Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 197–219 | Cite as

Cross Comparison of Empirical Equations for Calculating Potential Evapotranspiration with Data from Switzerland

  • C.-Y. XuEmail author
  • V. P. Singh
Article

Abstract

Earlier studies (Singh and Xu, 1997; Xu and Singh, 2000, 2001) have evaluated and compared various popular empirical evapotranspiration equations that belonged to three categories:(1) mass-transfer based methods, (2) radiation based methods, and(3) temperature-based methods; and the best and worst equations of each category were determined for the study regions. In this study a cross comparison of the best or representative equation forms selected from each category was made. Five representativeempirical potential evapotranspiration equations selected from the three categories, namely: Hargreaves and Blaney-Criddle (temperature-based), Makkink and Priestley-Taylor (radiation-based) and Rohwer (mass-transfer-based) were evaluatedand compared with the Penman-Monteith equation using daily meteorological data from the Changins station in Switzerland.The calculations of the Penman-Monteith equation followed theprocedure recommended by FAO (Allen et al., 1998). Thecomparison was first made using the original constant valuesinvolved in each empirical equation and then made using therecalibrated constant values. The study showed that: (1) theoriginal constant values involved in each empirical equationworked quite well for the study region, except that the valueof α = 1.26 in Priestley-Taylor was found to be too high and therecalibration gave a value of α = 0.90 for the region.(2) Improvement was achieved for the Blaney-Criddle method by addinga transition period in determining the parameter k. (3) The differences of performance between the best equation forms selected from each category are smaller than the differences between different equations within each category as reportedin earlier studies (Xu and Singh, 2000, 2001). Further examinationof the performance resulted in the following rank of accuracy ascompared with the Penman-Monteith estimates: Priestley-Taylor andMakkink (Radiation-based), Hargreaves and Blaney-Criddle (temperature-based) and Rohwer (Mass-transfer).

mass-transfer-based potential evapotranspiration radiation-based Switzerland temperature-based 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abtew, W.: 1996, 'Evapotranspiration Measurement and Modeling for three Wetland Systems in South Florida', Water Resour. Bull. 32, 465–473.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Perrier, A. and Pereira, L. S.: 1994, 'An Update for the Definition of Reference Evaporation', ICID Bull. 43, 1–33.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Pereira, L. S. and Perrier, A.: 1994, 'An Update for the Calculation of Reference Evaporation', ICID Bull. 43, 35–92.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M.: 1998, Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainge Paper 56, FAO, 1998, ISBN 92-5-104219-5.Google Scholar
  5. Aslyng, H. C. and Hansen, S.: 1982, Water Balance and Crop Production Simulation. Model WATCROS for Local and Regional Application, Hydrotechnical Laboratory, The Royal Vet. and Agric. Univ., Copenhagen, 200 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Blad, B. L. and Rosenberg, N. J.: 1976, 'Evaluation of Resistance and Mass Transport Evapotranspiration Models Requiring Canopy Temperature Data', Agron. J. 68, 764–769.Google Scholar
  7. Blaney, H. F. and Criddle, W. D.: 1950, Determining Water Requirements in Irrigated Area from Climatological Irrigation Data, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Tech. Pap. No. 96, 48 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Brutsaert, W. and Yu, S. L.: 1968, 'Mass Transfer Aspects of Pan Evaporation', J. Appl. Meteorol. 7, 563–566.Google Scholar
  9. Conaway, J. and Van Bavel, C. H. M.: 1967, 'Evaporation from a Wet Soil Surface Calculated from Radiometrically Determined Surface Temperature', J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 650–655.Google Scholar
  10. Dalton, J.: 1802, 'Experimental Essays on the Constitution of Mixed Gases: On the Force of Steam or Vapor from Water or Other Liquids in Different Temperatures, Both in a Torricelli Vacuum and in Air; on Evaporation; and on Expansion of Gases by Heat', Manchester Literary Philosophical Society Mem. Proceedings 5, 536–602.Google Scholar
  11. Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W. O.: 1977, Crop Water Requirements, FAO, Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 24, 144 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Guitjens, J. C.: 1982, 'Models of Alfalfa Yield and Evapotranspiration', Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 108(IR3), pp. 212–222.Google Scholar
  13. Hamon, W. R.: 1961, 'Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration', J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 87, 107–120.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, S.: 1984, 'Estimation of Potential and Actual Evapotranspiration', Nordic Hydrology 15, 205–212.Google Scholar
  15. Harbeck Jr., G. E.: 1962, A Practical Field Technique for Measuring Reservoir Evaporation Utilizing Mass-transfer Theory, U.S. Geol. Surv., Paper 272-E, pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
  16. Hargreaves, G. H.: 1975, 'Moisture Availability and Crop Production', TRANSACTION of the ASAE 18, 980–984.Google Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, G. H. and Samni, Z. A.: 1982, 'Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration', Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 108, 223–230.Google Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, G. H. and Samni, Z. A.: 1985, Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature, TRANSACTION of the ASAE.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, M. E. and Haise, H. R.: 1963, 'Estimation of Evapotranspiration from Solar Radiation', Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, Proc. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 89, 15–41.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D. and Allen, R. G.: 1990, Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. Kellner, E.: 2001, 'Surface Energy Fluxes and Control of Evapotranspiration from a Swedish Sphagnum Mire', Agricult. Forest Meteorol. 110 101–123.Google Scholar
  22. Kharrufa, N. S.: 1985, 'Simplified Equation for Evapotranspiration in Arid Regions', Beiträge zur Hydrologie, Sonderheft 5.1, 39–47.Google Scholar
  23. Lafleur, P.-M., McCaughey, J. H., Joiner, D. W., Bartlett, P. A. and Jelinski, D. E.: 1997, 'Seasonal Trends in Energy, Water, and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes at a Northern Boreal Wetland', J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 29009–29020.Google Scholar
  24. Linacre, E. T.: 1977, 'A Simple Formula for Estimating Evaporation Rates in Various Climates, using Temperature Data Alone', Agricult. Meteorol. 18, 409–424.Google Scholar
  25. Makkink, G. F.: 1957, 'Testing the Penman Formula by Means of Lysimeters', J. Instit. Water Engineers 11, 277–288.Google Scholar
  26. McGuinness, J. L. and Bordne, E. F.: 1972, 'A Comparion of Lysimeter-derived Potential Evapotranspiration with Computed Values', Tech. Bull. 1452, 71 pp., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dept. of Agric., Washington, D. C., 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, A. F.: 1915, 'Computing Runoff from Rainfall and Other Physical Data', Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 79, 1055–155.Google Scholar
  28. Penman, H. L.: 1948, 'Natural Evaporation from Open Water, Bare Soil and Grass', Proc., Royal Soc., London 193, 120–145.Google Scholar
  29. Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: 1972, 'On the Assessment of the Surface heat Flux and Evaporation using Large-scale Parameters', Monthly Weather Review 100, 81–92.Google Scholar
  30. Pruitt, W. O. and Aston, M. J.: 1963, 'Atmospheric and Surface Factors Affecting Evapotranspiration', Final Report to USAEPG on Contract No. DA-36-039.SC-80334, Univ. of California-Davis, pp. 69–105.Google Scholar
  31. Ripple, C. D., Rubin, J. and Van Hylckama, T. E. A.: 1970, Estimating Steady-state Evaporation Rates from bare Soils under Conditions of High Water Table, U.S. Geol. Sur., Open-file Report Water Res. Div., Menlo Park, California, 62 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Rohwer, C.: 1931, 'Evaporation from Free Water Surface', USDA Tech. Null. 217, 1–96.Google Scholar
  33. Romanenko, V. A.: 1961, 'Computation of the Autumn Soil Moisture Using a Universal Relationship for a Large Area', Proceedings Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Research Institute, No. 3, Kiev.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, N. J., Blad, B. L. and Verma, S. B.: 1983, Evaporationand Evapotranspiration, Chapter 7 of the Book Microclimate - The Biological Environment, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 209–287.Google Scholar
  35. Singh, V. P.: 1989, Hydrologic Systems, Vol. II, Watershed Modelling, Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Thornthwaite, C. W.: 1948, 'An Approach Toward a Rational Classification of Climate', Geog. Review 38, 55–94.Google Scholar
  37. Singh, V. P. and Xu, C.-Y.: 1997, 'Evaluation and Generalization of 13 Equations for Determining Free Water Evaporation', Hydrol. Processes 11, 311–323.Google Scholar
  38. Turc, L.: 1961, 'Estimation of Irrigation Water Requirements, Potential Evapotranspiration: A Simple Climatic Formula Evolved Up to Date', Ann. Agronomy 12, 13–49.Google Scholar
  39. Xu, C.-Y. and Singh, V. P.: 1998, 'Dependence of Evaporation on Meteorological Variables at Different Time-scales and Intercomparison of Estimation Methods', Hydrolog. Processes 12, 429–442.Google Scholar
  40. Xu, C.-Y. and Singh, V. P.: 2000, 'Evaluation and Generalization of Radiation-based Methods for Calculating Evaporation', Hydrolog. Processes 14, 339–349.Google Scholar
  41. Xu, C.-Y. and Singh, V. P.: 2001, 'Evaluation and Generalization of Radiation-based Methods for Calculating Evaporation', Hydrolog. Processes 15, 305–319.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth Sciences, HydrologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A

Personalised recommendations