Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 341–367

The persistence of the R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright controversy

  • Robert A. Skipper
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1020178411042

Cite this article as:
Skipper, R.A. Biology & Philosophy (2002) 17: 341. doi:10.1023/A:1020178411042

Abstract

This paper considers recent heated debates led by Jerry A. Coyne andMichael J. Wade on issues stemming from the 1929–1962 R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wrightcontroversy in population genetics. William B. Provine once remarked that theFisher-Wright controversy is central, fundamental, and very influential.Indeed,it is also persistent. The argumentative structure of therecent (1997–2000) debates is analyzed with the aim of eliminating a logicalconflict in them, viz., that the two “sides” in the debates havedifferent aims and that, as such, they are talking past each other. Given aphilosophical analysis of the argumentative structure of the debates,suggestions supportive of Wade's work on the debate are made that areaimed, modestly, at putting the persistent Fisher-Wright controversy on thecourse to resolution.

Coyne Fisher Large Population Size Theory Population genetics Shifting Balance Theory Wade Wright 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Skipper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnati

Personalised recommendations