of Chiapas México. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 351–360.

  29. González-Espinosa M., Ochoa-Gaona S., Ramírez-Marcial N. and Quintana-Ascencio P.F. 1995a. Current land-use trends and conservation of old-growth forest habitats in the highlands of Chiapas. México. In: Wilson M.M. and Sader S.S. (eds), Conservation of Neotropical Migratory Birds in México. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Orono, pp. 190–198.

  30. González-Espinosa M., Ramírez-Marcial N., Quintana-Ascencio P.F. and Martínez-Icó M. 1995b. La utilización de encinos y la conservación de la biodiversidad en Los Altos de Chiapas. Reporte Científico Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Número Especial 15: 183-197., Publication no. 727.

  31. González-Espinosa M., Ochoa-Gaona S., Ramírez-Marcial N. and Quintana-Ascencio P.F. 1997. Contexto vegetacional y florístico de la agricultura. In: Parra-Vázquez M.R. and Díaz-Hernández B.M. (eds), Los Altos de Chiapas: agricultura y crisis rural. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, pp. 85–117.

  32. Grubb P. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews 52: 107–145.

  33. Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natu-ral and managed forests of the Pacific northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913–934.

  34. Hill M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN. A FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Department of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca.

  35. Hobbs R.J. and Huenneke L.F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324–337.

  36. Hong S.-K., Nakagoshi N. and Kamada M. 1995. Human impacts on pine-dominated vegetation in rural landscapes in Korea and western Japan. Vegetatio 116: 161–172.

  37. Hubbell S.P., Foster R.B., O'Brien S.T., Harms K.E., Condit R., Wechsler B. et al. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 283: 554–557.

  38. Huston M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  39. INEGI 1984a. Carta topográfica, E15DG2 (San Cristóbal de Las Casas), escala 1:50,000. SPP/INEGI, México.

  40. INEGI 1984b. Carta de efectos climáticos regionales, E15-11 (Tux-tla Gutiérrez), escala 1:250,000. SPP/INEGI, México.

  41. INEGI 1985. Carta edafológica, E15-11 (Tuxtla Gutiérrez), escala 1:250,000. SPP/INEGI, México.

  42. Jardel E.J. 1991. Perturbaciones naturales y antropogénicas y su influencia en la dinámica sucesional de los bosques de Las Joyas, Sierra de Manantlán, Jalisco. Tiempos de Ciencia 22: 9–26.

  43. Kobe R.K. 1999. Tropical Tree Richness and Resource-based Niches. www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/285/5433/1459a.

  44. Kollmann J. and Schill H.-P. 1996. Spatial patterns of dispersal, seed predation and germination during colonization of abandoned grassland by Quercus petraea and Corylus avellana. Vegetatio 125: 193–205.

  45. Lavelle P., Blanchart E., Martin A., Martin S., Spain A., Toutain F. et al. 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25: 130–150.

  46. Leemans R. 1991. Canopy gaps and establishment patterns of spruce (Picea abies) in two old-growth coniferous forest in central Sweden. Vegetatio 93: 157–165.

  47. López-Barrera F. and González-Espinosa M. 2001. Influence of litter on emergence and early growth of Quercus rugosa: A laboratory study. New Forests 21: 59.

  48. Lugo A.E. 1995. Management of tropical biodiversity. Ecological Applications 5: 956–961.

  49. Lust N., Muys B. and Nachtergale L. 1998. Increase of biodiver-sity in homogeneous Scots pine stands by an ecologically diversified management. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 249–260.

  50. Miranda F. 1952. La vegetación de Chiapas. Vol. 1. Ediciones del Gobierno del Estado, Tuxtla Gutiérrez.

  51. Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York.

  52. Ochoa-Gaona S. and González-Espinosa M. 2000. Land use and deforestation in the highlands of Chiapas Mexico. Applied Geography 20: 17–42.

  53. Peet R.K. 1992. Comunity structure and ecosystem function. In: Glenn-Lewin D.C., Peet R.K. and Veblen T.T. (eds), Plant Suc-cession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 103–151.

  54. Pickett S.T.A. 1980. Non-equilibrium coexistence of plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107: 238–248.

  55. Pickett S.T.A. and White P.S. (eds) 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York.

  56. Plummer G.L. 1975. 18th century forests in Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Sciences 33: 1–19.

  57. Pyšek P. 1994. Pattern of species dominance and factors affecting community composition in areas deforested due to air pollution. Vegetatio 112: 45–56.

  58. Quintana-Ascencio P.F., González-Espinosa M. and Ramírez-Mar-cial N. 1992. Acorn removal, seedling survivorship, and seed-ling growth of Quercus crispipilis in successional forests of the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119: 6–18.

  59. Ramírez-Marcial N., González-Espinosa M. and García-Moya E. 1996. Establecimiento de Pinus spp. y Quercus spp. en mator-rales y pastizales de Los Altos de Chiapas, México. Agrocien-cia 30: 249–257.

  60. Ramírez-Marcial N., Ochoa-Gaona S., González-Espinosa M. and Quintana-Ascencio P.F. 1998. Análisis florístico y sucesional en la Estación Biológica Cerro Huitepec, Chiapas, México. Acta Botanica Mexicana 44: 59–85.

  61. Ramírez-Marcial N., González-Espinosa M. and Williams-Linera G. 2001. Anthropogenic disturbance and tree diversity in Mon-tane Rain Forests in Chiapas, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management (in press).

  62. Rejmánek M. and Richardson D.M. 1996. What attributes make some plants species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655–1661.

  63. Richardson D.M. and Bond W.J. 1991. Determinants of plant distribution: evidence from pine invasions. The American Naturalist 137: 639–668.

  64. Richardson D.M. 1998b. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conser-vation Biology 12: 18–26.

  65. Richardson D.M. (ed.) 1998b. Ecology and Biogeography of Pi-nus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  66. Romero-Nájera I. 2000. Estructura y condiciones microambientales en bosques perturbados de Los Altos de Chiapas, México. BSc, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

  67. Rzedowski J. and McVaugh R. La vegetación de Nueva Galicia. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 9: 1–123.

  68. Rzedowski J. 1978. Vegetación de México. Limusa, México.

  69. Schneider D.W. 1996. Effects of European settlement and land use on regional patterns of similarity among Chesapeake forests. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123: 223–239.

  70. Shaw M.W. 1968. Factors affecting the natural regeneration of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in north Wales. II. Acorn losses and germination under field conditions. Journal of Ecology 56: 647–660.

  71. Ter Braak C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.

  72. Ter Braak C.J.F. 1987. CANOCO - A FORTRAN Program for Ca-nonical Community Ordination by (Partial) (Detrended) (Canonical) Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis and Redundance Analysis. TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen.

  73. Trudgill S.T. 1988. Soil and Vegetation Systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  74. van Groenewoud H. 1992. The robustness of correspondence, detrended correspondence, and TWINSPAN analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 239–246.

  75. van Reewijk L.P. 1995. International Soil Reference and Information Centre Technical Papers 9. Procedures for Soil Analysis. ISRIC-FAO, Wageningen.

  76. Vázquez G., J A., Cuevas G.R., Cochrane T.S., Iltis H.H., Santana M. et al. 1995. Flora de Manantlán: plantas vasculares de la Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra de Manantlán, Jalisco-Colima, México. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 13. Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth.

  77. Vetaas O.R. 1997. The effect of canopy disturbance on species richness in central Himalayan oak forests. Plant Ecology 132: 29–38.

  78. Wagner P.L. 1962. Natural and artificial zonation in a vegetation cover: Chiapas, Mexico. Geographical Review 52: 253–274.

  79. White D.L., Haines B.L. and Boring L.R. 1988. Litter decomposition in southern Appalachian black locust and pine-hardwood stands: litter quality and nitrogen dynamics. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 54–63.

  80. Woods K.D. and Whittaker R.H. 1981. Canopy-under interaction and the internal dynamics of mature hardwood and hemlock-hardwood forests. In: West D.C., Shugart H.H. and Botkin D.B. (eds), Forest Succession. Springer, New York, pp. 305–323.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galindo-Jaimes, L., González-Espinosa, M., Quintana-Ascencio, P. et al. Tree composition and structure in disturbed stands with varying dominance by Pinus spp. in the highlands of Chiapas, México. Plant Ecology 162, 259–272 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020309004233

Download citation

  • Disturbance
  • Forest soils
  • Hardwoods
  • Litter
  • Quercus
  • Species richness