Advertisement

Journal of Seismology

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 347–355 | Cite as

Engineering characteristics of the near-field strong motions from the 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce Earthquakes in Turkey

  • Haluk Sucuoğlu
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to summarize the strong motion data from thenearest stations to the fault ruptures of the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli andNovember 12, 1999 Düzce earthquakes and to document informationthat will be significant for its interpretation. Significant engineeringcharacteristics of the near-field strong motions are discussed, with particularemphasis on the site conditions, rupture directivity effects and transversecomponent orientations relative to the fault. In the course of this study,the most significant strong motion stations and adjacent parts of the faultare visited. All locations are verified using a hand-held GPS receiver. Thusinstrument housing characteristics, preliminary impression on siteconditions, and relatively precise relationship of the stations to the nearestfaulting can be reported.

Kocaeli and Düzce earthquakes near-field strongmotions rupture directivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.G., Sucuoğlu, H., Erberik, A., Yılmaz, T., İnan, E., Durukal, E., Erdik, M., Anooshehpoor, R., Brune, J.N. and Der Ni, S., 2000, Ground motions: Implications for seismic hazard analysis, Earthquake Spectra 16 (Suppl. A), 113-137.Google Scholar
  2. Arias, A., 1970, A measure of earthquake intensity, in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 483-469.Google Scholar
  3. Bakır, S.B., Sucuoğlu, H., and Yılmaz, T., 2002, An overview of local site effects and the associated building damage in Adapazarı during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, in press.Google Scholar
  4. Housner, G.W., 1952, Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes, Proc. Symp. Earthquake and Blast Effects in Structures, EERI, LA, CA, pp. 21-36.Google Scholar
  5. Lettis, W., Bachhuberr, J., Witter, R., Barka, A., Bray, J., Page, W. and Swan, F., 2000, Surface fault rupture, Earthquake Spectra 16 (Suppl. A), 11-53.Google Scholar
  6. Somerwille, P.G., Smith, N.F., Graves, R.W. and Abrahamson, N.A., 1997, Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 199-222.Google Scholar
  7. Sucuoğlu, H. and Nurtuğ, A., 1995, Earthquake ground motion characteristics and seismic energy dissipation, Earthquake Eng. Str. Dynamics 24, 1195-1213.Google Scholar
  8. Sucuoğlu, H., 2000, The 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce-Turkey Earthquakes, Proceedings, Mitigation of Seismic Risk, Support to Recently Affected European Countries, Workshop organised by European Commission Belgirate, Italy.Google Scholar
  9. Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G., 1975, A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 581-626.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haluk Sucuoğlu
    • 1
  1. 1.Earthquake Engineering Research Center and Dept. of Civil EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations