Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 31–59 | Cite as

An Analysis Of Secondary Circulations And Their Effects Caused By Small-Scale Surface Inhomogeneities Using Large-Eddy Simulation

  • S. Raasch
  • G. Harbusch

Abstract

A parallelized large-eddy simulation model has been used to investigate the effects of two-dimensional, discontinuous, small-scale surface heterogeneities on the turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer.Heterogeneities had a typical size of about the boundary-layer heightzi. They were produced by a surface sensible heat flux pattern ofchessboard-type and of strong amplitude as typical, e.g., for the marginalice zone. The major objectives of this study were to determinethe effects of such strong amplitude heat flux variations and to specify theinfluence of different speeds and directions of the background wind.Special emphasis has been given to investigate the secondary circulations induced by the heterogeneities by means of three-dimensional phase averages.

Compared with earlier studies of continuous inhomogeneities, the same sizeddiscontinuous inhomogeneities in this study show similar but stronger effects.Significant changes compared with uniform surface heating are only observedwhen the scale of the inhomogeneities is increased to zi. Especially the vertical energy transport is much more vigorous and even the mean emperature profile shows a positive lapse rate within the whole mixed layer. However, the effects are not directly caused by the different shape of the inhomogeneities but can mainly be attributed to the large amplitude of the imposed heat flux,as it is typical for the partially ice covered sea during cold air outbreaks.

The structure of the secondary flow is found to be very sensitive to the wavelength and shape of the inhomogeneities as well as to the heatflux amplitude, wind speed and wind direction. The main controlling parameter is the near-surface temperature distribution and the related horizontal pressure gradient perpendicular to the main flow direction. The secondary flow varies from a direct circulation with updraughts mainly above the centre of the heated regions to a more indirect circulation with updraughts beneath the centre and downdraughts above it. For background winds larger than 2.5 m s−1 a roll-like circulation pattern is observed.

From previous findings it has often been stated that moderate backgroundwinds of 5 m s−1 eliminate all impacts of surface inhomogeneitiesthat could potentially be produced in realistic landscapes. However, this studyshows that the effects caused by increasing the wind speed stronglydepend on the wind direction relative to the orientation of theinhomogeneities. Secondary circulations remain strong, even for abackground wind of 7.5 m s−1, when the wind direction is orientatedalong one of the two diagonals of the chessboard pattern. On the otherhand, the effects of inhomogeneities are considerably reduced, even undera modest background wind of 2.5 m s−1, if the wind direction isturned by 45°. Mechanisms for the different flow regimesare discussed.

Convective boundary layer Large-eddy simulation Marginal ice zone Surface inhomogeneities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. André, J.-C., Bougeault, P., and Goutorbe, J.-P.: 1990, ‘Regional Estimates of Heat and Evaporation Fluxes over Non-Homogeneous Terrain. Examples from the HAPEX-MOBILHY Programme’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 77–108.Google Scholar
  2. Arola, A.: 1999, ‘Parameterization of Turbulent and Mesoscale Fluxes for Heterogeneous Surfaces’, J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 584–598.Google Scholar
  3. Avissar, R. and Liu, Y.: 1996, ‘Sensitivity of Shallow Convective Precipitation Induced by Land Surface Heterogeneities to Dynamical and Cloud Microphysical Parameters’, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 7477–7497.Google Scholar
  4. Avissar, R. and Schmidt, T.: 1998, ‘An Evaluation of the Scale at which Ground-Surface Heat Flux Patchiness Affects the Convective Boundary Layer Using Large-Eddy Simulations’, J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 2666–2689.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs, G. A.: 1988, ‘Surface Inhomogeneity Effects on Convective Diffusion’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 45, 117–135.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, F. and Avissar, R.: 1994, ‘Impact of Land-Surface Moisture Variability on Local Shallow Convective Cumulus and Precipitation in Large-Scale Models’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 33, 1382–1401.Google Scholar
  7. Chlond, A.: 1992, ‘Three-Dimensional Simulation of Cloud Street Development during a Cold Air Outbreak’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 58, 161–200.Google Scholar
  8. Deardorff, J. W.: 1970, ‘A Numerical Study of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Channel Flow at Large Reynolds Numbers’, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 453–480.Google Scholar
  9. Deardorff, J. W.: 1974, ‘Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Height and Mean Structure of a Heated Planetary Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 81–106.Google Scholar
  10. Deardorff, J. W.: 1980, ‘Stratocumulus-Capped Mixed Layers Derived from a Three-Dimensional Model’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 18, 495–527.Google Scholar
  11. Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E., and Lilly, D. K.: 1969, ‘Laboratory Investigation of Non-Steady Penetrative Convection’, J. Fluid Mech. 35, 7–31.Google Scholar
  12. Hadfield, M. G., Cotton, W. R., and Pielke, R. A.: 1991, ‘Large-Eddy Simulations of Thermally Forced Circulations in the Convective Boundary Layer. Part I: A Small-Scale Circulation with Zero Wind’ Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 57, 79–114.Google Scholar
  13. Hadfield, M. G., Cotton, W. R., and Pielke, R.A.: 1992, ‘Large-Eddy Simulations of Thermally Forced Circulations in the Convective Boundary Layer. Part II: The Effect of Changes in Wavelength and Wind Speed’ Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 58, 307–327.Google Scholar
  14. Hartmann, J., Kottmeier, C., and Raasch, S.: 1997, ‘Roll Vortices and Boundary-Layer Development during a Cold Air Outbreak’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 84, 45–65.Google Scholar
  15. Hechtel, L. M., Moeng, C.-H., and Stull, R. B.: 1990, ‘The Effects of Nonhomogeneous Surface Fluxes on the Convective Boundary Layer: A Case Study Using Large-Eddy Simulation’, J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 1721–1741.Google Scholar
  16. Huynh, B. P., Coulman, C. E., and Turner, T. R.: 1990, ‘Some Turbulence Characteristics of Convectively Mixed Layers over Rugged and Homogeneous Terrain’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 51, 229–254.Google Scholar
  17. Kaimal, J. C., Eversole, R. A., Lenschow, D. H., Stankov, B. B., Kahn, P. H., and Businger, J.A.: 1982, ‘Spectral Characteristics of the Convective Boundary Layer over Uneven Terrain’, J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 1098–1114.Google Scholar
  18. Krettenauer, K. and Schumann, U.: 1989, ‘Direct Numerical Simulation of Thermal Convection over a Wavy Surface’, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 41, 165–179.Google Scholar
  19. Mahrt, L., Sun, J., Vickers, D., MacPherson, J. I., Pederson, J. R., and Desjardins, R. L.: 1994, ‘Observations of Fluxes and Inland Breezes over a Heterogeneous Surface’, J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 2484–2499.Google Scholar
  20. Mason, P. J.: 1988, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 1492–1516.Google Scholar
  21. Moeng, C.-H.: 1984, ‘A Large-Eddy-Simulation Model for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence’, J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2052–2062.Google Scholar
  22. Moeng, C.-H. and Wyngaard, J. C.: 1986, ‘An Analysis of Closures for Pressure-Scalar Covariances in the Convective Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 1499–2513.Google Scholar
  23. Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., Mason, P. J., Moeng, C.-H., and Schumann, U.: 1991, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of the Convective Boundary Layer: A Comparison of Four Computer Codes’, in F. Durst et al. (eds.), Turbulent Shear Flows, Vol. 8, Springer Verlag, pp. 343–367.Google Scholar
  24. Ookouchi, Y., Segal, M., Kessler, R. C., and Pielke, R. A.: 1984, ‘Evaluation of Soil Moisture Effects on the Generation and Modification of Mesoscale Circulations’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 112, 2281–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orszag, S. A.: 1971, ‘Numerical Simulation of Incompressible Flows within Simple Boundaries: Accuracy’, J. Fluid Mech. 49, 75–112.Google Scholar
  26. Philip, J. R.: 1997, ‘Blending Heights for Winds Oblique to Checkerboards’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 82, 263–281.Google Scholar
  27. Raasch, S. and Etling, D.: 1991: ‘Numerical Simulation of Rotating Thermal Convection’, Beitr. Phys. Atmosph. 64, 185–199.Google Scholar
  28. Raasch, S. and Etling, D.: 1998: ‘Modeling Deep Ocean Convection: Large Eddy Simulation in Comparison with Laboratory Experiments’, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 28, 1786–1802.Google Scholar
  29. Raasch, S. and Schröter, M.: 2001: ‘PALM–A Large-Eddy Simulation Model Performing on Massively Parallel Computers’, Z. Meteorol. (Accepted).Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, H. and Schumann, U.: 1989, ‘Coherent Structure of the Convective Boundary Layer Derived from Large-Eddy Simulations’, J. Fluid Mech. 200, 511–562.Google Scholar
  31. Segal, M., Avissar, R., McCumber, M. C., and Pielke, R. A.: 1988, ‘Evaluation of Vegetation Effects on the Generation and Modification of Mesoscale Circulations’, J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 2268–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shen, S. and Leclerc, M. Y.: 1994: ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Small-Scale Surface Effects on the Convective Boundary Layer Structure’, Atmos.-Ocean 32, 717–730.Google Scholar
  33. Shen, S. and Leclerc, M. Y.: 1995, ‘How Large Must Surface Inhomogeneities Be before they Influence the Convective Boundary Layer Structure? A Case Study’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 121, 1209–1228.Google Scholar
  34. Stull, R. B.: 1988, Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Tsvang, L. R., Fedorov, M. M., Kader, B. A., Zubkovskii, S. L., Foken, T., Richter, S. H., and Zeleny, Y. A.: 1991, ‘Turbulent Exchange over a Surface with Chessboard-Type Inhomogeneities’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 55, 141–160.Google Scholar
  36. Walko, R. L., Cotton, W. R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1992, ‘Large-Eddy Simulations of the Effects of Hilly Terrain on the Convective Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 58, 133–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Raasch
    • 1
  • G. Harbusch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Meteorologie und Klimatologie der Universität HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations