Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 205–233 | Cite as

A Balancing Act: Developing a Discourse Community in a Mathematics Classroom

  • Miriam Gamoran Sherin


This article examines the pedagogical tensions involved in trying to usestudents' ideas as the basis for class discussion while also ensuring thatdiscussion is productive mathematically. The data for this study of theteaching of one middle-school teacher come from observations andvideotapes of instruction across a school year as well as interviews with theparticipating teacher. Specifically, the article describes the teacher'sattempts to support a student-centered process of mathematicaldiscourse and, at the same time, facilitate discussions of significantmathematical content. This tension in teaching was not easily resolved;throughout the school year the teacher shifted his emphasis betweenmaintaining the process and the content of the classroom discourse.Nevertheless, at times, the teacher balanced these competing goals by usinga ``filtering approach'' to classroom discourse. First multiple ideas aresolicited from students to facilitate the process of student-centeredmathematical discourse. Students are encouraged to elaborate theirthinking, and to compare and evaluate their ideas with those that havealready been suggested. Then, to bring the content to the fore, the teacherfilters the ideas, focusing students' attention on a subset of themathematical ideas that have been raised. Finally, the teacher encouragesstudent-centered discourse about these ideas, thus maintaining a balancebetween process and content.

class discussion discourse community student-centered discourse teacher cognition teacher's role in discussion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ball, D.L. (1989). Beginnings: Transcript from Deborah Ball's Classroom, September 11, 12, 18, 1989. East Lansing, MI: M.A.T.H. Project, College of Education, Michigan State University. Used with permission.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D.L. (1991). What's all this talk about “discourse”? Arithmetic Teacher,39,44–48.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D.L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics.Elementary School Journal,93,373–397.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D.L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms:What we think we know and what we need to learn.Phi Delta Kappan,77,500—508. A BALANCING ACT: DEVELOPING A DISCOURSE COMMUNITY 231Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1992). Fostering a community of learners: A proposal submitted to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Unpublished manuscript,University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological learning theory and the design of innovative environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Cazden, C. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432–462). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Chazan, D. & Ball, D.L. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell.For the Learning of Mathematics,19(2),2–10.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, P.C. & Kenny, M.J. (1996). 1996 Yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  11. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Franke, M.L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V.R. & Empson, S.B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27,458–477.Google Scholar
  12. Fennema, E. & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Fennema, E. & Nelson, B.S. (1997). Mathematics teachers in transition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Heaton, R.M. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hufferd-Ackles, K. (1999). Learning by all in a math-talk learning community.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  16. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lampert, M. (1986). Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication.Cognition and Instruction, 3,305–342.Google Scholar
  18. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.American Educational Research Journal, 27,29–63.Google Scholar
  19. Lappan, G., Fey, T., Fitzgerald, W.M., Friel, S.N. & Phillips, E.D. (1997). Comparing and scaling: Ratio, Proportion, and Percent - The Connected Mathematics Project.Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.Google Scholar
  20. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  21. Louis, D. (1997a). Reflections on my teaching: My mathematics teaching journal.Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  22. Louis, D. (1997b). Talk about math: Understanding communities of learners in a mathematics classroom, A proposal submitted to the Spencer Foundation.Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Louis, D. (1997c). 400%: A case of talking about mathematics.Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Louis, D. (1998). Summary report to the Spencer Foundation.Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  25. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom.Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 232 MIRIAM GAMORAN SHERINGoogle Scholar
  26. Mendez, E.P. (1998). Robust mathematical discussion.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Nathan, M.J., Knuth, E. & Elliott, R. (April, 1998). Analytic and social scaffolding in the mathematics classroom: One teacher's changing practices.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Nathan, M.J., Elliott, R., Knuth, E. & French, A. (March 1997). Self-reflection on teacher goals and actions in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  31. O'Connor, M. & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant framework: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  33. Pimm, D. (1996). Diverse communications. In P.C. Elliott, (Ed.), 1996 Yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 11–19). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  34. Rittenhouse, P.S. (1998). The teacher's role in mathematical conversation: Stepping in and stepping out. In M. Lampert & M.L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 163–189). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers' seminar to the classroom.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1,55–87.Google Scholar
  36. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1998). Toward a theory of Teaching-In-Context. Issues in Education, 4(1),1–94.Google Scholar
  37. Schoenfeld, A.H., Smith, J.P. & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructural psychology (pp. 55–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Sherin, M.G. (1996, April). Novel student behavior as a trigger for change in teachers' content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Sherin, M.G. (1998). Developing teachers' ability to identify student conceptions during instruction. In S.B. Berenson, K.R. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W.N. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  40. Sherin, M.G. (2001). Professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. Nelson & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Shulman, L.S. & Shulman, J.H. (1994). Fostering a Community of Teachers: A proposal submitted to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  42. Silver, E.A. (1996). Moving beyond learning alone and in silence: Observations from the Quasar project concerning communication in mathematics classrooms. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 127–159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. A BALANCING ACT: DEVELOPING A DISCOURSE COMMUNITY 233Google Scholar
  43. Silver, E.A. & Smith, M.S. (1996). Builiding discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P. C. Elliott (Ed.), 1996 Yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 20–28). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  44. Sinclair, J.McH. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, J.P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27,458–477.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, S. & Baxter, J. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. Elementary School Journal, 97,21–38.Google Scholar
  47. Wood, T. (1994). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 149–168). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  48. Wood, T. (1995). An emerging practice of teaching. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 203–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  49. Wood, T. (1997). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing: In H. Steinbring, M. Bartolini-Bussi & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  50. Wood, T. (1999). Creating a context for argument in mathematics class.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,30,171–191.Google Scholar
  51. Wood, T., Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal,28, 587–616.Google Scholar
  52. Yackel, E. & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27,458–477. School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, 2115 N. Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-2610 E-mail: Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miriam Gamoran Sherin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education and Social PolicyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations