Wireless Networks

, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp 445–460 | Cite as

Performance comparison of battery power consumption in wireless multiple access protocols

  • Jyh‐Cheng Chen
  • Krishna M. Sivalingam
  • Prathima Agrawal
Article

Abstract

Energy efficiency is an important issue in mobile wireless networks since the battery life of mobile terminals is limited. Conservation of battery power has been addressed using many techniques such as variable speed CPUs, flash memory, disk spindowns, and so on. We believe that energy conservation should be an important factor in the design of networking protocols for mobile wireless networks. In particular, this paper addresses energy efficiency in medium access control (MAC) protocols for wireless networks. The paper develops a framework to study the energy consumption of a MAC protocol from the transceiver usage perspective. This framework is then applied to compare the performance of a set of protocols that includes IEEE 802.11, EC‐MAC, PRMA, MDR‐TDMA, and DQRUMA*. The performance metrics considered are transmitter and receiver usage times for packet transmission and reception. The time estimates are then combined with power ratings for a Proxim RangeLAN2 radio card to obtain an estimate of the energy consumed for MAC related activities. The analysis here shows that protocols that aim to reduce the number of contentions perform better from an energy consumption perspective. The receiver usage time, however, tends to be higher for protocols that require the mobile to sense the medium before attempting transmission. The paper also provides a set of principles that could be applied when designing access protocols for wireless networks.

*EC‐MAC: energy‐conserving MAC. PRMA: packet reservation multiple access. MDR‐TDMA: multiservices dynamic reservation TDMA. DQRUMA: distributed‐queuing request update multiple access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P. Agrawal, E. Hyden, P. Krzyzanowski, P. Mishra, M.B. Srivastava and J.A. Trotter, SWAN: A mobile multimedia wireless network, IEEE Personal Communications 3(2) (April 1996) 18–33.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Alonso and S. Ganguly, Energy efficient query optimization, Technical Report MITL-TR-33-92, Matsushita Info Tech Lab, Princeton, NJ (November 1993).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Borgonovo, M. Zorzi, L. Fratta, V. Trecordi and G. Bianchi, Capture-division packet access for wireless personal communications, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 14(4) (May 1996) 609–622.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.-C. Chen, K.M. Sivalingam and R. Acharya, Comparative analysis of wireless ATM channel access protocols supporting multimedia traffic, Mobile Networks and Applications 3(3) (1998) 293–306.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.-C. Chen, K.M. Sivalingam, P. Agrawal and S. Kishore, A comparison of MAC protocols for wireless local networks based on battery power consumption, in: Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, CA (April 1998) pp. 150–157.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Chockalingam and M. Zorzi, Energy efficiency of media access protocols for mobile data networks, IEEE Transactions on Communications 46 (November 1998) 1418–1421.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Douglis, P. Krishnan and B. Marsh, Thwarting the power-hungry disk, in: Proc. of Winter 1994 USENIX Conference (January 1994) pp. 293–306.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    ETSI-RES10, High performance radio local area network (HIPERLAN), ETS 300 (February 1997).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Fox, E.A. Brewer, S. Gribble and E. Amir, Adapting to network and client variability via on-demand dynamic transcoding, in: Proc. of ASPLOS-VII (October 1996).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    D.J. Goodman, R.A. Valenzuela, K.T. Gayliard and B. Ramamurthi, Packet reservation multiple access for local wireless communications, IEEE Transactions on Communications 37(8) (August 1989) 885–890.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D.J. Goodman and S.X. Wei, Efficiency of packet reservation multiple access, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 40(1) (February 1991) 170–176.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B.M. Gordon, E. Tsern and T.H. Meng, Design of a low power video decompression chip set for portable applications, Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems 13 (1996) 125–142.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Govil, E. Chan and H. Wasserman, Comparing algorithms for dynamic speed-setting of a low-power CPU, in: Proc. of ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Berkeley, CA (October 1995) pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    IEEE, Std 802.11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications (November 1997).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Imilienski, S. Vishwanathan and B.R. Badrinath, Energy efficient indexing on air, in: Proc. of ACM SIGMOD (May 1994).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Intel Corporation, Microsoft and Toshiba Corporation, Advanced configuration & power interface (1998), http://www. teleport.com/_acpi/.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Intel power measurement tools, http://developer.intel. com/design/mobile/intelpower/tools/.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.R. Jump, YACSIM Reference Manual, 2.1 ed., Rice University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (March 1993).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M.J. Karol, Z. Liu and K.Y. Eng, An efficient demand-assignment multiple access protocol for wireless packet (ATM) networks, Wireless Networks 1(3) (1995) 267–279.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Kleinrock and F.A. Tobagi, Packet switching in radio channels: Part I – Carrier sense multiple-access modes and their throughputdelay characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Communications 23(12) (December 1975) 1400–1416.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    A.M. Law and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    P. Lettieri, C. Fragouli and M.B. Srivastava, Low power error control for wireless links, in: Proc. of ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Budapest, Hungary (September 1997) pp. 139–150.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Lucent Technologies, The age of wireless LANs has arrived (1996), http://www.wavelan.com/.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Naghshineh (guest ed.), Special issue on Wireless ATM, IEEE Personal Communications 3(4) (August 1996).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Zorzi (guest ed.), Energy management in personal communications and mobile computing, IEEE Personal Communications 5(3) (June 1998).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    B. Marsh, F. Douglis and P. Krishnan, Flash memory file caching for mobile computers, Technical Report MITL-TR-59-93, Matsushita Info Tech Lab, Princeton, NJ (June 1993).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    K.S. Natarajan, A hybrid medium access control protocol for wireless LANs, in: Proc. Of 1992 IEEE International Conference on Selected Topics in Wireless Communications, Vancouver, BC, Canada (June 1992).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    D. Petras and A. Kramling, MAC protocol with polling and fast collision resolution for an ATM air interface, in: Proc. of IEEE ATM Workshop, San Francisco, CA (August 1996).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Proxim Inc, Proxim: the leader in wireless LANs (1998), http:// www.proxim.com/.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    D. Raychaudhuri, L.J. French, R.J. Siracusa, S.K. Biswas, R. Yuan, P. Narasimhan and C.A. Johnston, WATMnet: A prototype wireless ATM system for multimedia personal communication, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 15(1) (January 1997) 83–95.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    D. Raychaudhuri and N.D. Wilson, ATM-based transport architecture for multi-services wireless personal communication networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 12(8) (October 1994) 1401–1414.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    R. Rom and M. Sidi, Multiple Access Protocols: Performance and Analysis (Springer, Berlin, 1990).Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    J.M. Rulnick and N. Bambos, Mobile power management for wireless communication networks, Wireless Networks 3(1) (March 1997) 3–14.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    S. Singh and C.S. Raghavendra, PAMAS: Power aware multi-access protocol with signaling for ad hoc networks, ACM Computer Communication Review (July 1998) 5–26.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    S. Singh, M. Woo and C.S. Raghavendra, Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks, in: Proc. of ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Dallas, TX (October 1998) pp. 181–190.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    K.M. Sivalingam, J.-C. Chen, P. Agrawal and M.B. Srivastava, Design and analysis of low-power access protocols for wireless and mobile ATM networks, Mobile Networks and Applications (1999, to appear).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    K.M. Sivalingam, M.B. Srivastava and P. Agrawal, Low power link and access protocols for wireless multimedia networks, in: Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Phoenix, AZ (May 1997) pp. 1331–1335.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    M. Stemm and R.H. Katz, Measuring and reducing energy consumption of network interfaces in hand-held devices, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Science (August 1997).Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    J. Walrand, Communication Networks (Aksen Associates, Inc., 1991).Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    M. Zorzi and R. Rao, Energy constrained error control for wireless channels, IEEE Personal Communications (December 1997).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    M. Zorzi and R.R. Rao, Error control and energy consumption in communications for nomadic computing, IEEE Transactions on Computers 46(3) (March 1997) 279–289.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jyh‐Cheng Chen
    • 1
  • Krishna M. Sivalingam
    • 2
  • Prathima Agrawal
    • 3
  1. 1.Telcordia TechnologiesMorristownUSA
  2. 2.School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  3. 3.Telcordia TechnologiesMorristownUSA

Personalised recommendations