Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 419–428 | Cite as

Relationship of the Family Environment to Children's Involvement in Bully/Victim Problems at School

  • V. Stevens
  • I. De Bourdeaudhuij
  • P. Van Oost
Article

Abstract

Previous studies regarding the relationship of the family environment to children's involvement in bully/victim problems at school primarily focused on children's perceptions of family dimensions. No studies were known using data from multiple reporters within 1 family (parents and children) on family characteristics of bully/victim problems. The aim of this study was to investigate differences between families of victims, bullies, bully/victims, and noninvolved children on family functioning, child-rearing practices, and problem-solving strategies in hypothetical conflict situations and perception differences between children and their parents on those dimensions. The findings revealed important perception differences between children and their parents, with parents holding up a more positive picture of their family. Important differences between families of bullies, victims, and bully/victims were documented looking at the family functioning and parent–child interactions from the perspective of the children. In contrast, almost no differences between the groups were observed if parents' reports were considered. Discussion leads to suggestions for further antibullying interventions at the school.

bullying behavior victimization family environment health promotion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barrett, P. M., Rapee, R. M., Dadds, M. M., and Ryan, S. M. (1996). Family enhancement of cognitive style in anxious and aggressive children. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 24: 187–203.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., and Binney, V. (1992). Cohesion and power in the families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. J. Fam. Ther. 14: 371–387.Google Scholar
  3. Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., and Binney, V. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims and bully/victims in middle childhood. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 11: 215–232.Google Scholar
  4. Canary, D., Cupach, S., and Messman, L. (1995). Relationships Conflict. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, R., Felix, M., and Brownell, K. (1989). The role of parents and older peers in school-based cardiovascular prevention programs: Implications for program development. Health Educ. Q. 16: 245–253.Google Scholar
  6. De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (1997). Perceived family members' influence on introducing healthy food into the family. Health Educ. Res. 12(1): 77–90.Google Scholar
  7. De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (1998). Family members' influence on decision making about food: Differences in perception and relationship with healthy eating. Am. J. Health Promot. 13(2): 73–81.Google Scholar
  8. De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (2000). Relative contribution of general family characteristics, diet specific family variables and personal diet determinants to the prediction of healthy eating in families. Psychol. Health 15: 751–770.Google Scholar
  9. Dishion. T. J., and McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 1: 61–75.Google Scholar
  10. Gerris, J. R. M., Vermulst, A. A., Van Boxtel, D. A. A. M., Janssens, J. M. A. M., Van Zutphen, R. A. H., and Felling, A. J. A. (1993). Parenting in Dutch Families, a Representative Description of Dutch Family Life in Terms of Validated Concepts Representing Characteristics of Parents, Children, the Family as a System and Parental Socio-Cultural Value Orientations. Institute of Family Studies, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Hartos, J., and Power, T. (2000). Association between mother and adolescent reports for assessing relations between parent–adolescent communication and adolescent adjustment. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 441–450.Google Scholar
  12. Henderson, A. H. (1981). Social Power: Social Psychological Models and Theories. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Jansma, J., and de Coole, M. (1996). Gezinsklimaatschaal II. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.Google Scholar
  14. Kazdin, A. E. (1996). Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. In Developmental Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry (2nd edn., Vol. 9). Sage, London.Google Scholar
  15. Langhinrichsen, J., Lichtenstein, E., Seeley, J., and Hops, H. (1990). Parent–adolescent congruence of adolescent substance use. J. Youth Adolesc. 19: 623–635.Google Scholar
  16. Liebrand, J., Van Ijzendoorn, H., and Van Lieshout, C. F. M. (1991). Klasgenoten Relatie Vragenlijst. Vakgroep Ontwikkelingspsychologie, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  17. Loeber, R., and Farrington, D. P. (1998). Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  18. Masselam, V., Marcus, R., and Stunkard, C. (1990). Parent–adolescent communication, family functioning, and school performance. Adolescence 25: 725–737.Google Scholar
  19. Mooij, T. (1998). Pupil–class determinants of aggressive and victim behaviour in pupils. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 373–385.Google Scholar
  20. Moos, R. (1975). Evaluating Correctional and Community Settings. Wiley-Interscience, New York, p. 377.Google Scholar
  21. Noller, P. (1994). Relationships with parents in adolescence: Process and outcome. In Montemayor, R., Adams, G., and Gullotta, T. (eds.), Personal Relationships During Adolescence. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  22. Noller, P., and Callan, V. (1986). Adolescent and parent perceptions of family cohesion and adaptability. J. Adolesc. 9: 97–106.Google Scholar
  23. Noller, P., Seth-Smith, M., Bouma, R., and Schweitzer, R. (1992). Parent and adolescent perceptions of family functioning: A comparison of clinic and non-clinic families. J. Adolesc. 15: 101–114.Google Scholar
  24. Ohannessian, C., Lerner, R., Lerner, J., and Voneye, A. (1996). Discrepancies in adolescents' and parents' perceptions of family functioning and adolescent emotional adjustment. J. Early Adolesc. 15:(4), 490–516.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, R., Oaks, I. N., and Hoover, J. H. (1994). Family issues and interventions in bully and victim relationships. Sch. Counselor 41: 199–202.Google Scholar
  26. Olweus, D. (1980). Familial and temperamental determinants of aggressive behavior in adolescent boys: A causal analysis. Dev. Psychol. 16: 644–660.Google Scholar
  27. Olweus, D. (1984). Aggressors and their victims: Bullying at school. In Frude, N., and Gault, H. (eds.), Disruptive Behavior in Schools. Wiley, New York, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
  28. Olweus, D. (1989). Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students. Department of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  29. Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In Peters, R. DeV., McMahon, R. J., and Quinsey, V. L. (eds.), Aggression and Violence Throughout The Life Span. Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 100–125.Google Scholar
  30. Olweus, D., and Alsaker, F. D. (1991). Assessing change in a cohort-longitudinal study with hierarchical data. In Magnusson, D., Bergman, L. R., Rudinger, G., and Trestad, B. (eds.), Problems and Methods in Longitudinal Research: Stability and Change. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
  31. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., and Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial Boys. Castalia, Oregon.Google Scholar
  32. Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Ziegler, S., and Charach, A. (1994). An evaluation of an antibullying intervention in Toronto schools. Can. J. Commun. Ment. Health 13: 95–110.Google Scholar
  33. Rican, P., Klicperova, M., and Koucka, T. (1993). Families of bullies and their victims: A children's view. Studia Psychologica 35: 261–266.Google Scholar
  34. Rigby, K. (1993). School children's perceptions of their families and parents as a function of peer relations. J. Genet. Psychol. 154: 501–513.Google Scholar
  35. Rigby, K. (1994). Psychosocial functioning in families of Australian adolescent schoolchildren involved in bully/victim problems. J. Fam. Ther. 16: 173–187.Google Scholar
  36. Rigby, K., and Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian children and implications for psychological wellbeing. J. Soc. Psychol. 133: 33–42.Google Scholar
  37. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., and Bates, J. E. (1997). The early socialization of aggressive victims of bullying. Child Dev. 68: 665–675.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, P. K., Bowers, L., Binney, V., and Cowie, H. (1993). Relationships of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. In Duck, S. (ed.), Learning About Relationships, Understanding Relationship Processes Series Sage, London, pp. 184–212.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, P. K., and Sharp, S. (1994). School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  40. Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti-bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70: 195–210.Google Scholar
  41. Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (2001). Anti-bullying interventions at school: Aspects of programme adaptation and critical issues for further programme development. Health Promot. Int. 16: 155–167.Google Scholar
  42. Stevens, V., and Van Oost, P. (1994). Pesten op School: een actieprogramma. Garant Uitgevers, Kessel-Lo.Google Scholar
  43. Stoff, D. M., Breiling, J., and Maser, J.D. (1997). Handbook of Antisocial Behavior. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Tashakkori, A., Thompson, V. D., and Simonian, L. (1989). Adolescents' attributions of parental power: A re-examination of the “theory of resources in cultural context.” Int. J. Psychol. 24: 73–96.Google Scholar
  45. Welsh, D., Galliher, R., and Powers, S. (1998). Divergent realities and perceived inequalities: Adolescents', mothers', and observers' perceptions of family interactions and adolescent psychological functioning. J. Adolesc. Res. 13(4): 377–402.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, C., Eng, A., Botvin, G., Hill, P., and Wynder, E. (1979).Validation of students' self-reported cigarette smoking status with plasma cotinine levels. Am. J. Public Health 89: 1272–1274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Stevens
    • 1
  • I. De Bourdeaudhuij
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. Van Oost
    • 4
  1. 1.Flemish Institute of Health PromotionBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Movement and Sport SciencesGhent UniversityBelgium
  3. 3.Faculty of Psychology, Research Group Health and BehaviorBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Behavior Therapy and Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations