Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 13, Issue 8, pp 753–758 | Cite as

Risk of breast cancer in women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: preliminary results (United States)

  • Julie R. Palmer
  • Elizabeth E. Hatch
  • Carol L. Rosenberg
  • Patricia Hartge
  • Raymond H. Kaufman
  • Linda Titus-Ernstoff
  • Kenneth L. Noller
  • Arthur L. Herbst
  • R. Sowmya Rao
  • Rebecca Troisi
  • Theodore Colton
  • Robert N. Hoover


BACKGROUND: A synthetic estrogen, diethylstilbestrol (DES), was widely prescribed to pregnant women during the 1950s and 1960s but was later discovered to be associated with an increased risk of clear-cell carcinoma of the vagina and cervix in female offspring. DES has not been linked to other cancers in female offspring, but studies of other prenatal factors such as twin gestation and pre-eclampsia have indicated that in-utero estrogen levels may influence breast cancer risk. We evaluated the relation of in-utero DES exposure to the risk of adult breast cancer.

METHODS: A cohort of 4821 exposed women and 2095 unexposed women, most of whom were first identified in the mid-1970s, were followed by mailed questionnaires for an average of 19 years. Reported cancer outcomes were validated by medical record review. Breast cancer incidence in DES-exposed daughters was compared with cancer incidence in unexposed daughters with use of Poisson regression analysis, adjusting for year of birth, age at menarche, age at first birth, and number of births.

FINDINGS: The rate ratio for incidence of invasive breast cancer in exposed versus unexposed women was 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7–2.6). DES exposure was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in women under 40 years, but among women aged 40 and older the rate ratio was 2.5 (95% CI = 1.0–6.3). The rate ratio for the association of DES exposure with estrogen receptor-positive tumors was 1.9 (95% CI = 0.8–4.5).

INTERPRETATION: While not statistically significant, the overall 40% excess risk, arising exclusively from the subset of estrogen receptor-positive cases, raises a concern calling for continued investigation.

breast carcinoma diethylstilbestrol hormones prenatal factors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Trichopoulos D (1990) Does breast cancer originate in utero? Lancet 335: 939–940.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Potischman N, Troisi R (1999) In-utero andearly life exposures in relation to risk of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 10: 561–573.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ekbom A, Hsieh C-C, Lipworth L, Adami H-O, Trichopoulos D (1997) Intrauterine environment andbreast cancer risk in women: a population-basedstud y. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 71–76.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hsieh C-C, Lan S-J, Ekbom A, Petridou E, Adami H-O, Trichopoulos D (1992) Twin membership andbreast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 136: 1321–1326.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weiss HA, Potischman NA, Brinton LA, et al. (1997) Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for breast cancer in young women. Epidemiology 8: 181–187.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ekbom A, Trichopoulos D, Adami H-O, Hsieh C-C, Lan S-J (1992) Evidence of prenatal influences on breast cancer risk. Lancet 340: 1015–1018.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas HV, Murphy MF, Key TJ, Fentiman IS, Allen DS, Kinlen LJ (1998) Pregnancy andmenstrual hormone levels in mothers of twins comparedto mothers of singletons. Ann Hum Biol 25: 69–75.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gargoff L, Seppala M (1976) Toxemia of pregnancy: assessment of fetal distress by urinary estriol and circulating human placental lactogen andalpha-fetop rotein levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126: 1027–1033.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noller KL, Fish CR (1974) Diethylstilbestrol usage: its interesting past, important present, andquestion able future. Med Clin N Am 58: 739–810.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC (1971) Adenocarcinoma of the vagina: association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. N Engl J Med 284: 878–881.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hatch EE, Palmer JR, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al. (1998) Cancer risk in women exposedto diethylstilbestrol in utero. JAMA 280: 630–634.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Labarthe D, Adam E, Noller KL, et al. (1978) Design and preliminary observations of the National Cooperative Diethylstibestrol Adenosis (DESAD) Project. Obstet Gynecol 51: 453–458.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bibbo M, Gill WB, Azizi F, et al. (1977) Follow-up study of male andfemale offspring of DES-exposed mothers. Obstet Gynecol 49: 1–8.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenberg ER, Barnes AB, Resseguie L, et al. (1984) Breast cancer in mothers given diethylstilbestrol in pregnancy. N Engl JMed 311: 1393–1398.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, II: Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. IARC Scientific Publication 88. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1987.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nelson W (1972) Theory andapplicatio n of hazard plotting for censoredfailure data. Technometrics 14: 945–965.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLachlan JA. The role of experimental model systems in the study of DES-associated malignancy. NIH Workshop Long-Term Effects of Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol (DES) 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Innes K, Byers T, Schymura M (2000) Birth characteristics and risk for breast cancer in very young women. Am J Epidemiol 52: 1121–1128.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janerich DT, Hayden CL, Thompson WD, et al. (1989) Epidemiologic evidence of perinatal influence in the etiology of adult cancers. J Clin Epidemiol 42: 151–157.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Y, Cupples LA, Rosenberg L, et al. (1995) Parental ages at birth in relation to a daughter's risk of breast cancer among female participants in the Framingham Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 6: 23–29.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rothman KJ, MacMahon B, Lin TM, et al. (1980) Maternal age andbirth rank of women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 65: 719–722.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson WD, Janerich DT (1990) Maternal age at birth andrisk of breast cancer in daughters. Epidemiology 1: 101–106.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanderson M, Williams M, Malone K, et al. (1996) Perinatal factors andrisk of breast cancer. Epidemiology 7: 34–37.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michels K, Trichopoulos D, Robins J, et al. (1996) Birthweight as a risk factor for breast cancer. Lancet 348: 1542–1546.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Braun MM, Ahlbom A, Floderus B, Brinton LA, Hoover RN (1995) Effect of twinship on incidence of cancer of the testis, breast, andother sites (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 6: 519–524.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Le Marchand L, Kolonel L, Myers B, et al. (1988) Birth characteristics of premenopausal women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 57: 437–439.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    NCI adopts New Mammography Screening Guidelines for Women (1997) J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 538–539.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie R. Palmer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elizabeth E. Hatch
    • 3
  • Carol L. Rosenberg
    • 4
  • Patricia Hartge
    • 5
  • Raymond H. Kaufman
    • 6
  • Linda Titus-Ernstoff
    • 7
  • Kenneth L. Noller
    • 8
  • Arthur L. Herbst
    • 9
  • R. Sowmya Rao
    • 1
  • Rebecca Troisi
    • 5
  • Theodore Colton
    • 3
  • Robert N. Hoover
    • 5
  1. 1.Slone Epidemiology UnitBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  2. 2.Slone Epidemiology UnitBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  4. 4.Section of Hematology and OncologyBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  5. 5.Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  6. 6.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  7. 7.Norris Cotton Cancer CenterDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonUSA
  8. 8.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyNew England Medical CenterBostonUSA
  9. 9.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations