Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 47, Issue 9, pp 1903–1908 | Cite as

Timing of Prophylactic Surgery in Prevention of Diverticulitis Recurrence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

  • Robert J. Richards
  • James K. Hammitt
Article

Abstract

Although surgery is recommended after two or more attacks of uncomplicated diverticulitis, the optimal timing for surgery in terms of cost-effectiveness is unknown. A Markov model was used to compare the costs and outcomes of performing surgery after one, two, or three uncomplicated attacks in 60-year-old hypothetical cohorts. Transition state probabilities were assigned values using published data and expert opinion. Costs were estimated from Medicare reimbursement rates. Surgery after the third attack is cost saving, yielding more years of life and quality adjusted life years at a lower cost than the other two strategies. The results were not sensitive to many of the variables tested in the model or to changes made in the discount rate (0–5%). In conclusion, performing prophylactic resection after the third attack of diverticulitis is cost saving in comparison to resection performed after the first or second attacks and remains cost-effective during sensitivity analysis.

diverticulitis cost-effectiveness Markov chains decision making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Lorimer JW: Is prophylactic resection valid as an indication for elective surgery in diverticular disease? Can J Surg 40:445–448, 1997Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambrosetti P, Robert JH, Witzig JA, Mirescu D, Borst F, Rohner A: Acute left colonic diverticulitis: A prospective analysis of 226 consecutive cases. Surgery 115:546–550, 1994Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis-supporting documentation. Dis Colon Rectum 38:126–132, 1995Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: SSAT patient care guidelines 2000. Surgical treatment of diverticulitis. Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hackford AW, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC: Surgical management of complicated diverticulitis. The Lahey clinic experience, 1967 to 1982. Dis Colon Rectum 28:317–321, 1985Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Pemberton JH: Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:71–5, 1985Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J: Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 84:380–383, 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP: Surgical management of diverticulitis. The role of the Hartmann procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 26:429–432, 1983Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moreaux J, Vons C: Elective resection for diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Br J Surg 77:1036–1038, 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elliott TB, Yego S, Irvin TT: Five-year audit of the acute complications of diverticular disease. Br J Surg 84:535–539, 1997Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parks TG: Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. A review of 521 cases. BMJ 4:639–645, 1969Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinchey EF, Schaal PGH, Richards GK: Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109, 1978Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan AL, Ah-See AK, Crofts TC, Heys SD, Eremin O: Surgical management of the septic complications of diverticular disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:16–20, 1995Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belmonte C, Klas JV, Peréz JJ, Wong D, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, et al: The Hartmann procedure. First choice or last resort in diverticular disease? Arch Surg 131:612–617, 1996Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Center for Health Statistics: Vital Statistics of the United States, 1988, volume II, mortality, part A. Washington DC, Public Health Service, 1991Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Almy TP, Howell DA: Diverticular disease of the colon. New Engl J Med 30:324–331, 1980Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simonowitz D, Paloyan D: Diverticular disease of the colon in patients under 40 years of age. Am J Gastroenterol 67:69–72, 1977Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson ND, Driver CP, Davidson AI, Keenan RA: Diverticular disease in patients under 50 years of age. J R Coll Surg Edinb 42:102–104, 1997Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chappuis CW, Cohn I: Acute colonic diverticulitis. Surg Clin North Am 68:301–313, 1988Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cardinale V (ed.) 1997 Drug Topics Red Book, 101st ed. Montvale, New Jersey Medical Economics Data, 1997Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bergamaschi R, Tuetch JJ, Pessauz P, Arnaud JP: Intracorporeal vs. laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 14:520–523, 2000Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R: Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcomes and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18, 1996Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sonnenberg A, Townsend WF: Costs of duodenal ulcer therapy with antibiotics. Arch Intern Med 155:922–928, 1995Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds.). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, 1st ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krukowski ZH, Koruth NM, Matheson NA: Evolving practice in acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg 72:684–686, 1985Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hachigian MP, Honickman S, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP: Computed tomography in the initial management of acute left-sided diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 35:1123–1129, 1992Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haglund U, Hellberg R, Johnsèn C, Hultèn L: Complicated diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. An analysis of short and longterm outcome in 392 patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol 68:41–46, 1979Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tudor RG, Farmakis N, Keighley MRB: National audit of complicated diverticular disease: analysis of index cases. Br J Surg 81:730–732, 1994Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krukowski ZH, Matheson NA: Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: A review. Br J Surg 71:921–927, 1984Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ: Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Br J Surg 79:839–841, 1992Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wigmore SJ, Duthie GS, Young IE, Spalding EM, Rainey JB: Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann's procedure: The Lothian experience 1987–1992. Br J Surg 82:27–30, 1995Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nylamo E: Diverticulitis of the colon: Role of surgery in preventing complications. Ann Chir Gynaecol 79:139–142, 1990Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW: Schroeder TK: Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surgery 222:120–127, 1995Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Farmakis N, Tudor RG, Keighley MRB: The 5-year natural history of complicated diverticular disease. Br J Surg 81:733–735, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Richards
    • 1
  • James K. Hammitt
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas City
  2. 2.Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations