Landscape Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 263–279 | Cite as

Plant strategies and agricultural landscapes: survival in spatially and temporally fragmented habitat

  • W. Geertsema
  • P. Opdam
  • M.J. Kropff
Article

Abstract

In agricultural landscapes many plant species are limited to the network of landscape elements that are not used for agricultural production. This habitat is fragmented in space and time due to anthropogenic, biotic and abiotic factors. Therefore, plant populations are spatially sub-divided and their persistence might be dependent on the spatial dynamics in the network of local populations. Dispersal characteristics and seed bank persistence are main determinants of colonization ability which in turn is a key determinant of metapopulation viability. We propose a conceptual model that relates plant population dynamics to habitat quality, configuration and dynamics. In this model, the habitat is arranged as a network of suitable and unsuitable patches,and the distribution of the patches is assumed to be dynamic in time. Based on dispersal and seed bank characteristics four plant strategies are distinguished:species having either long (> 100 m) or short (< 100m) distance dispersal and either a long (> 5 yr)or short (< 5 yr) term persistent seed bank. We expect that species with contrasting strategies have different survival probabilities in landscapes with contrasting habitat arrangement in space and time. We found few empirical studies for testing the hypotheses based on the model. Therefore the relation between landscapes and plant survival needs to be further explored,especially the quantitative aspects. We propose an iterative process of empirical and modelling research to determine this relation and to define management options for multifunctional farms in which biodiversity is one of the land use aims.

Biodiversity Conceptual model Dispersal Landscape planning Metapopulation Seed bank 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonovics J., Thrall P., Jarosz A. and Stratton D. 1994. Ecological genetics of metapopulations: the Silene-Ustilago plantpathogen system. In: Real L.A. (ed.), Ecological genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, pp. 146-170.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker J.P. and De Vries Y. 1988. Seed dispersal by hay-making machines and large herbivores. De Levende Natuur 89: 173-176.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker J.P. and Berendse F. 1999. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 63-68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker J.P., Poschlod P., Strykstra R.J., Bekker R.M. and Thompson K. 1996. Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 461-490.Google Scholar
  5. Percelen in Nederland. Veranderingen in de percelering tussen 1900 en nu Barends S. 1989..Google Scholar
  6. Baudry J. and Burel F. 1997. Agricultural landscape dynamics: implications for species movements. In: Cooper A. and Power J. (eds), Species dispersal and land use processes. Proceedings IALE UK conference 1997., pp. 3-10.Google Scholar
  7. Baudry J. and Tatoni T. 1993. Changes in landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in Provence, France. Landscape and Urban Planning 24: 153-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bekker R.M. 1998. The ecology of soil seed banks in grassland ecosystems. PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
  9. Boatman N. (ed.) 1994. Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, Monograph No 58.Google Scholar
  10. Brandt J., Tress B. and Tress G. 2000. Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary approaches to landscape research and management. In: Conference material for the conference on “multifunctional landscapes”. Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
  11. Bulle B., Van Groenendael J. and Jurgens C. 1994. Helophytes in ‘het Wageningse Binnenveld’ Their distribution related to their dispersal characteristics. Landschap 11: 19-28.Google Scholar
  12. Cain M.L., Milligan B.G. and Strand A.E. 2000. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany 87: 1217-1227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. C.B.S. (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek) 1993. Botanisch Basis Register., Voorburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Danvind M. and Nilsson C. 1997. Seed floating ability of alpine plants along a northern Swedish river. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 271-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deffontaines J.P., Thenail C. and Baudry J. 1995. Agricultural systems and landscape patterns: how can we build a relationship? Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 3-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Snoo G.R. and Van der Poll R.J. 1999. Effect of herbicide drift on adjacent boundary vegetation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73: 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dzwonko Z. 1993. Relation between the floristic composition of isolated young woods and their proximity to ancient woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 693-698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksson O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258.Google Scholar
  19. Falinska K. 1999. Seed bank dynamics in abandoned meadows during a 20-year period in the Bialowieza National Park. Journal of Ecology 87: 461-475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer M. and Stöcklin J. 1997. Local extinctions of plants in remnants of extensively used calcareous grasslands 1950-1985. Conservation Biology 11: 727-737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer S.F., Poschlod P. and Beinlich B. 1996. Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1206-1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frank K. and Wissel C. 1998. Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival-from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management. Landscape Ecology 13: 363-379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fröbrog H. and Eriksson O. 1997. Local colonization and extinction of field layer plants in a deciduous forest and their dependence upon life history features. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 395-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fry G.L.A. 1994. The role of field margins in the landscape. In: Boatman N. (ed.), Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, pp. 31-40.Google Scholar
  25. Geertsema W. and Sprangers J.T.C.M. Plant distribution patterns related to species characteristics and spatial and temporal habitat heterogeneity in a network of ditch banks. Plant Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Grashof-Bokdam C.J. 1997. Forest species in an agricultural landscape in the Netherlands: effects of habitat fragmentation. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 21-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grashof-Bokdam C.J. and Geertsema W. 1998. The effect of isolation and history on colonization patterns of plant species in secondary woodland. Journal of Biogeography 25: 837-846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grashof-Bokdam C.J., Jansen J. and Smulders M.J.M. 1998. Dispersal patterns of Lonicera periclymenum determined by genetic analysis. Molecular Ecology 7: 165-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grime J.P. and Hillier S.H. 1992. The contribution of seedling regeneration to the structure and dynamics of plant communities and larger units of landscape. In: Fenner M. (ed.), Seeds, the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallington, UK, pp. 349-364.Google Scholar
  30. Hanski I. 1985. Single-species dynamics may contribute to longterm rarity and commonness. Ecology 66: 335-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison S., Maron J. and Huxel G. 2000. Regional turnover and fluctuation in populations of five plants confined to serpentine seeps. Conservation Biology 14: 769-779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey C.A. 2000. Windbreaks enhance seed dispersal into agricultural landscapes in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Ecological Applications 10: 155-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haughton A.J., Wilcox A., Chaney K., Cooper S.E. and Boatman N.D. 1998. Spray drift into field margins: the effect of width of buffer strip and plant species on the interception of spray drift. In: The 1998 Brighton Conference-Pests and Diseases., pp. 285-290.Google Scholar
  34. Hodgson J.G., Grime J.P., Hunt R. and Thompson K. 1995. The electronic comparative plant ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Horlings I. 1996. Duurzaam boeren met beleid: innovatie groepen in de landbouw. PhD Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  36. Howe H.F. and Smallwood J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 201-228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes L., Dunlop M., French K., Leishman M.R., Rice B., Rodgerson L. et al. 1994. Predicting dispersal spectra: a minimal set of hypotheses based on plant attributes. Journal of Ecology 82: 933-950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Husband B.C. and Barrett S.C.H. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. Journal of Ecology 84: 461-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Husband B.C. and Barrett S.C.H. 1998. Spatial and temporal variation in population size of Eichhornia paniculata in ephemeral habitats: implications for metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Ecology 86: 1021-1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Joenje W. and Kleijn D. 1994. Plant distribution across arable field ecotones in the Netherlands. In: Boatman N. (ed.), Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, pp. 323-328.Google Scholar
  41. Kleijn D., Joenje W. and Kropff J.M. 1997. Patterns in species composition of arable field boundary vegetation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 46: 175-192.Google Scholar
  42. Kleijn D., Joenje W., Le Coeur D. and Marshall E.J.P. 1998. Similarities in vegetation development of newly established herbaceous strips along contrasting European field boundaries. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 68: 13-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kleijn D. and Verbeek M. 2000. Factors affecting the species composition of arable field boundary vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 256-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lamont B.B. and Klinkhamer P.G.L. 1993. Population size and viability. Nature 362: 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lavorel S., Touzard B., Lebreton J.-D. and Clément B. 1998. Identifying functional groups for response to disturbance in an abandoned pasture. Acta Oecologia 19: 227-240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Le Coeur D., Baudry J. and Burel F. 1997. Field margins plant assemblages: variation partitioning between local and landscape factors. Landscape and Urban Planning 37: 57-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levins R. 1970. Extinctions. Some mathematical questions in biology. In: Gerstenhaber R. (ed.), Lectures on mathematics in life sciences 2. The American Mathematical Society Providence, RI, pp. 77-107.Google Scholar
  48. Marshall E.J.P. 1989. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 247-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall E.J.P. and Arnold G.M. 1995. Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 205-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLaughlin A. and Mineau P. 1995. The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 55: 201-212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Melman Th.C.P., Clausman P.H.M.A. and Van Strien A.J. 1988. Ditch banks in the western Netherlands as connectivity structure. In: Schreiber K.-F. (ed.), Connectivity in Landscape Ecology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of IALE. Munstersche Geografische Arbeiten 29, Munster, Germany, pp. 157-161.Google Scholar
  52. Merriam G. 1988. Landscape dynamics in farmland. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3: 16-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Middleton J. and Merriam G. 1983. Distribution of woodland species in farmland woods. Journal of Applied Ecology 20: 625-644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moonen A.C. and Marshall E.J.P. 2001. The influence of sown margin strips, management and boundary structure on herbaceous field margin vegetation in two neighbouring farms in southern England. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86: 187-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mountford J.O., Parish T. and Sparks T.H. 1994. The flora of field margins in relation to land use and boundary features. In: Boatman N. (ed.), Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, pp. 105-110.Google Scholar
  56. Nip-Van der Voort J., Hengeveld R. and Haeck J. 1979. Immigration rates of plant species in three Dutch polders. Journal of Biogeography 6: 301-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Noble I.R. and Gitay H. 1996. A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 329-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Opdam P. 1990. Dispersal in fragmented populations: the key to survival. In: Bunce R.G.H. and Howard D.C. (eds), Species dispersal in agricultural habitats. Belhaven Press, London, UK, pp. 1-17.Google Scholar
  59. Opdam P., Grashof C. and Van Wingerden W. 2000. Groene dooradering, een ruimtelijk concept voor functiecombinaties in het agrarisch landschap. Landschap 17: 45-51.Google Scholar
  60. Opdam P. Assessing the conservation potential of habitat networks. In: Gutzwiller K.J. (ed.), Concepts and application of landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA (in press).Google Scholar
  61. Opdam P., Vos C. and Foppen R. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning. Landscape Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  62. Ouborg N.J. 1993. Isolation, population size and extinction: the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine-system. Oikos 66: 298-308.Google Scholar
  63. Ouborg N.J., Piquot Y. and Van Groenendael J.M. 1999. Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. Journal of Ecology 87: 551-568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parr T.W. and Way J.M. 1988. Management of roadside vegetation: the long-term effects of cutting. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 1073-1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Prins A.H., Dijkstra G.A. and Bekker R.M. 1998. Feasibility of target communities in a Dutch brook valley system. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47: 71-88.Google Scholar
  66. Poschlod P. and Bonn S. 1998. Changing dispersal processes in the central European landscape since the last ice age: an explanation for the actual decrease of plant species richness in different habitats? Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47: 27-44.Google Scholar
  67. Quintana-Ascencio P.F. and Menges E.S. 1996. Inferring metapopulation dynamics from patch-level incidence of Florida scrub plants. Conservation Biology 10: 1210-1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Richards C.M. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. American Naturalist 155: 383-394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarlöv Herlin I.L. and Fry G.L.A. 2000. Dispersal of woody plants in forest edges and hedgerows in a Southern Swedish agricultural area: the role of site and landscape structure. Landscape Ecology 18: 229-242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Strykstra R.J., Bekker R.M. and Verweij G.L. 1996. Establishment of Rhinanthus angustifolius in a successional hayfield after seed dispersal by mowing machinery. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 557-562.Google Scholar
  71. Ter Heerdt G.N.J., Schutter A. and Bakker J.P. 1999. The effect of water supply on seed-bank analysis using the seedling-emergence method. Functional Ecology 13: 428-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thompson K., Bakker J.P. and Bekker R.M. 1997. Soil seed banks of NW Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  73. Tilman D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78: 81-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Valverde T. and Silvertown J. 1997. A metapopulation model for Primula veris, a temperate forest understorey herb. Journal of Ecology 85: 193-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van der Meijden E., Klinkhamer P.G.L., De Jong T.J. and Van Wijk C.A.M. 1992. Metapopulation dynamics of biennial plants: how to exploit temporary habitats. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 41: 249-270.Google Scholar
  76. van der Pijl L. 1982. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  77. van Dorp D., Van den Hoek W.P.M. and Daleboudt C. 1996. Seed dispersal capacity of six perennial grassland species measured in a windtunnel at varying wind speed and height. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1956-1963.Google Scholar
  78. van Dorp D. and Van Oeveren H. 1996. Dynamic distribution and regenerative strategies of ten perennial grassland species in a Dutch agricultural landscape. Seed dispersal in agricultural habitats and the restoration of species-rich meadows. PhD Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  79. van Groenendael J., Ehrlén J. and Svensson B.M. 2000. Dispersal and persistence: population processes and community dynamics. Folia Geobotanica 35: 107-114.Google Scholar
  80. van Strien A.J., Van der Linden J., Melman Th.C.P. and Noordervliet M.A.W. 1989. Factors affecting the vegetation of ditch banks in peat areas in the Western Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 989-1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Verboom J., Metz J.A.J. and Meelis E. 1993. Metapopulation models for impact assessment of fragmentation. In: Vos C. and Opdam P. (eds), Landscape ecology of a stressed environment. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 172-191.Google Scholar
  82. Vos C.C., Verboom J., Opdam P.F.M. and Ter Braak C.J.F. 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. American Naturalist 157: 24-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Willson M.F. 1993. Dispersal mode, seed shadows and colonization patterns. Vegetatio 107/108: 261-280.Google Scholar
  84. Willson M.F., Rice B.L. and Westoby M. 1990. Seed dispersal spectra: a comparison of temperate plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 547-562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Geertsema
    • 1
  • P. Opdam
    • 1
  • M.J. Kropff
    • 2
  1. 1.ALTERRA Research InstituteWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Plant Sciences, Crop and Weed Ecology GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations