Sex Roles

, Volume 46, Issue 9–10, pp 279–293

Does Absence Make the Heart Grow Fonder? Work-Related Travel and Marital Satisfaction

  • Patricia V. Roehling
  • Marta Bultman
Article

Abstract

Using a sample of 961 dual-earner couples, the authors examined the relationship between work-related travel and marital satisfaction, using gender role attitudes and parental status as moderators. For women and men with children, the impact of travel is generally consistent with gender role congruence theory, which posits that marital satisfaction will be highest when gender role attitudes and gender role behaviors are congruent. Generally, when one holds traditional gender role attitudes, marital satisfaction is stable or enhanced when the husband travels, and is lower when the wife travels. Nontraditional parents are generally less happy if either member travels. The results were less predictable among couples without children in the home.

travel marital satisfaction gender role children 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arrighi, B. A., & Maume, D. J. (2000). Workplace subordination and men's avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 464-487.Google Scholar
  2. Bank, B. J., & Spencer, D. (1998, August). Effects of gender, race-ethnicity, high-school experiences, and ideology on commitments after Graduation. Paper presented at the Annual American Sociological Association Convention, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. American Psychologist, 56, 781-796.Google Scholar
  4. Beale, R. L. (1997). Multiple familial-worker role strain and psychological well being: Moderating effects of coping resources among Black American parents. In R. J. Taylor, J. S. Jackson, & L. M. Chatters (Eds.), Family life in Black America (pp. 132-145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, P., & Moen, P. (1998). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995-1007.Google Scholar
  6. Beutell, N. J., & Wittig-Berman, U. (1999). Predictors of work-family conflict and satisfaction with family, job, career, and life. Psychological Reports, 85, 893-903.Google Scholar
  7. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.Google Scholar
  8. Bianchi, S., & Spain, D. (1996). Women, work, and family in America. Populations Bulletin, 51, 1-48.Google Scholar
  9. Blair, S. L. (1998). Work roles, domestic roles, and marital quality: Perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Social Justice Research, 11, 313-335.Google Scholar
  10. Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 175-183.Google Scholar
  11. Ciscel, D. H., & Sharp, D. C. (1995). Household labor in hours by family type. Journal of Forensic Economics, 8, 115-123.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, P. N., & Bianchi, S. (1999, December). Marriage, children, and women's employment: What do we know? Monthly Labor Review, pp. 22-31.Google Scholar
  13. Correll, S. J., & Bourg, C. (1999, August). Trends in gender role attitudes, 1976–1997: The continued myth of separate worlds. Paper presented at the Annual American Sociological Association Convention, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Crouter, A. C., Bumpus, M. F., Maguire, M. C., & McHale, S. M. (1999). Linking parents' work pressure and adolescents' well-being: Insights into dynamics in dual-earner families. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1453-1461.Google Scholar
  15. Dempsey, K. C. (1998). Increasing the workload of the overloaded housewife. Journal of Family Studies, 4, 3-20.Google Scholar
  16. Desai, S., & Waite, L. J. (1991). Women's employment during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review, 56, 551-566.Google Scholar
  17. Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Lee, C. (1994). Work-family conflict: A comparison by gender, family type, and perceived control. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 449-466.Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, C. (1998). Business on the road. American Demographics, 20, 44-47.Google Scholar
  19. Gershuny, J. (1999). Sexual divisions and the distribution of work in the household. In G. Dench (Ed.), Rewriting the sexual contract (pp. 141-152). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffman, L. W. (1989). Effects of maternal employment in the two-parent family. American Psychologist, 44, 283-292.Google Scholar
  21. Hughes, D., & Galinsky, E. (1994). Work experiences and marital interactions: Elaborating the complexity of work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 423-438.Google Scholar
  22. Hughes, D., Galinsky, E., & Morris, A. (1992). The effects of job characteristics on marital quality: Specifying linking mechanisms. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 31-42.Google Scholar
  23. Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931-947.Google Scholar
  24. Kulik, L. (2000). Intrafamiliar congruence in gender-role ideology: Husband-wife versus parent-offspring. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 91-106.Google Scholar
  25. Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2000). Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics, 7, 689-710.Google Scholar
  26. Markham, W. T., Bonjean, C. M., & Corder, J. (1986). Gender, out-of-town travel, and occupational advancement. Descriptive Research Reports, 70, 156-160.Google Scholar
  27. Moen, P., Roehling, P. V., Sweet, S. S., Lee, S., Harris-Abbot, D., O'Brien, L., et al. (in press). Appendix A. Methodological notes on the Cornell Couples and Careers Study: Overview of the study. In P. Moen (Ed.) It's About Time: The Cornell Couples and Careers Study. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Oddou, G., Mendenhall, M. E., & Ritchie, B. (2000). Leveraging travel as a tool for global leadership development. Human Resource Management, 39, 159-172.Google Scholar
  29. Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1993). Personal portrait: The life-style of the woman manager. In E. A. Fagenson (Ed.), Women in management (pp. 186-211). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348-364.Google Scholar
  31. Presser, H., & Hermsen, J. (1996). Gender differences in the determinants of work-related overnight travel among employed Americans. Work and Occupations, 23, 87-115.Google Scholar
  32. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender and the division of labor. Gender and Society, 11, 747-772.Google Scholar
  33. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 6, 147-159.Google Scholar
  34. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.Google Scholar
  35. Vannoy, D., & Philliber, W. W. (1992). Wife's employment and quality of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 387-398.Google Scholar
  36. Wethington, E. (2000). Contagion of stress. Advances in Group Processes, 17, 229-253.Google Scholar
  37. Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M. R., & Strother, K. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 577-594.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia V. Roehling
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marta Bultman
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentHope CollegeHolland
  2. 2.Cornell Employment and Family Careers Institute, Blec MVR HallCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations