Science & Education

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 573–588 | Cite as

Evidence and Warrants for Belief in a College Astronomy Course

  • Nancy W. Brickhouse
  • Zoubeida R. Dagher
  • Harry L. Shipman
  • William J. Letts


Science educators have argued that it is insufficient to be able to recite thetheories of science and not know how knowledge claims in science are justified, what counts as evidence, or how theory and evidence interact. We wonder, however, how much students' understandings of the nature of science vary with content. This paper draws on data collected in a university astronomy course. Data include three interviews and written work from twenty students, as well as written work from the 340 students in the class. This study provides us with evidence on how students' talk and writing about the nature of science differs depending on the particular scientific topic which is under discussion. The relationship between theory and evidence, warrants for belief, and nature of observation are described in various ways in the different disciplines discussed in the course.


Science Educator Scientific Topic Knowledge Claim Evidence Interact College Astronomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G.: 1998, ‘The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural’, Science Education 82, 417-436.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, R.J.: 1983, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  4. Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R., Letts, W.L. & Shipman, H.L.: 2000, ‘The Diversity of Students' Views about Evidence, Theory and the Interface Between Science and Religion in an Astronomy Course’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(4), 340-362.Google Scholar
  5. Brickhouse, N.W., Lowery, P.A. & Schultz, K.: 2000, ‘What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(5), 441-458.Google Scholar
  6. Brickhouse, N.W., Stanley, W.B. & Whitson, J.A.: 1993, ‘Practical Reasoning and Science Education: Implications for Theory and Practice’, Science & Education 2, 363-375.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E. & Ungar, C. 1989, ‘An Experiment Is When You Try It and See If It Works: A Study of Grade 7 Students' Understanding of the Construction of Scientific Knowledge’, International Journal of Science Education 11(5), 514-529.Google Scholar
  8. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P.: 1996, Young People's Images of Science, Open University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  9. Duschl, R.: 1990, Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development, Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Gallison, P. & Stump, D.J. (eds.): 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E.: 1958, Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Monograph 2, Social Sciences Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  12. Hacking, I.: 1996, ‘The Disunities of the Sciences’, in P. Gallison & D.J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp.37-74.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Loughlin, M.: 1988, The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  14. Mallinson, G.G., Mallinson, J.B., Froschaueu, L., Harris, J.A., Lewis, M.C. & Valentino, C.: 1991, Science Horizons, Silver Burdett & Ginn, Morristown, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Millar, R. & Driver, R.: 1987, ‘Beyond Processes’, Studies in Science Education 14, 33-62.Google Scholar
  17. National Academy of Sciences: 1998, Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. National Research Council: 1995, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. Norris, S.P.: 1997, ‘Intellectual Independence for Nonscientists and Other Content-Transcendent Goals of Science Education’, Science Education 81, 239-258.Google Scholar
  20. Roth, W-M. & Lucas, K.B.: 1997, ‘From “Truth” to “Invented Reality”: A Discourse Analysis of High School Physics Students Talk About Scientific Knowledge’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34, 145-179.Google Scholar
  21. Ryder, J., Leach, J. & Driver, R.: 1999, ‘Undergraduate Science Students' Images of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6(2), 201-220.Google Scholar
  22. Samarapungavan, A.: 1992, ‘Children's Judgments in Theory Choice Tasks: Scientific Rationality in Childhood’, Cognition 45(1), 1-32.Google Scholar
  23. Shipman, H.L., Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R. & Letts, W.: 2002, ‘Changes in Student Views of Religion and Science in a College Astronomy Course’, Science Education 86, 526-547.Google Scholar
  24. Stanley, W.B. & Brickhouse, N.W.: 2001, ‘Teaching Sciences: The Multicultural Question Revis-ited’, Science Education 85(1), 35-49.Google Scholar
  25. Weiner, J.: 1994, The Beak oftheFinch, Vintage, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy W. Brickhouse
    • 1
  • Zoubeida R. Dagher
    • 2
  • Harry L. Shipman
    • 3
  • William J. Letts
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Delaware, NewarkUSA. E-mail
  2. 2.University of Delaware, NewarkUSA. E-mail
  3. 3.University of Delaware, NewarkUSA. E-mail
  4. 4.Australia. E-mail

Personalised recommendations