Abstract
Feminist writers critical of the codependency model have argued that codependency refers to an overly strong conformity to the traditional feminine role. Canonical correlation analysis using data from 192 first-year university students found a moderate association between codependency and gender-role identification. The specific nature of this association varied with different aspects of codependency. External focus (approval seeking) was associated with high scores on the negative aspects of femininity and low scores on positive aspects of masculinity. Self-sacrificing was associated with high positive femininity and low negative masculinity. Women scored higher than men on one aspect of codependency: external focus. Although the data are broadly consistent with a feminist critique of codependency, the relationship between codependency and gender-role identification appears to be more complex than previously suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Antill, J. K., Cunningham, J. D., Russell, G., & Thompson, N. L. (1981). An Australian sex-role scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 33 169-183.
Appel, C. (1991). Co-dependency: Acritical appraisal of social and cultural aspects from a feminist perspective. Contemporary Drug Problems, 18 673-686.
Babcock, M. (1995). Critiques of codependency: History and background issues. In M. Babcock & M. C. McKay (Eds.), Challenging codependency: Feminist critiques (pp. 3-24). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Beattie, M. (1989). Codependent no more. Melbourne, Australia: Collins Dove.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 155-162.
Cermak, T. (1986). Diagnosing and treating co-dependence. Minneapolis: Johnson Institute Books.
Cowan, G., & Warren, L. W. (1994). Codependency and gender-stereotyped traits. Sex Roles, 30 631-645.
Crothers, M., & Warren, L. W. (1996). Parental antecedents of adult codependency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52 231-239.
Dear, G. E. (2002). The Holyoake Codependency Index: Further evidence of factorial validity. Drug and Alcohol Review, 21 59-64.
Dear, G. E., & Roberts, C. M. (2000). The Holyoake Codependency Index: Investigation of the factor structure and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 87 991-1002.
DesRoaches, B. (1990). Reclaiming yourself: The codependent's recovery plan. New York: Dell.
Gomberg, E. (1989). On terms used and abused: The concept of “codependency.” Drugs and Society, 3 113-132.
Gordon, J. R., & Barrett, K. (1993). The codependency movement: Issues of context and differentiation. In J. S. Baer, G. A. Marlatt, & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Addictive behaviors across the life span: Prevention, treatment, and policy issues (pp. 307-339). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1965). Manual for the Adjective Check List. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Haaken, J. (1993). From Al-Anon to ACOA: Codependence and the reconstruction of caregiving. Signs, 18 321-345.
Hagan, K. (1989). Codependency and the myth of recovery: A feminist scrutiny. Atlanta, GA: Escapadia Press.
Hands, M., & Dear, G. (1994). Codependency: A critical review. Drug and Alcohol Review, 13 437-445.
Harper, J., & Capdevila, C. (1990). Codependency: Acritique. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 22 285-292.
Hemfelt, R., Minirth, F., & Meier, P. (1989). Love is a choice: Recovery for codependent relationships. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
Krestan, J., & Bepko, C. (1990). Codependency: The social reconstruction of the female experience. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 60 216-232.
Mellody, P. (1989). Facing codependence. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Miller, K. J. (1994). The codependency concept: Does it offer a solution for the spouses of alcoholics? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11 339-345.
Morgan, J. P. (1991). What is codependency? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47 720-729.
O'Brien, P. E., & Gaborit, M. (1992). Codependency: A disorder separate from chemical dependency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48 129-136.
Raven, M. (1994). Codependency: Fact or artifact? In J. W. Toumbourou (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 APSAD Annual National Conference: Alcohol, drugs and the family (pp. 191-196). Melbourne: Australian Drug Foundation.
Russell, G., & Antill, J. K. (1984). An Australian sex-role scale: Additional psychometric data and correlations with self-esteem. Australian Psychologist, 19 13-18.
Spence, J. T., Helreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1673-1682.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Subby, R., & Friel, J. (1984). Co-dependency: A paradoxical dependency. In Co-dependency: An emerging issue (pp. 31-44). Pompano Beach, FL: Health Communications.
Van Wormer, K. (1989). Co-dependency: Implications for women and therapy. Women and Therapy, 8(4) 51-63.
Whitfield, C. (1989). Co-dependence: Our most common addiction—Somephysical, mental, emotional and spiritual perspectives. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 6 19-36.
Woititz, J. G. (1984). The co-dependent spouse: What happens to you when your husband is an alcoholic. In Co-dependency: An emerging issue (pp. 83-91). Pompano Beach, FL: Health Communications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dear, G.E., Roberts, C.M. The Relationships Between Codependency and Femininity and Masculinity. Sex Roles 46, 159–165 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019661702408
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019661702408